I might be wrong- but in my opinion Putin is not a globalist. He tried to play the game for several years, but understood- too late in my opinion- that for globalists only a unipolar world can exist. The world of BRICS is the start of the multipolar world. The transition is painful but it is the only way to preserve the diversity of peoples, religions, cultures, traditions, peoples formed during centuries within a certain common history with its specific myths, within a certain geography. Otherwise - the world of the free market will level us all and transform us in "happy" consumers who owe nothing. Actually the WEF admit what plans they have for the future of humanity, the transhumanist agenda- Klaus Schwab and Yuval Harari thinking is not only stupid but there are signs of madness (humans are hackable animals, there is no more any mystery of the human soul etc).Even alive physically, a people without its spiritual and religious roots is reduced to a material, meaningless survival, used for others wars. Any culture, any ethnicity is unique and belongs to humanity. If small countries have in general no choice, and only individual salvation can be envisaged, this will not be the case for Russia. Here is one of Putin discourses from this year. He is not a demagogue, this is his thinking. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69465
Russian civilization is an old, unique world, with deep roots in the tradition of oriental Christianity.
Neither tradition nor Christianity has any place in a global unipolar world.
I remain rather skeptical. Look up Perestroika Deception or New Lies for Old.
Further I think the Russian revolution was enabled by both German bankers and English. Resources on the cheap. Not unlike China's revolution being engineered by Yale in China. I see multi polar as having nothing to do with human freedom and everything to do with a bigger pie slice. On the margins a bit of change on the order of consumer rebranding: BP logging the Amazon rebranded as Green.
Russian Revolution and Perestroika are history. It is quite amazing how naive was Gorbatchev believing that NATO will not expand. I cannot imagine he was bought, but who knows. Secondly- how could they not preview the consequences of USSR collapse and the fate of the countries becoming independent and surrounding Russia. The reason is probably that Russia had not any power to react at that time. Ukraine was the last mistake. And now Merkel saying that they signed Minsk agreements to give Ukraine time to arm itself, and Putin responding that he was wrong to delay the military intervention and asking rhetorically how can they trust anymore Germany? An international treaty co-signed by UN, France and Germany was a masquerade.
We are in a different point in time and Russia is fighting for its survival. Both Russia and China are different from what they were 30 years ago, they are so called emergent powers and they have the right to have a sovereign voice. The West seem to have become incapable of what is called from centuries in the civilized world foreign affaires. The only rule they know is that everyone should follow their rules.
The history is made by the great powers. In my opinion an USA unipolar world is dangerous, they are not capable of cooperation; all international organisms are infiltrated and bribed by them, the dollar has been weaponized, there is no more international law. We can list the wars they started, the millions of lives destroyed by war or sanctions, since they remained the only great power. I think you know better than me what is going on within USA, do you have any explanation why they use against their own people the bioweapons of covid 19 and vaccines? Who is running in fact this country?
As for the multipolar world- we will see how good this will be. for sure- what we see now is a nightmare.
I might be wrong- but in my opinion Putin is not a globalist. He tried to play the game for several years, but understood- too late in my opinion- that for globalists only a unipolar world can exist. The world of BRICS is the start of the multipolar world. The transition is painful but it is the only way to preserve the diversity of peoples, religions, cultures, traditions, peoples formed during centuries within a certain common history with its specific myths, within a certain geography. Otherwise - the world of the free market will level us all and transform us in "happy" consumers who owe nothing. Actually the WEF admit what plans they have for the future of humanity, the transhumanist agenda- Klaus Schwab and Yuval Harari thinking is not only stupid but there are signs of madness (humans are hackable animals, there is no more any mystery of the human soul etc).Even alive physically, a people without its spiritual and religious roots is reduced to a material, meaningless survival, used for others wars. Any culture, any ethnicity is unique and belongs to humanity. If small countries have in general no choice, and only individual salvation can be envisaged, this will not be the case for Russia. Here is one of Putin discourses from this year. He is not a demagogue, this is his thinking. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69465
Russian civilization is an old, unique world, with deep roots in the tradition of oriental Christianity.
Neither tradition nor Christianity has any place in a global unipolar world.
I remain rather skeptical. Look up Perestroika Deception or New Lies for Old.
Further I think the Russian revolution was enabled by both German bankers and English. Resources on the cheap. Not unlike China's revolution being engineered by Yale in China. I see multi polar as having nothing to do with human freedom and everything to do with a bigger pie slice. On the margins a bit of change on the order of consumer rebranding: BP logging the Amazon rebranded as Green.
Russian Revolution and Perestroika are history. It is quite amazing how naive was Gorbatchev believing that NATO will not expand. I cannot imagine he was bought, but who knows. Secondly- how could they not preview the consequences of USSR collapse and the fate of the countries becoming independent and surrounding Russia. The reason is probably that Russia had not any power to react at that time. Ukraine was the last mistake. And now Merkel saying that they signed Minsk agreements to give Ukraine time to arm itself, and Putin responding that he was wrong to delay the military intervention and asking rhetorically how can they trust anymore Germany? An international treaty co-signed by UN, France and Germany was a masquerade.
We are in a different point in time and Russia is fighting for its survival. Both Russia and China are different from what they were 30 years ago, they are so called emergent powers and they have the right to have a sovereign voice. The West seem to have become incapable of what is called from centuries in the civilized world foreign affaires. The only rule they know is that everyone should follow their rules.
The history is made by the great powers. In my opinion an USA unipolar world is dangerous, they are not capable of cooperation; all international organisms are infiltrated and bribed by them, the dollar has been weaponized, there is no more international law. We can list the wars they started, the millions of lives destroyed by war or sanctions, since they remained the only great power. I think you know better than me what is going on within USA, do you have any explanation why they use against their own people the bioweapons of covid 19 and vaccines? Who is running in fact this country?
As for the multipolar world- we will see how good this will be. for sure- what we see now is a nightmare.
Not sure you know Harold Pinter Nobel prize lecture, 2005. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PH96tuRA3L0
After all, it is about truth. Nothing can be built on lies just a fantasy world which sooner or later will collapse.
Skepticism should be worn as a Badge of Honor, and hailed as a true life-saver.
All seated up top dine at the same table that was prepared by ancient malignancies, and there is no possibility of an alternate menu.
It is written on a stone much harder than adamantine, though many men will argue this, having not seen the forest for the trees.
Grace preserve us.
Except no collapse of inner communist party. KGB never lost power. Thesis of author goes into detail about long range planning.