Night Thoughts of an old tired man
Israel and Iran: I & I. Globalist chess pieces for 2030 and all that
I am thinking this is a war like Ukraine. To some degree overall managed though the individual power actor we see may not be a manager. In other words no Armistice is possible. Lucrative Destruction must not stop. The invisible have a goal. The West likes protracted expensive wars for resources. Netty acted. He kept his job by one ultra orthodox vote. His deal was exempting Yeshiva students from conscription. A connection? Probably. Invisible to the eyes of all but a few. His keeping power was permission to act forcefully. I think but do not know the deep bond twixt Zionist colonialism and the USA is connected to this vote. So Netty acts to bring USA into the war. He knew this had to be done. For Zionism to triumph. Even if 1 million died in the new Shoah this is a sacrifice required from Israel because Abraham refused God his sacrifice. He was beguiled by Satan say the Zionists. Per propaganda not many lambs havedied thus more war must happen. Infrastructure down yes. Terror yes. Anger yes. All so easily predictable. Tit for Tat. Deaths not so high. Which too is curious.
I&I say “You do this to my homeland and I do this to yours. Which government falls first?” All this seems to point to color revolution in Iran. This is the goal. Restoration of the Peacock Throne. Under the Aegis of European industrial interests. So war to reach this goal and boot Netty out AFTER the Armistice.
WW1 ending La Belle Époque revealed ours is the time of malignant Dwarf Titans. Virilio offers a genealogy in which civil society (originally the city) was actually twin-born with military society from pre-civilized “tumults” of all-against-all violence. He posits this in contradistinction to the model of trade as the basis for civilization. According to him, war has evolved from tactics (pre-martial violence), through strategy (control of space), to logistics (control of time). The global fruition of logistics is the “pure war” in which humanity is increasingly subject to a non-human technological agenda predicated on abstract, hyperreal conflict.
When men think of history as a process that they can control, they make war on the person, as such – the person validated by the words and deeds of Christ, in whom alone the human creature can find its dignity. Berdyaev observes how “it is noteworthy that at a time when every religious sanction of authority has vanished, we live in a very authoritarian epoch.” The point In Berdyaev’s interpretation, modernity thinks that it can reverse Adam’s fall and reestablish paradise, but it only blindly and dumbly reenacts that fall. It is a case of titanic hubris and of equally titanic nemesis. “The world war and the revolutionary processes which have followed it have a metaphysical significance for the fate of man.” The war put on display, bloodily and destructive, the demonic inhumanity that had long simmered under the veneer of civilization; it showed that the modern utopian conceit expressed a fundamental nihilism which, discovering that it could not create on a godlike level, turned its fury on creation, especially the human portion of that creation, and sought its annihilation. “The war revealed the personality of our civilization,” Berdyaev writes; “it cheapened life, it taught man to take no thought for human life and personality, to consider them as means and instruments in the hands of the fatality of history.” That term personality operates centrally in Berdyaev’s Christian anthropology. WHAT strikes Berdyaev as sufficiently important that he repeats it in variorum a few lines later: “The tragedy of the situation lies in the fact that great masses of humanity have awakened and come into power at the moment of a falling away from Christianity and the loss of all religious beliefs.
Max Picard writes: "In every age man has been in flight from God. What distinguishes the Flight today from every other flight is this: once Faith was the universal, and prior to the individual; there was an objective world of Faith, while the flight was only accomplished subjectively, within the individual man. It came into being through the individual man's separating himself from the world of Faith by an act of decision. A man who wanted to flee had first to make his own flight. The opposite is true today. The objective and eternal world of Faith is no more; it is Faith which has to be remade moment by moment through the individual's act of decision, that is to say, through the individual cutting himself off from the world of the Flight.”
"Propaganda is a soft weapon; hold it in your hands too long, and it will move about like a snake, and strike the other way."
Jean Anouilh
I could never take shelter in any religion; every one of them would have burned me at the stake or worse for being who I am, herbalist, bisexual, secular, at some point in history. Most recently, the churches encouraged folks to get jabbed up, so they are all in on the culling, in their hushhush way.
Very good post.
That it's a modern myth that life is valued.