The famous Lech Wałesa who supposedly ended communism in Poland, “did” so after meeting with Rockefellers. From archives:” Solidarity leader Lech Walesa kissed the hand of a Rockefeller and wowed a gathering of industrial leaders and union bigwigs on his triumphant arrival in the capital of the capitalist world.”
Sure because they were in sympathy not with Catholicism per se but Marxist Catholicism. And further this all is co-ordinated from above. As I recall from my reading the USSR never ended just shape shifted. What is interesting though is the erasure of old urls from like 2010. Archived if you can locate the text online.
In his 1984 book entitled, New Lies for Old, Committee for State Security (KGB) defector Anatoliy Golitsyn predicted a forthcoming fake democratization of communist bloc countries for the ultimate goal of deceiving and defeating the West. According to Golitsyn, Czechoslovakia played a significant role in the deception. The Prague Spring of 1968 was a communist provoked uprising that was to be replicated on a larger scale in the future. On 17 November 1989, Czechoslovak secret police provocateurs led an official communist student demonstration away from its approved course of march in Prague. When the police surrounded and viciously attacked the crowd of protestors, one of the secret police agents posed as a dead student. In only a few days the news of the alleged student killing led to a general uprising. It appears that some members of the Czechoslovak Communist Party and the Czechoslovak secret services, in cooperation with the Soviet secret service, planned, organized, and initiated the events of 17 November 1989, which marked the start of the Velvet Revolution. The Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia was not a genuine revolt of the Czech and Slovak people against the communist regime. Rather, it is the hypothesis of this paper that, as foreseen by Golitsyn, the revolution was a communist planned handing of power to new cadres as part of a long-term deception strategy designed to transform and unify Europe into a neutral socialist continent.
Thanks for the link! It has worked for them for hundreds of years, this magical trickster ability. It is always easy to spot too: after Wałesa met with them, he started being popular. When a famous priest Popiełuszko did, he got a bullet.
“There seem to be three possible scenarios around which the history of the next half century will be written:
In the first, communism, meeting neither ideological nor political resistance from the West, continues along its present course to disarmament, then to convergence with the West on its own terms, and so to world domination.
In the second, the West realizes in time the nature of the communist threat, solves its own national problems, unites the noncom-munist world, and adopts a policy of open competition between the two systems; as a result, the peoples of the communist bloc repudiate their leaders and the communist empire disintegrates.
The third scenario resembles the second except that both systems remain intact and competition continues for a very long time.
And who shall say that unrelenting competition between two opposing systems of government, each secured by the nuclear deter- rent, would not prove fruitful? But where are the statesmen who will recognize this path to possible safety and guide their peoples along it?”
What he did not know is that Das Kapital created communism. And it’s convergence is via militarism and money. The ground work in the West had to be accomplished by World War and Cold War. Hawk JFK was not the right candidate and LBJ Pentagon enthusiast was. Nixon also brought down for challenging the Pentagon over bombing North Vietnam. Nixon demanded evidence it worked. Pentagon JCS threatened to step down. Only when head of JCS decided he would not, the others stayed on.
So this subversion goes to Federal Empire. In a sense the United States was the first Neo-Colonial nation. Of course this required a second war with England to keep the Neo-Colonial status from reverting to colony. https://www.garynorth.com/conspiracyinphiladelphia.pdf
This book is the history of a deception. I regard this deception as the greatest deception in American history. So successful was this deception that, as far as I know, this book is the first stand-alone volume to discuss it. The first version of this book appeared as Part 3 of Political Polytheism (1989), 201 years after the deception was ratified by representatives of the states, who created a new covenant and a new nation by their collective act of ratification-incorporation. This new covenant meant a new god. The ratification of the United States Constitution in 1787–88 was not an act of covenant renewal. It was an act of covenant-breaking: the substitution of a new covenant in the name of a new god. This was not understood at the time, but it has been understood by the humanists who have written the story of the Constitution. Nevertheless, they have not presented the history of the Constitutional Convention as a deception that was produced by a conspiracy. The spiritual heirs of the original victims of this deception remain unaware of the deception’s origins. Most of the heirs go about their business as if nothing unique had happened, just as the original victims did after 1788. But a few of the heirs rail against the humanistic historians who have told the story of the new American nation: a “grand experiment” in which the God of the Bible was first formally and publicly abandoned by any Western nation. They have argued that there was no deception, that America is still a Christian nation, that the Constitution “in principle” was and remains a Christian document, and it is only the nefarious work of the U.S. Supreme Court and the American Civil Liberties Union that has stripped the Constitution of its original Christian character. There is no greater deception than one which continues to deceive the victims, over two centuries after the deed was done. Political conservatives call for a return to the “original intent” of the Framers of the Constitution. If only, they say, we could just get back to original intent, things would be good once again. America would be restored.
The famous Lech Wałesa who supposedly ended communism in Poland, “did” so after meeting with Rockefellers. From archives:” Solidarity leader Lech Walesa kissed the hand of a Rockefeller and wowed a gathering of industrial leaders and union bigwigs on his triumphant arrival in the capital of the capitalist world.”
