Discussion about this post

User's avatar
PERSISTENT OBJECTOR to new IHR's avatar

Real atomic war as a means of population control would be too untidy a means. The nuclear threat on the other hand has been effective since the Seventies, later replaced by the climate catastrophe threat. Then as now young couples used to say, and still say, "we are not procreating because no child should be exposed to such a bleak future". And, today, the additional argument is to limit one's carbon footprint by not producing additional breathers/exhales.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Gates wants less population so he can say that he has $2 per person, whereas at the moment he only has $1 per person.

One can see where he's coming from.

Doubling his money.

Imagine - counting your money in terms of how much for every man, woman and child.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts