Bats deal to mosquitoes 1,000 an hour. Spraying needs halting. Natural methods are better all round. So much for democrats ecological and enviro talk. Hypocrisy.
Has passed a bill banning "stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), solar radiation modification (SRM) experimentation, and other hazardous weather engineering activities" (as of April 2, 2024).
Pennsylvania
Introduced legislation (modeled after Tennessee's bill) to ban chemtrails, sponsored by State Senator Doug Mastriano.
Rhode Island
Introduced SB 2540, which would prohibit "stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), solar radiation modification (SRM) experimentation, and other hazardous weather engineering activities" (as of April 2, 2024).
Kentucky
Introduced HB 506, which would ban "any form of geoengineering activities," including "intentional manipulation of the environment, through an atmospheric polluting activity, to effect changes to the earth's atmosphere or surface" (as of April 2, 2024).
Minnesota
Introduced HB 4687, which would ban "polluting atmospheric activity or use an unmarked or unidentified aircraft or other vehicle or facility" (as of April 2, 2024).
New Hampshire
Introduced HB 1700, which would outlaw the "intentional release of polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation" (as of April 2, 2024).
South Dakota
Introduced SB 215, which would ban the "intentional release of polluting emissions into the atmosphere by cloud seeding" (as of April 2, 2024).
Agreed. But it does represent a bit of public awareness, that many are looking up. If only that it is progress. Also I know the Tennessee legislation involves high fines. It's a start. Thanks S
Just as the Chinese war against sparrows resulted in ecological disaster, this broadcasting of airborne poisons is exterminating bees, without which agriculture is largely impossible.
Yes. The goal is the end of agriculture as we know it today. As well as thanks to injections the end of humanity as well. I am open minded on the consideration this is not only psychopathology.
An egregore is an autonomous thought form or psychic entity created when two or more people are focused on the same idea or image. Thoughtforms are purposely developed to serve the aim of a group or individual. They’re also created organically when people who are not necessarily connected in a formal group focus on the same ideal or image, like entertainment characters that go viral and become icons. Spiritual, occult, religious, political and other groups with specific aims create egregores, using symbols and rituals to focus and draw upon the energy of individual members/believers/fans/participants to fuel it. Their energy helps to sustain the psychic entity, and the psychic entity then influences the individual in some way through this connection.
Egregores Exist on Three Levels
It is believed that only humans can form egregores, but once formed they exist on three levels: the material, the astral, and the celestial. On the material level the thoughtform is connected to symbols, icons, images, talismans, relics, ritual objects, rituals, or materials that represent and connect to it. We live in a world of symbols and icons, from the simple forward pointing arrow that means ‘go this way’ to the ubiquitous Coca-Cola symbol and religious symbols like the Christian cross. Every symbol has an egregore associated with it, and that psychic entity exists on the astral plane, in the realm of emotion, spirits, and thoughts. The entity’s vitality is fed and nurtured by the emotions and thoughts of the individuals who connect to it.
What is the connection between egregores and the celestial plane? I wasn’t sure, so I asked Mark about it.
MARK STAVISH (MS): On the celestial level, egregores are connected to cosmic principles. These could be deities, god forms, archetypes, or abstract principles like beauty, harmony, or war. For example, any Parisian or Italian fashion show will have a connection to the ideals of Venus such as beauty and harmony, regardless of how ridiculous the outfits might be. Every football team’s egregore has a relationship to the archetype of Mars, and its characteristic competition. Egregores are connected to the celestial plane, whether to specific deities or to the much broader ideals that they represent. The thing we have to remember is that these entities have their own agendas. We don’t know what their agendas are, all we can do is try to understand them. One takes a serious risk if they think they can control it. It’s better to take the approach of developing a relationship with it, with the understanding that the relationship is going to be tricky. Anyone who thinks they can control one is foolish. These things have their own agendas and if yours doesn’t match theirs, you lose.
Egregores - I did not know there was a name for this concept. I have long felt that whatever we devote our attention to (worship) becomes, in some sense, real (a false god).
I'm particularly intrigued that egregores are focused around symbols. Although an image of a thing is not the thing ("Ceci n'est pas une pipe"), it does represent the thing - i.e., it is a representative of that thing. What is the function of a representative? It is to aggregate and convey power or sentiment. Thus, when we create representations (representatives) of ugly, evil things, we project ugliness and evil into our world.
I would argue that our society is preoccupied with creating representations of ugliness and evil, and that by doing so, we have opened ourselves up to tremendous malign influence.
