14 Comments
User's avatar
Stegiel's avatar

Legally no. Morally enough.

I was looking a bit today and yesterday for lab work proving mRNA inside vials but only the opposition tests vials. Everyone else, trusts and refuses to verify.

So far no results. I'd have to follow Flouride Free Peel and send out FOI requests.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Weird the reluctance to test the vile vials.

And believe the genocidal cabal's story of what's in them.

Funny though because mRNA was freaky enough. Hearing that mRNA what was in them stopped me getting them when they first came out.

Hard for them to spin a good story about GO, and of course since lack of testing they can say that there was no GO in the early ones.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Do these judges have any teeth.

Does one's heart good to see the criminals listed.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

I started on deleting the Substackers who call it a vaccine and go on about the spikes, but I have gotten stroppy and sidetracked and am being sooo presumptuous as to ask them about the GO.

Golly, will they fire me or blast me or put me on a train crash.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

On Dr. Alexander's site same. A few like my no virus, no mRNA. But Doc hustles spike salvation. Wellness Company. And worse hails Trump as Savior POTUS.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

I saw your link about Wellness Company selling spike medicine for big dollars.

They could sell graphene detoxer snake oil just as easily, but TPTB can't yet justify why all the GO.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

I think the way in is to politely ask if anyone they respect has proven A. mRNA and no GO in vial of any company and like the finding of GO has anyone else. Malone spoke of Magnetite, https://www.hindawi.com/journals/amse/2018/1390651/

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

Just mulling right now Loyal Opposition as human psychology. As so human an animal we are taught by our family and their peers community through time. Picking say 1923 as start I wonder how many generations each 20 year demographic can count backwards and if in 1923 very many can state anything about 1723, or even 1823. Begging our question of say birth in 1963 how far back past 1923 can many go in their family tradition. Attenuated connections.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Recipes maybe. Traditional food.

Although my mother's and grandmother's English cooking had most enthusiasm put in puddings and cakes, which are not essential to meal planning nowadays.

As a child it was my job to make custard every night to go on the baked or steamed dessert puddings that we always had. On a farm with lots of butter, cream and eggs.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Polite is a nice habit, but different moods are elicited by different Substacks, so I don't do copy paste, besides, that would be boring for me.

Had four or five likes on Jessica Rose now. To my surprise. No replies so no one keen to deny the GO and no one keen to develop the issue.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Someone on Jessica Rose just liked me asking why not focussing on GO.

GO for Golly gosh.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

I think the impact of such an admission is too great. DOD in control ought be the big tip. Dumb educated hold their views that are agreed and instilled, as if no US government entity would seek mass depopulation and sickness unto death. Or more on point is this even really governance or Stockholm Syndrome over generations breeding us like pet dogs.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Certainly the holding of official views is required for belonging to high society. Shunning keeps people in line.

When a view comes from elites then others who aspire to mix with the elite follow the cues.

Expand full comment