There has been limited analysis and data on cancers being caused by the COVID mRNA vaccines. Now comes a creative new analysis by Ronald Kostoff. The article title is: Are COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Cancer Rare Events?
Here is one statement that caught my attention: “Applying the URF [unreported fraction] of ~100 from the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care study, and the 1/3 fraction from the autopsy results to the post-COVID-19 vaccine VAERS cancer-related numbers yields a total of about 83,000 cancer-related events post-COVID-19 vaccination (so far).”
Here are a few excerpts:
COVID-19 vaccine-induced cancer has been judged a “rare” event by the major promoters of these vaccines (caveat: these injections prevent neither infection nor viral transmission). To ascertain the frequency of COVID-19 vaccine-induced cancers, we have examined the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database for reports of cancers. Since cancers tend to have a long latency period, we have also addressed the issue of Early Warning Indicators that could identify COVID-19 vaccine-induced cancers on or over the horizon. Finally, we have compared cancers reported following COVID-19 vaccines with those reported following influenza vaccines for similar numbers of vaccine doses delivered.
While imperfect, VAERS is a reasonable system for identifying safety signals related to vaccines. One major VAERS deficiency is that only a small fraction of vaccine-related adverse events is reported to VAERS. A study by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, using electronic tracking, showed that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” This is an average value over all adverse events; it may be far worse for cancer.
Before presenting the numbers, we need to define what is a cancer-related event reported in VAERS. Is it 1) a biomarker associated with the eventual emergence of cancer, 2) a group of biomarkers reflecting pre-clinical cancer, 3) a newly-diagnosed cancer, 4) a cancer that has been exacerbated, or 5) a cancer death? While all five are valid candidates, the present study concentrates on items 3) and 4).
This restriction to items 3) and 4) substantially under-reports the COVID-19 vaccine adverse events that may eventually result in cancer, because it excludes abnormalities in cancer risk biomarkers.
There were ~330 different cancer-related adverse events reported in VAERS for the COVID-19 vaccines, with ~2500 total number of events. Converting these VAERS entries to real-world numbers of COVID-19 vaccine-induced cancers requires three major assumptions, and some minor ones. The major assumptions are 1) the cancers reported in VAERS following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines is, in fact, caused in part or in whole by the COVID-19 vaccines, 2) the under-reporting factor (URF) to be used for cancer scale-up to real-world numbers can be approximated for very conservative estimation purposes by the Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare URFs, and 3) the fraction of the VAERS entries to which the URF should be applied can be approximated by autopsy results for fraction of post-COVID-19 vaccine deaths that can be attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine.
Assumption 1) is based on mechanistic studies that show the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (those distributed most widely in the USA) destroy the innate immune system, including those components that surveille and control the growth of cancers. One of the specific mechanisms demonstrated in very recent mechanistic studies (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798 and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36713457/) is that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines increase the fraction of IgG4 antibodies and decrease the fraction of IgG3 antibodies, and the effect increases as the number of vaccine doses increase. This IgG3/IgG4 ratio shift is favorable for increasing tolerance to allergens but can also support increased malignancy. Based on the above and many other recent study results, the question we should ask about the COVID-19 vaccines should not be i) why would we expect that these vaccines contribute to cancer development, but rather ii) why would we expect they would not contribute to cancer development, given their demonstrated destruction of those components of the innate immune system responsible for controlling the development of cancer! https://alethonews.com/2023/02/20/horrible-health-impacts-of-covid-vaccines-keep-worsening/
Interesting article. I learned this in the Army as a young man seeking a way to further my education. If you swim against the Tide, you will drown. If you swim with the tide, you may be washed to sea. If you swim near the banks, you have some degree of control in the matter. Good lesson to learn at 18 years old.
At 19 in college for 8 weeks of Army ROTC at Ft. Knox under the impression that by virtue of doing so I pleased parents, visited my Kentucky cousins, and perhaps got into Cal. Upon exit I was dubious as to the life expectancy of a combat tank unit officer. Got married. Went a totally different path by 21.
Shoulder missiles. Light Anti-Tank Weapons. Armor was very easy to target and shooter could be a sniper. So even if not destroyed badly damaged. Most ironic is this is 1976 so imagine today. For combatant there is better delivery off shoulder and superior munitions.
Dear Steigel...I'm very sorry to hear of your friend's depleting condition. I was working 12-hour shifts five days a week and only saw my second husband once in Hospice. He passed within a week because he wanted to do so. The nurse advised me that she had never seen anyone go as fast as he was going. Of course, he was a Buddhist as I am. He knew the material body relatively unimportant as Death approaches and that much Life lives beyond.
There's a ex-CIA analyst who has a YT channel, and occasionally, I'll see an entry on my YT page. He's quite cynical. He believes 80% of humans can't "make it" in the world: if I understand him correctly, he values human beings only for what they produce. Such production would involve a Elon-Muskian output.
