Tales of Horror and the Supernatural

Listen to me, little Red Ridin' Hood /I don't think little big girls should /Go walkin' in these spooky old woods alone

Many advisors to fiction writing exist. Some write. Some sell what they write. Others sell a bit then teach. I studied writing under these people. I was hypnotized. Writing is a craft. However the craft lies in the marketing more than the writing. Not that there is not room for improvement from revision but in my humble opinion the writer sculpts air, and so chisels from the soul and not the head. Ishmael Reed says “Writin’ is fightin’” and after all he is an author of a book on forty years of boxing. So he I listen to closely. Many others who I listened to I thank for what was shared but go back to Mr. Reed. Passion is crucial. Technique helps but not determinative. A fine novel tightly built without passion is dry as dust even with passages sparkling like silver minnow rapids with catfish jumping for joy in muggy heat in a summer sun of battering light.

2024 is passionless. That is the horror. The Supernatural of course continually present since 2020. And the beat goes on. In a stupor and bedazzled billions live. Live in deep fear of the Supernatural existence of the viral demon. The most educated are the hardest to disabuse for they are instructed by Authority. Dispassionate stony eyed authority unbending and rigid in complete OBEDIENCE to the cult teaching. The virus exists. Test to see. Vaccinate to prevent others who did so from dying. The stupidity is and can only be Supernatural. A Godless time GLOBALLY such as this, 5 billion or more souls caught up in it, never has come until 2020.

The fact is set before us that lies comprise the fact of existence. The second fact is believers in lies have no truth. Absent truth all is a lie. If all is a lie—-Carpe Diem and devil take the hindmost.

The twentieth-century German philosopher Martin Heidegger distinguished “meditative” (besinnlich) and “calculative” (rechnende) modes of thinking as a way of highlighting the problematique of modern technology and the limits of modern science. In doing so he also was prescient to recognize, in 1955, that the most significant danger to the future of humanity are developments in molecular biology and biotechnology, in contrast to the post-World War global threat of thermonuclear weapons. These insights are engaged here in view of recent discussion of the need for international regulation of heritable human genome editing and the announcement in 2018 of the birth of the world’s first gene-edited babies in China. Heidegger’s call for meditative thinking requires modern medicine and the life sciences to appropriate the phenomenological conception of the human “way to be” (Seinsweise) such that it is not restricted to the “present-at-hand” (vorhanden) physiology and pathology of the human body (Körper).

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40656-021-00380-z

10202020 COVID WAS NEVER ISOLATED - DR ANDREW KAUFMAN

[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

Koch's postulates are as follows: The bacteria must be present in every case of the disease. The bacteria must be isolated from the host with the disease and grown in pure culture. The specific disease must be reproduced when a pure culture of the bacteria is inoculated into a healthy susceptible host.

Rebuttal: Koch’s postulates, aka how to tell whether a microbe causes disease

Robert Koch is also famous for his “postulates”, the four conditions he and his mentor Jakob Henle postulated had to be met for a microbe to be considered the cause of a disease. It is these postulates that have now been discovered by the internet and (badly) applied to Covid-19. This is how Koch’s postulates were first laid out more than 130 years ago:

The organism must always be present, in every case of the disease.

The organism must be isolated from a host containing the disease and grown in pure culture.

Samples of the organism taken from pure culture must cause the same disease when inoculated into a healthy, susceptible animal in the laboratory.

The organism must be isolated from the inoculated animal and must be identified as the same original organism first isolated from the originally diseased host.

So, in the light of the 21st century how do the postulates hold up? Well, the first one was soon abandoned by Koch himself with the discovery that people could be asymptomatic carriers of the microbes responsible for cholera and typhoid fever. In the years since, we’ve come to understand that many microbes can live in and on people and only cause disease under certain circumstances. We’ve also come to understand that some microbes can set off a chain reaction that leads to disease long after the organism in question has been cleared by the immune system.

The second postulate should really read something like: it would be nice if the organism could be isolated and grown in pure culture. That’s because we don’t even know the conditions under which many microbes grow outside of their host. Take Mycobacterium leprae which causes leprosy. As far as we know, that can only grow in humans, nine-banded armadillos, and a mouse’s footpad. Just because we can’t grow it in pure culture doesn’t mean it isn’t responsible for leprosy. Indeed, using genomic sequencing, we know there are way more microbes than we’ve ever been able to grow in pure culture.

Obviously postulates three and four suffer from the same issue if the microbe can’t be grown in culture. Postulate three would also be better phrased as should cause the same disease when inoculated into a susceptible animal in the laboratory. I say should and specify susceptible because we also now know that some microbes can’t cause disease in a healthy host but can if the host is immune-compromised.

But wait! What about viruses?

The worst thing about Koch’s postulates is that they were formulated before viruses were known to exist. Viruses aren’t like the bacteria that Koch was busy discovering. Viruses need to take over a host cell to replicate. In other words, they turn cells into virus-producing factories. And depending on what proteins a virus has on its surface, it may only be able to infect very specific cells from certain host species, or a wide range of cells from lots of different species.

That’s why when virologists want to isolate a virus from a sample they’ll take the sample or some part of it and add it to some cells – usually ones that are relatively easy to grow in the lab – and then look to see if the cells die and/or if there are any virus particles released into the liquid nutrient bath the cells are growing in.

Rebuttal to rebuttal:

All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations … All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, the infected cells and tissues were dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab.”

” … the death of the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner when no “infected” genetic material is added at all. The virologists have apparently not noticed this fact. According to … scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out. In order to confirm the newly discovered method of so-called “virus propagation” … scientists would have had to perform additional experiments, called negative control experiments, in which they would add sterile substances … to the cell culture.”

“These control experiment have never been carried out by the official “science” to this day. During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with alleged “infected” material.”

Dr Stefan Lanka - ex-Virologist

CAMERA

“… a virus has never been isolated according to the meaning of the word isolation, and it has never been photographed and biochemically characterised as a whole unique structure. The electron micrographs of the alleged viruses show in reality quite normal cellular particles from dying tissues and cells, and most photos show only a computer model (CGI – computer generated images).”

-Dr Stefan Lanka - ex Virologist

What did Biden inject into the majority of our troops?

I read a lot of the early papers on covid and they claim they isolated the virus but if you understand what they did it was not purification.

Basically they looked at sputum and got dna fragments and claimed it was the virus. They never took it and made it and made a reinfection. It (the processes) seems very dark age to me. They might have just found exosoms. The part about finding the cleavage from the crisper and ADIS dosen't add up as well if you dig into it.

The Journal of Lingering Sanity is a reader-supported publication. Eking life out on a thin dime each day the Journal seeks to move you brightly with inspiration, originality, and wit.

Ko-fi.com/thejournaloflingeringsanity