A most basic use of symbol is in communication. In this sense a symbol is an intermediate sign, the objectification of an idea.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B032 A formal sign communicates a subjective meaning to someone. Thus there is the use of signs, e.g., in conversation, sign language, or even in art. In this function a symbol unites the communicating parties; but in uniting them it presupposes that they were separated and were in need of being united.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B033
Berdyaev uses the word “symbol” also in a broader sense. The human spirit objectivates itself, e.g., in its artifacts and institutions. These external vehicles reflect the spirit which they objectivate. Nevertheless, no deposit of spirit can contain the fullness of the spirit. It can be only symbolical, not fully representing but only indicating the reality it objectivates.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B034
For Berdyaev a certain sense of inadequacy attaches therefore to the term “symbolical”. The symbol is needed for communication in a world of separation, where spirit is isolated from spirit and where union is sought by means of conventional signs.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B035 In this sense the symbol is a function of society, serving to hold it together.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B036 That is true not only of the linguistic symbol but of all human laws and institutions. Indeed, it characterizes the rational function of man in general. Reason is the faculty in man, says Berdyaev, in terms of which he
WTJ 24:1 (Nov 61) p. 39
adjusts to the world-process.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B037 Even the universal validity which reason seeks is itself social, being a means of universal communication. In all its manifestations it can overcome the separation in the world only in terms of external Reason and its concepts are adequate to the objectivated world of separation; they are inadequate to express the spiritual realities which this world objectivates.
Do you think your own thoughts? Can you sort what is yours and what is given? How much of you is influenced? Do you know where you end and society begins? Is any human ever so individuated that they are an island all unto themselves? Is our power in our independence, or in our interdependence? Who are we? What are we? And where are we going
I was hitherto unfamiliar with Berdyaev, but his idea of "objectivating" - "These external vehicles reflect the spirit which they objectivate." - seems virtually identical with what I was saying about representation.
It seems that whenever and wherever there are those who scratch the surface of this world, we tend to see the same thing underneath.
As for influence ... That is the key to everything. True power is not brute force, it is the ability to persuade.
Our reality has always been an influence game. The snake did not compel Eve to pick the fruit, he merely suggested persuasively that she do so. Every atrocity begins with some people persuading others to take a particular course of action.
We have our crude forms of influence - advertising, propaganda, social media - but the little, infernal voice whispering in the back of every human mind is far more sophisticated.
Bats deal to mosquitoes 1,000 an hour. Spraying needs halting. Natural methods are better all round. So much for democrats ecological and enviro talk. Hypocrisy.
Tennessee
Has passed a bill banning "stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), solar radiation modification (SRM) experimentation, and other hazardous weather engineering activities" (as of April 2, 2024).
Pennsylvania
Introduced legislation (modeled after Tennessee's bill) to ban chemtrails, sponsored by State Senator Doug Mastriano.
Rhode Island
Introduced SB 2540, which would prohibit "stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), solar radiation modification (SRM) experimentation, and other hazardous weather engineering activities" (as of April 2, 2024).
Kentucky
Introduced HB 506, which would ban "any form of geoengineering activities," including "intentional manipulation of the environment, through an atmospheric polluting activity, to effect changes to the earth's atmosphere or surface" (as of April 2, 2024).
Minnesota
Introduced HB 4687, which would ban "polluting atmospheric activity or use an unmarked or unidentified aircraft or other vehicle or facility" (as of April 2, 2024).
New Hampshire
Introduced HB 1700, which would outlaw the "intentional release of polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation" (as of April 2, 2024).
South Dakota
Introduced SB 215, which would ban the "intentional release of polluting emissions into the atmosphere by cloud seeding" (as of April 2, 2024).
Wait and see if the law is just or just the law the Deepest Deep State can ignore..
Agreed. But it does represent a bit of public awareness, that many are looking up. If only that it is progress. Also I know the Tennessee legislation involves high fines. It's a start. Thanks S
Just as the Chinese war against sparrows resulted in ecological disaster, this broadcasting of airborne poisons is exterminating bees, without which agriculture is largely impossible.
Yes. The goal is the end of agriculture as we know it today. As well as thanks to injections the end of humanity as well. I am open minded on the consideration this is not only psychopathology.
https://www.newdawnmagazine.com/articles/newscience-consciousness/the-power-of-egregores-an-interview-with-mark-stavish
An egregore is an autonomous thought form or psychic entity created when two or more people are focused on the same idea or image. Thoughtforms are purposely developed to serve the aim of a group or individual. They’re also created organically when people who are not necessarily connected in a formal group focus on the same ideal or image, like entertainment characters that go viral and become icons. Spiritual, occult, religious, political and other groups with specific aims create egregores, using symbols and rituals to focus and draw upon the energy of individual members/believers/fans/participants to fuel it. Their energy helps to sustain the psychic entity, and the psychic entity then influences the individual in some way through this connection.
Egregores Exist on Three Levels
It is believed that only humans can form egregores, but once formed they exist on three levels: the material, the astral, and the celestial. On the material level the thoughtform is connected to symbols, icons, images, talismans, relics, ritual objects, rituals, or materials that represent and connect to it. We live in a world of symbols and icons, from the simple forward pointing arrow that means ‘go this way’ to the ubiquitous Coca-Cola symbol and religious symbols like the Christian cross. Every symbol has an egregore associated with it, and that psychic entity exists on the astral plane, in the realm of emotion, spirits, and thoughts. The entity’s vitality is fed and nurtured by the emotions and thoughts of the individuals who connect to it.
What is the connection between egregores and the celestial plane? I wasn’t sure, so I asked Mark about it.