They sold Poland not freed it.
Sure because they were in sympathy not with Catholicism per se but Marxist Catholicism. And further this all is co-ordinated from above. As I recall from my reading the USSR never ended just shape shifted. What is interesting though is the erasure of old urls from like 2010. Archived if you can locate the text online.
https://thedukereport.com/books/red-cocaine-the-drugging-of-america-and-the-west/
==
In his 1984 book entitled, New Lies for Old, Committee for State Security (KGB) defector Anatoliy Golitsyn predicted a forthcoming fake democratization of communist bloc countries for the ultimate goal of deceiving and defeating the West. According to Golitsyn, Czechoslovakia played a significant role in the deception. The Prague Spring of 1968 was a communist provoked uprising that was to be replicated on a larger scale in the future. On 17 November 1989, Czechoslovak secret police provocateurs led an official communist student demonstration away from its approved course of march in Prague. When the police surrounded and viciously attacked the crowd of protestors, one of the secret police agents posed as a dead student. In only a few days the news of the alleged student killing led to a general uprising. It appears that some members of the Czechoslovak Communist Party and the Czechoslovak secret services, in cooperation with the Soviet secret service, planned, organized, and initiated the events of 17 November 1989, which marked the start of the Velvet Revolution. The Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia was not a genuine revolt of the Czech and Slovak people against the communist regime. Rather, it is the hypothesis of this paper that, as foreseen by Golitsyn, the revolution was a communist planned handing of power to new cadres as part of a long-term deception strategy designed to transform and unify Europe into a neutral socialist continent.
Thanks for the link! It has worked for them for hundreds of years, this magical trickster ability. It is always easy to spot too: after Wałesa met with them, he started being popular. When a famous priest Popiełuszko did, he got a bullet.
“There seem to be three possible scenarios around which the history of the next half century will be written:
In the first, communism, meeting neither ideological nor political resistance from the West, continues along its present course to disarmament, then to convergence with the West on its own terms, and so to world domination.
In the second, the West realizes in time the nature of the communist threat, solves its own national problems, unites the noncom-munist world, and adopts a policy of open competition between the two systems; as a result, the peoples of the communist bloc repudiate their leaders and the communist empire disintegrates.
The third scenario resembles the second except that both systems remain intact and competition continues for a very long time.
And who shall say that unrelenting competition between two opposing systems of government, each secured by the nuclear deter- rent, would not prove fruitful? But where are the statesmen who will recognize this path to possible safety and guide their peoples along it?”
—Anatoliy Golitsyn
What he did not know is that Das Kapital created communism. And it’s convergence is via militarism and money. The ground work in the West had to be accomplished by World War and Cold War. Hawk JFK was not the right candidate and LBJ Pentagon enthusiast was. Nixon also brought down for challenging the Pentagon over bombing North Vietnam. Nixon demanded evidence it worked. Pentagon JCS threatened to step down. Only when head of JCS decided he would not, the others stayed on.
Fascinating, but evil.
A.G. was correct, we have been subverted.
So this subversion goes to Federal Empire. In a sense the United States was the first Neo-Colonial nation. Of course this required a second war with England to keep the Neo-Colonial status from reverting to colony. https://www.garynorth.com/conspiracyinphiladelphia.pdf
This book is the history of a deception. I regard this deception as the greatest deception in American history. So successful was this deception that, as far as I know, this book is the first stand-alone volume to discuss it. The first version of this book appeared as Part 3 of Political Polytheism (1989), 201 years after the deception was ratified by representatives of the states, who created a new covenant and a new nation by their collective act of ratification-incorporation. This new covenant meant a new god. The ratification of the United States Constitution in 1787–88 was not an act of covenant renewal. It was an act of covenant-breaking: the substitution of a new covenant in the name of a new god. This was not understood at the time, but it has been understood by the humanists who have written the story of the Constitution. Nevertheless, they have not presented the history of the Constitutional Convention as a deception that was produced by a conspiracy. The spiritual heirs of the original victims of this deception remain unaware of the deception’s origins. Most of the heirs go about their business as if nothing unique had happened, just as the original victims did after 1788. But a few of the heirs rail against the humanistic historians who have told the story of the new American nation: a “grand experiment” in which the God of the Bible was first formally and publicly abandoned by any Western nation. They have argued that there was no deception, that America is still a Christian nation, that the Constitution “in principle” was and remains a Christian document, and it is only the nefarious work of the U.S. Supreme Court and the American Civil Liberties Union that has stripped the Constitution of its original Christian character. There is no greater deception than one which continues to deceive the victims, over two centuries after the deed was done. Political conservatives call for a return to the “original intent” of the Framers of the Constitution. If only, they say, we could just get back to original intent, things would be good once again. America would be restored.
I'll take a look at the book by Gary North.
—— S T I L L -—- ⁉️⁉️⁉️
— W H E R E I S
O’HARRIS …..
⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️