He has no understanding of life or spirituality. He's the New Renaissance Man. He knows how to manipulate people and situations. He knows how to push his will within a heavy materialistic world. He knows, by leaving the country, how to protect his young and give them "an edge."
In other words, he knows nothing about life.
I've learned one very important lesson which resides within my Heart and Being. Nothing goes to waste. No effort in life is wasted. We can harken back to the old principle "Energy is neither created nor destroyed" if we like. Nothing in any man's life is wasted. Nothing. I cannot emphasize this truth enough.
Indeed, many high spiritual philosophies described the most progressive lives as those quite ordinary with no worldly acclaim.
Your friend has learned and is learning some remarkable lessons. I take off my hat and salute him. I give him praise. He will live in another day, and these lessons will benefit him. He is Eternal. There is no Death. He is a Great Being.
Is he climbing Cold Mountain? How miraculous!!
He must be inviting us.
"Clambering up the Cold Mountain Path,
The Cold Mountain Trail goes on and on:
The long gorge choked with scree and boulders,
The wide cree, the mist-blurred grass.
The moss is slippery, though there’s been no rain.
True. Right thought though leads to right action. It is possible to have an idea of the Best. Through our attention to our actions. There is a Hasidic folk story Jung greatly liked about attention. In an interview on his 80th birthday, Jung says,
"But do you know who anticipated my entire psychology in the eighteenth century? TheHassidic Rabbi Baer from Meseritz, whom they called the Great Maggid. He was a most impressive man."
Regarding the Great Maggid of Mezeritch whom Jung called his predecessor :
"To Say Torah and to Be Torah "
Rabbi Leib, the hidden zaddik who wandered over the earth, following the course of rivers in order to redeem the souls of the living and the dead, said this: "I did not go to the Great Maggid in order to hear Torah from him, but to see him unlace his boots and lace them up again."
Cancer
There has been limited analysis and data on cancers being caused by the COVID mRNA vaccines. Now comes a creative new analysis by Ronald Kostoff. The article title is: Are COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Cancer Rare Events?
Here is one statement that caught my attention: “Applying the URF [unreported fraction] of ~100 from the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care study, and the 1/3 fraction from the autopsy results to the post-COVID-19 vaccine VAERS cancer-related numbers yields a total of about 83,000 cancer-related events post-COVID-19 vaccination (so far).”
Here are a few excerpts:
COVID-19 vaccine-induced cancer has been judged a “rare” event by the major promoters of these vaccines (caveat: these injections prevent neither infection nor viral transmission). To ascertain the frequency of COVID-19 vaccine-induced cancers, we have examined the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database for reports of cancers. Since cancers tend to have a long latency period, we have also addressed the issue of Early Warning Indicators that could identify COVID-19 vaccine-induced cancers on or over the horizon. Finally, we have compared cancers reported following COVID-19 vaccines with those reported following influenza vaccines for similar numbers of vaccine doses delivered.
While imperfect, VAERS is a reasonable system for identifying safety signals related to vaccines. One major VAERS deficiency is that only a small fraction of vaccine-related adverse events is reported to VAERS. A study by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, using electronic tracking, showed that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” This is an average value over all adverse events; it may be far worse for cancer.
Before presenting the numbers, we need to define what is a cancer-related event reported in VAERS. Is it 1) a biomarker associated with the eventual emergence of cancer, 2) a group of biomarkers reflecting pre-clinical cancer, 3) a newly-diagnosed cancer, 4) a cancer that has been exacerbated, or 5) a cancer death? While all five are valid candidates, the present study concentrates on items 3) and 4).
This restriction to items 3) and 4) substantially under-reports the COVID-19 vaccine adverse events that may eventually result in cancer, because it excludes abnormalities in cancer risk biomarkers.
There were ~330 different cancer-related adverse events reported in VAERS for the COVID-19 vaccines, with ~2500 total number of events. Converting these VAERS entries to real-world numbers of COVID-19 vaccine-induced cancers requires three major assumptions, and some minor ones. The major assumptions are 1) the cancers reported in VAERS following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines is, in fact, caused in part or in whole by the COVID-19 vaccines, 2) the under-reporting factor (URF) to be used for cancer scale-up to real-world numbers can be approximated for very conservative estimation purposes by the Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare URFs, and 3) the fraction of the VAERS entries to which the URF should be applied can be approximated by autopsy results for fraction of post-COVID-19 vaccine deaths that can be attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine.
