(Edit:Apologies, I'm so used to seeing how vaccines are junk science that I assumed hers was also based on that virus theory dogma. )
I just smoked them and got sick from a vaccine for cancer... Lol
Haha the phd made a vaccine for cancer. Yeah that would work if cancer was really caused by a virus. It's not, even with hpv... It's caused by toxicity.
They'll spend so much money on genetics and vaccines but never address the real causes of cancer, one of which is still widely used: glyphosate (which is in most of our food, even organics).
But the industries that pollute will spend money on "finding a cure" because you can't sue viruses or genes for sickness, which is why ddt and other pesticides were not blamed for polio.
Coleys toxins has been around since 1890, well before viruses were postulated to exist.
It is a mixture of two heat-killed bacteria.
Dendritic cells which are part of your immune system have toll-like receptors on their surfaces which bind a diversity of molecules: some of these receptors bind both bacterial molecules and cancer antigens. In other words, the bacterial molecules (lipopolysaccharide, cpg sequences, streptolysin, flagellin, etc.) are a means of waking up the immune system to the cancer’s presence.
This vaccine is not used for the prevention of any infectious disease and has been impossible to patent this far. That’s why pharma doesn’t fund it.
Interesting. I've heard of alternative treatments that do the same.
As long as we understand that it's caused by toxins, we're going to succeed!
But when I see a lot of researchers have a narrow focus on the viral cause of cancer, it makes me skeptical. Virus theory is full of holes, Liam Scheff (of AIDS/HIV journalism) made a funny point that 99% of those that have hpv never get cervical cancer, lol. But somehow the same industry that ignored your information is pushing gardasil etc.
Disappointing to see that I’m a target of a substack author I previously enjoyed. I hope you’ll see my comment to Robert and revisit your assessment. Cheers
Just to reiterate, you slandered me by insinuating I’m an accomplice to liars, then encouraged people to “smoke” my substack. Whatever this means. Then you want to claim you don’t attack people. Whoever your mother was, she apparently did not teach manners. This is a far greater sun than believing in a virus.
Does it mean to “sic” your supporters on someone? That’s my guess.
And why don’t you use your real name instead of hiding behind a fake one like a coward?
And what does any of this have to do with virology?
You should be ashamed of yourself. Bad enough dealing with the government but then we have to deal with trolls who are supposedly in our side in this fight against medical tyranny.
But thanks for pointing people to my Substack! Negative attention is still publicity. 😏
Apologies, I'm so used to seeing how vaccines are junk science that I assumed yours was also based on that virus theory dogma. No wonder why they blocked your discovery.
Ok. I use my real name. Charles Stegiel. Hell you can find me posting for years on FB using my name. Posting mostly on Covid lately, stupidity of government prior and still, and yes I am opposed to all Tyranny.
However if the injury arises from my statement, virology is fraud, if it is not why not?
I type what I think and if this injured you by saying virology is fraud then rebut the opinion. I in no way attacked. For you to mis-read this as such must mean extra sensitivity on your part or a touch of paranoia. I have no reason to attack you, or discredit you. Zero. I encountered your substack and thought I would share it as worth reading.
Secondly a play on substack obviously is smoke stack. I did only intend to point to two substacks worth reading.. I think perhaps the issue here is misunderstanding. I am not an M.D. I have no training in biology, nor for that matter science. I do have opinions and I think they are grounded on facts.
So then, I am not wishing to be your enemy, or "sic" people on you, I apologize for creating this impression.
(Edit:Apologies, I'm so used to seeing how vaccines are junk science that I assumed hers was also based on that virus theory dogma. )
I just smoked them and got sick from a vaccine for cancer... Lol
Haha the phd made a vaccine for cancer. Yeah that would work if cancer was really caused by a virus. It's not, even with hpv... It's caused by toxicity.
They'll spend so much money on genetics and vaccines but never address the real causes of cancer, one of which is still widely used: glyphosate (which is in most of our food, even organics).