MARK STAVISH (MS): On the celestial level, egregores are connected to cosmic principles. These could be deities, god forms, archetypes, or abstract principles like beauty, harmony, or war. For example, any Parisian or Italian fashion show will have a connection to the ideals of Venus such as beauty and harmony, regardless of how ridiculous the outfits might be. Every football team’s egregore has a relationship to the archetype of Mars, and its characteristic competition. Egregores are connected to the celestial plane, whether to specific deities or to the much broader ideals that they represent. The thing we have to remember is that these entities have their own agendas. We don’t know what their agendas are, all we can do is try to understand them. One takes a serious risk if they think they can control it. It’s better to take the approach of developing a relationship with it, with the understanding that the relationship is going to be tricky. Anyone who thinks they can control one is foolish. These things have their own agendas and if yours doesn’t match theirs, you lose.
Egregores - I did not know there was a name for this concept. I have long felt that whatever we devote our attention to (worship) becomes, in some sense, real (a false god).
I'm particularly intrigued that egregores are focused around symbols. Although an image of a thing is not the thing ("Ceci n'est pas une pipe"), it does represent the thing - i.e., it is a representative of that thing. What is the function of a representative? It is to aggregate and convey power or sentiment. Thus, when we create representations (representatives) of ugly, evil things, we project ugliness and evil into our world.
I would argue that our society is preoccupied with creating representations of ugliness and evil, and that by doing so, we have opened ourselves up to tremendous malign influence.
Symbol and Reality in Nicolas Berdyaev
Robert D. Knudsen
According to Nicolas Berdyaev, a symbol is an external sign that objectivates an inner reality.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B031
A most basic use of symbol is in communication. In this sense a symbol is an intermediate sign, the objectification of an idea.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B032 A formal sign communicates a subjective meaning to someone. Thus there is the use of signs, e.g., in conversation, sign language, or even in art. In this function a symbol unites the communicating parties; but in uniting them it presupposes that they were separated and were in need of being united.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B033
Berdyaev uses the word “symbol” also in a broader sense. The human spirit objectivates itself, e.g., in its artifacts and institutions. These external vehicles reflect the spirit which they objectivate. Nevertheless, no deposit of spirit can contain the fullness of the spirit. It can be only symbolical, not fully representing but only indicating the reality it objectivates.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B034
For Berdyaev a certain sense of inadequacy attaches therefore to the term “symbolical”. The symbol is needed for communication in a world of separation, where spirit is isolated from spirit and where union is sought by means of conventional signs.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B035 In this sense the symbol is a function of society, serving to hold it together.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B036 That is true not only of the linguistic symbol but of all human laws and institutions. Indeed, it characterizes the rational function of man in general. Reason is the faculty in man, says Berdyaev, in terms of which he
WTJ 24:1 (Nov 61) p. 39
adjusts to the world-process.https://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj24-1-03#G1961B037 Even the universal validity which reason seeks is itself social, being a means of universal communication. In all its manifestations it can overcome the separation in the world only in terms of external Reason and its concepts are adequate to the objectivated world of separation; they are inadequate to express the spiritual realities which this world objectivates.
Canto XLV
By https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/ezra-pound
With Usura
With usura hath no man a house of good stone
each block cut smooth and well fitting
that design might cover their face,
with usura
hath no man a painted paradise on his church wall
harpes et luz
or where virgin receiveth message
and halo projects from incision,
with usura
seeth no man Gonzaga his heirs and his concubines
no picture is made to endure nor to live with
but it is made to sell and sell quickly
with usura, sin against nature,
is thy bread ever more of stale rags
is thy bread dry as paper,
with no mountain wheat, no strong flour
with usura the line grows thick
with usura is no clear demarcation
and no man can find site for his dwelling.
Stonecutter is kept from his stone
weaver is kept from his loom
WITH USURA
wool comes not to market
sheep bringeth no gain with usura
https://solarchariot.medium.com/between-egregore-and-tulpas-2cba293340cb
Do you think your own thoughts? Can you sort what is yours and what is given? How much of you is influenced? Do you know where you end and society begins? Is any human ever so individuated that they are an island all unto themselves? Is our power in our independence, or in our interdependence? Who are we? What are we? And where are we going
I was hitherto unfamiliar with Berdyaev, but his idea of "objectivating" - "These external vehicles reflect the spirit which they objectivate." - seems virtually identical with what I was saying about representation.
It seems that whenever and wherever there are those who scratch the surface of this world, we tend to see the same thing underneath.
As for influence ... That is the key to everything. True power is not brute force, it is the ability to persuade.
Our reality has always been an influence game. The snake did not compel Eve to pick the fruit, he merely suggested persuasively that she do so. Every atrocity begins with some people persuading others to take a particular course of action.
We have our crude forms of influence - advertising, propaganda, social media - but the little, infernal voice whispering in the back of every human mind is far more sophisticated.
Berdyaev is quite amazing. Russian Orthodox philosopher and cleric. I own many of his books.
https://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Philosophy/Sui-Generis/Berdyaev/essays/index.htm
"pesticides".
That's a broad category.
Are you a pest to TPTB.