14 Comments
User's avatar
PERSISTENT OBJECTOR to new IHR's avatar

Real atomic war as a means of population control would be too untidy a means. The nuclear threat on the other hand has been effective since the Seventies, later replaced by the climate catastrophe threat. Then as now young couples used to say, and still say, "we are not procreating because no child should be exposed to such a bleak future". And, today, the additional argument is to limit one's carbon footprint by not producing additional breathers/exhales.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

Further the costs of child rearing are rather hard for even two income familes.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Gates wants less population so he can say that he has $2 per person, whereas at the moment he only has $1 per person.

One can see where he's coming from.

Doubling his money.

Imagine - counting your money in terms of how much for every man, woman and child.

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

The numbers can't change, silly, that would confuse people.

Expand full comment
Avisaurea's avatar

Atomic war and vax are not the only tools to control population grows

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

Of course. They happen to be among the options, agreed upon Fail Safe chosen methods of the hour. Even as poison kills as easily as a knife.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Castrating and other ways of stopping breeding are a bit slow to show results.

Getting people to line up to be shot, maybe with something more toxic, that's what I think that the plan is.

You know, something sneaky with the aspect of getting people to agree to it.

Expand full comment
PERSISTENT OBJECTOR to new IHR's avatar

More direct, overt Euthanasia is also being made widely available.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

Arguably the injected chose Euthanasia in the slow but steady lane.

Expand full comment
PERSISTENT OBJECTOR to new IHR's avatar

But if India and China are the most populous, why - from eugenicists' perspective - push vaccination in other, less populous regions namely the West? Simply because of easier access?

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

Both states, China especially, lost population from vax. Three or four years will show how much damage. Eugenecists need to destroy the West. Then Christianity globally. Then they triumph.

Expand full comment
PERSISTENT OBJECTOR to new IHR's avatar

I was under the impression that China had not used mRNA formulas. I may be wrong. It does happen.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

It did not matter. China shut down hard and vaccinated. No vax is safe.

Expand full comment
PERSISTENT OBJECTOR to new IHR's avatar

True. So many narratives. Too many. As intended.

Expand full comment