But the industries that pollute will spend money on "finding a cure" because you can't sue viruses or genes for sickness, which is why ddt and other pesticides were not blamed for polio.
Hi Rob, you seem to be confused.
Coleys toxins has been around since 1890, well before viruses were postulated to exist.
It is a mixture of two heat-killed bacteria.
Dendritic cells which are part of your immune system have toll-like receptors on their surfaces which bind a diversity of molecules: some of these receptors bind both bacterial molecules and cancer antigens. In other words, the bacterial molecules (lipopolysaccharide, cpg sequences, streptolysin, flagellin, etc.) are a means of waking up the immune system to the cancer’s presence.
This vaccine is not used for the prevention of any infectious disease and has been impossible to patent this far. That’s why pharma doesn’t fund it.
Interesting. I've heard of alternative treatments that do the same.
As long as we understand that it's caused by toxins, we're going to succeed!
But when I see a lot of researchers have a narrow focus on the viral cause of cancer, it makes me skeptical. Virus theory is full of holes, Liam Scheff (of AIDS/HIV journalism) made a funny point that 99% of those that have hpv never get cervical cancer, lol. But somehow the same industry that ignored your information is pushing gardasil etc.
Exactly. A con game like virology.
Disappointing to see that I’m a target of a substack author I previously enjoyed. I hope you’ll see my comment to Robert and revisit your assessment. Cheers
Monica I hope you do not think I attack anyone. As a lay person my understanding is virology is quite suspect. https://crazzfiles.com/virology-fake-science/
And -https://www.thebernician.net/the-deception-of-virology-vaccines-why-coronavirus-is-not-contagious-2/
My understanding of medical history is Rockefeller interests took over medical education and the AMA. https://truthinplainsight.com/the-rockefellers-the-flexner-report-the-ama-and-their-effect-on-alternative-nutritional-botanical-medicine/
Just to reiterate, you slandered me by insinuating I’m an accomplice to liars, then encouraged people to “smoke” my substack. Whatever this means. Then you want to claim you don’t attack people. Whoever your mother was, she apparently did not teach manners. This is a far greater sun than believing in a virus.
No, he meant to take the info and smoke it, to absorb it. A good thing.
I was just pointing out a misunderstanding that you clarified, that it's about bacteria, not the virus theory that he and I see is fraudulent.
“Monica I hope you do not think I attack anyone.”
Oh? Sounds like a steaming pile of bullshit.
What does it mean to “smoke” a Substack?
Does it mean to “sic” your supporters on someone? That’s my guess.
And why don’t you use your real name instead of hiding behind a fake one like a coward?
And what does any of this have to do with virology?
You should be ashamed of yourself. Bad enough dealing with the government but then we have to deal with trolls who are supposedly in our side in this fight against medical tyranny.
But thanks for pointing people to my Substack! Negative attention is still publicity. 😏
Apologies, I'm so used to seeing how vaccines are junk science that I assumed yours was also based on that virus theory dogma. No wonder why they blocked your discovery.
Ok. I use my real name. Charles Stegiel. Hell you can find me posting for years on FB using my name. Posting mostly on Covid lately, stupidity of government prior and still, and yes I am opposed to all Tyranny.
However if the injury arises from my statement, virology is fraud, if it is not why not?
I type what I think and if this injured you by saying virology is fraud then rebut the opinion. I in no way attacked. For you to mis-read this as such must mean extra sensitivity on your part or a touch of paranoia. I have no reason to attack you, or discredit you. Zero. I encountered your substack and thought I would share it as worth reading.
Secondly a play on substack obviously is smoke stack. I did only intend to point to two substacks worth reading.. I think perhaps the issue here is misunderstanding. I am not an M.D. I have no training in biology, nor for that matter science. I do have opinions and I think they are grounded on facts.
So then, I am not wishing to be your enemy, or "sic" people on you, I apologize for creating this impression.
Oh. Now I feel like an idiot! I guess I need to get familiar with the lingo used by younguns these days. 🤪
I don’t care what people believe about viruses and perhaps I will write about this topic soon.