Assumption 1) is based on mechanistic studies that show the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (those distributed most widely in the USA) destroy the innate immune system, including those components that surveille and control the growth of cancers. One of the specific mechanisms demonstrated in very recent mechanistic studies (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798 and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36713457/) is that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines increase the fraction of IgG4 antibodies and decrease the fraction of IgG3 antibodies, and the effect increases as the number of vaccine doses increase. This IgG3/IgG4 ratio shift is favorable for increasing tolerance to allergens but can also support increased malignancy. Based on the above and many other recent study results, the question we should ask about the COVID-19 vaccines should not be i) why would we expect that these vaccines contribute to cancer development, but rather ii) why would we expect they would not contribute to cancer development, given their demonstrated destruction of those components of the innate immune system responsible for controlling the development of cancer! https://alethonews.com/2023/02/20/horrible-health-impacts-of-covid-vaccines-keep-worsening/
Interesting article. I learned this in the Army as a young man seeking a way to further my education. If you swim against the Tide, you will drown. If you swim with the tide, you may be washed to sea. If you swim near the banks, you have some degree of control in the matter. Good lesson to learn at 18 years old.
At 19 in college for 8 weeks of Army ROTC at Ft. Knox under the impression that by virtue of doing so I pleased parents, visited my Kentucky cousins, and perhaps got into Cal. Upon exit I was dubious as to the life expectancy of a combat tank unit officer. Got married. Went a totally different path by 21.
Oh yeah, you couldn’t get me in a tank to save my life. No thank you, I’d rather be behind it.
Is it the cramped aspect of tanks or something else?
Shoulder missiles. Light Anti-Tank Weapons. Armor was very easy to target and shooter could be a sniper. So even if not destroyed badly damaged. Most ironic is this is 1976 so imagine today. For combatant there is better delivery off shoulder and superior munitions.
Yeah! You stand out like a sore thumb! Everyone knows your there. The Big Boys are gonna jump your ass any moment. Otherwise, no problem. Lol.
I feel it. Assimilate or get eaten.
They are trying to suck our brains and souls out.
Dear Steigel...I'm very sorry to hear of your friend's depleting condition. I was working 12-hour shifts five days a week and only saw my second husband once in Hospice. He passed within a week because he wanted to do so. The nurse advised me that she had never seen anyone go as fast as he was going. Of course, he was a Buddhist as I am. He knew the material body relatively unimportant as Death approaches and that much Life lives beyond.
There's a ex-CIA analyst who has a YT channel, and occasionally, I'll see an entry on my YT page. He's quite cynical. He believes 80% of humans can't "make it" in the world: if I understand him correctly, he values human beings only for what they produce. Such production would involve a Elon-Muskian output.
He has no understanding of life or spirituality. He's the New Renaissance Man. He knows how to manipulate people and situations. He knows how to push his will within a heavy materialistic world. He knows, by leaving the country, how to protect his young and give them "an edge."
In other words, he knows nothing about life.
I've learned one very important lesson which resides within my Heart and Being. Nothing goes to waste. No effort in life is wasted. We can harken back to the old principle "Energy is neither created nor destroyed" if we like. Nothing in any man's life is wasted. Nothing. I cannot emphasize this truth enough.
Indeed, many high spiritual philosophies described the most progressive lives as those quite ordinary with no worldly acclaim.
Your friend has learned and is learning some remarkable lessons. I take off my hat and salute him. I give him praise. He will live in another day, and these lessons will benefit him. He is Eternal. There is no Death. He is a Great Being.
Is he climbing Cold Mountain? How miraculous!!
He must be inviting us.
"Clambering up the Cold Mountain Path,
The Cold Mountain Trail goes on and on:
The long gorge choked with scree and boulders,
The wide cree, the mist-blurred grass.
The moss is slippery, though there’s been no rain.
The pine sings, but there’s no wind.
Who can leap the world’s ties
and sit with me among the white clouds?"
Hi Honeybee,
I'm currently enjoying reading your Substack.
A good resource for Club of Rome quotes and The Economist as predictive programming.
I like your remark above about Musk as neo Renaissance man.
Also about nothing that we do is wasted - I'll have to figure out how that will make me feel better about doing boring jobs or hanging around waiting.
Cheers,
Cairn
Thank you for your kind comments!
Nice to find a new author to read.
Thank you Stegiel for telling us about your friend. I am sorry for your soon to come loss of his conversation and empathy.
So many things we do that accumulate into a trap of our own making.
True. Right thought though leads to right action. It is possible to have an idea of the Best. Through our attention to our actions. There is a Hasidic folk story Jung greatly liked about attention. In an interview on his 80th birthday, Jung says,
"But do you know who anticipated my entire psychology in the eighteenth century? TheHassidic Rabbi Baer from Meseritz, whom they called the Great Maggid. He was a most impressive man."
Regarding the Great Maggid of Mezeritch whom Jung called his predecessor :
"To Say Torah and to Be Torah "
Rabbi Leib, the hidden zaddik who wandered over the earth, following the course of rivers in order to redeem the souls of the living and the dead, said this: "I did not go to the Great Maggid in order to hear Torah from him, but to see him unlace his boots and lace them up again."
This seems to tie into Honey bee comment below.
It's all a bit too Zen for me to understand but I appreciate your response.
Hers a song for this dear woman.
https://youtu.be/5-8D5ILlhNE?si=if8B0NkCYOcVgbby