Real atomic war as a means of population control would be too untidy a means. The nuclear threat on the other hand has been effective since the Seventies, later replaced by the climate catastrophe threat. Then as now young couples used to say, and still say, "we are not procreating because no child should be exposed to such a bleak future". And, today, the additional argument is to limit one's carbon footprint by not producing additional breathers/exhales.
But if India and China are the most populous, why - from eugenicists' perspective - push vaccination in other, less populous regions namely the West? Simply because of easier access?
Both states, China especially, lost population from vax. Three or four years will show how much damage. Eugenecists need to destroy the West. Then Christianity globally. Then they triumph.
Real atomic war as a means of population control would be too untidy a means. The nuclear threat on the other hand has been effective since the Seventies, later replaced by the climate catastrophe threat. Then as now young couples used to say, and still say, "we are not procreating because no child should be exposed to such a bleak future". And, today, the additional argument is to limit one's carbon footprint by not producing additional breathers/exhales.
Further the costs of child rearing are rather hard for even two income familes.
Gates wants less population so he can say that he has $2 per person, whereas at the moment he only has $1 per person.
One can see where he's coming from.
Doubling his money.
Imagine - counting your money in terms of how much for every man, woman and child.
The numbers can't change, silly, that would confuse people.
Atomic war and vax are not the only tools to control population grows
Of course. They happen to be among the options, agreed upon Fail Safe chosen methods of the hour. Even as poison kills as easily as a knife.
Castrating and other ways of stopping breeding are a bit slow to show results.
Getting people to line up to be shot, maybe with something more toxic, that's what I think that the plan is.
You know, something sneaky with the aspect of getting people to agree to it.
More direct, overt Euthanasia is also being made widely available.
Arguably the injected chose Euthanasia in the slow but steady lane.
But if India and China are the most populous, why - from eugenicists' perspective - push vaccination in other, less populous regions namely the West? Simply because of easier access?
Both states, China especially, lost population from vax. Three or four years will show how much damage. Eugenecists need to destroy the West. Then Christianity globally. Then they triumph.
I was under the impression that China had not used mRNA formulas. I may be wrong. It does happen.
It did not matter. China shut down hard and vaccinated. No vax is safe.
True. So many narratives. Too many. As intended.