I am unsurprised. Overall intelligence is not inclined to question authority deeply. Only the bent brains who wonder why. And to rise in the world of work asking hard questions is only okay for profit not okay for uncovering graft by key officers backed by key shareholders.
Researchers discover that once graphene enters the lungs the immune system has trouble getting rid of it. Graphene nanoplatelets can penetrate deeper into the lungs than their size would suggest, say UK researchers. And once there, the body’s natural defences cannot deal with them effectively. Chronic exposure could therefore lead to inflammation and disease in a similar way to asbestos fibres.
Why would you put it in EVERY MASK?
a German study found clear evidence that if discrete nanometer diameter particles were deposited in the nasal region (in rodents in this case), they completely circumvented the blood/brain barrier, and travelled up the olfactory nerves straight into the brain
Why would you stick it a graphene PCR test into the brain and why would you inhale it for 3 years from your graphene-bio-mass masks?
• inhaled carbon nanotubes can suppress the immune system by affecting the function of T cells, a type of white blood cell that organises the immune system to fight infections.
And this is COVID and all other now common respiratory problems
For example, studies have established that the comparatively large surface area of inhaled nanoparticles can increase their toxicity. Such small particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and may move to other parts of the body, including the liver and brain.
A major study published in Nature Nanotechnology in May 2008 suggested some forms of carbon nanotubes could be as harmful as asbestos if inhaled in sufficient quantities.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32539642/ Applications of nanomaterials cause a general concern on their toxicity when they intentionally (such as in medicine) or unintentionally (environment exposure) enter into the human body. As a special subpopulation, pregnant women are more susceptible to nanoparticle (NP)-induced toxicity. More importantly, prenatal exposures may affect the entire life of the fetus. Through blood circulation, NPs may cross placental barriers and enter into fetus. A cascade of events, such as damage in placental barriers, generation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered gene expression, may induce delayed or abnormal fetal development. The physicochemical properties of NPs, exposure time, and other factors directly affect nanotoxicity in pregnant populations. Even though results from animal studies cannot directly extrapolate to humans, compelling evidence has already shown that, for pregnant women, caution must be taken when dealing with nanomedicines or NP pollutants.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2017.00606/full In the last two decades, nanotechnologies demonstrated various applications in different fields, including detection, sensing, catalysis, electronics, and biomedical sciences. However, public concerns regarding the well-being of human may hinder the wide utilization of this promising innovation. Although, humans are exposed to airborne nanosized particles from an early age, exposure to such particles has risen dramatically within the last century due to anthropogenic sources of nanoparticles. The wide application of nanomaterials in industry, consumer products, and medicine has raised concerns regarding the potential toxicity of nanoparticles in humans. In this review, the effects of nanomaterials on the reproductive system in animal models are discussed. Females are particularly more vulnerable to nanoparticle toxicity, and toxicity in this population may affect reproductivity and fetal development. Moreover, various types of nanoparticles have negative impacts on male germ cells, fetal development, and the female reproductive system. These impacts are associated with nanoparticle modification, composition, concentration, route of administration, and the species of the animal. Therefore, understanding the impacts of nanoparticles on animal growth and reproduction is essential. Many studies have examined the effects of nanoparticles on primary and secondary target organs, with a concentration on the in vivo and in vitro effects of nanoparticles on the male and female reproductive systems at the clinical, cellular, and molecular levels.
Because of their small size, NP can penetrate into the circulatory system and directly propagate into cells thus causing different interactions with cellular organelles. While the toxicity of NP and their effect on embryonic mortality and developmental defects have recently been in focus, the exact toxic mechanism is still unclear, and only a few studies have centered their attention on the cellular response in embryos [Sawosz et al., 2009; Shimizu et al., 2009; Xia et al., 2011; Park et al., 2013].
The toxicity of NP can be explained by their different biological activities, including oxidative stress that damages lipids, carbohydrates, proteins and DNA. Moreover, their penetration into mitochondria, activation of the immune response and changes in receptor or ion channel functions after NP incorporation must be considered. Also, interactions of NP with enzymes, potential apoptotic or necrotic factors and also induction of inflammatory processes must be taken into account [Kohen and Nyska, 2002; Yeo and Kang, 2009; Park et al., 2011, 2013; Zhao et al., 2013]. Furthermore, NP show virus-like properties, which can cause DNA damage and delays in cell proliferation [Asharani et al., 2008a]. Furthermore, they can reduce mitochondrial function [Chen and Schluesener, 2008] and generate cellular morphological abnormalities [Hussain et al., 2005]. The mechanism of NP toxicity can also vary among different types of NP, depending on their chemical composition [Buzea et al., 2007].
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0748233720918689 Applications of nanomaterials cause a general concern on their toxicity when they intentionally (such as in medicine) or unintentionally (environment exposure) enter into the human body. As a special subpopulation, pregnant women are more susceptible to nanoparticle (NP)-induced toxicity. More importantly, prenatal exposures may affect the entire life of the fetus. Through blood circulation, NPs may cross placental barriers and enter into fetus. A cascade of events, such as damage in placental barriers, generation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered gene expression, may induce delayed or abnormal fetal development. The physicochemical properties of NPs, exposure time, and other factors directly affect nanotoxicity in pregnant populations. Even though results from animal studies cannot directly extrapolate to humans, compelling evidence has already shown that, for pregnant women, caution must be taken when dealing with nanomedicines or NP pollutants.
Etc.
So, graphene is USED in MASK - just google masks graphene - images - ALL MASKS CONTAIN GRAPHENE
In PCR tests - no wonder they insert these swabs close to brain not lungs - as there is a direct translocation of nanotech
Well you know in this global ghetto perpetrators must answer to other perpetrators and that's why we have the human condition. Who can bell the cat? People United. Do they unite now? No. If not now, then maybe when they are walking zombies? Pentagon trained for the Zombie Apocalypse. Perhaps some Colonel goes berserker and shoots other officers but stage a coup and bring us Justice I doubt. And nothing less really than a wholesale change of mind by millions could.
Was there ever any truth in the early iterations of the injections "reducing severity" of the Covid?
If not then there really has been a lot of duping by a whole lot of controlled opposition.
I am thinking that the "social distancing" and prison lockdowns are what gave the impression of the injections working, because we didn't see sick people.
I wonder if you, justifiably outraged one, have a version of your above comment on your website.
That's another problem, every individual whom we come across, who needs a wake-up call, seems to need one especially tailored to them.
As does the rabbi in Stegiel's story.
We also know that, spend hours on it, and they will just think one is a trouble maker and they won't read it.
"Conspiracy theorist" has now become an MSM descriptor of suburban running amok shooters.
No evidence of efficacy. After all it is only the flu. Social Distance and isolation failed as well as did masking. None of this is medically sound and masks make you inhale what you exhale so if you are sick you get sicker. Of course everyone virtue signals with masks thinking they offer protection. And since what is injected makes immune systems crash this clearly is not intelligent. Alas the average intelligence of the best and brightest is not very high generally speaking outside area of expertise and among the medical profession perhaps worse. Last year I was mugged and went to doc to check out my elbow that hurt. He was masked, and worse wore a plastic shield over the mask. He was shocked I refused vaccination and I was shocked he needed a plastic face shield and mask and was concerned my mask was not worn correctly.
Three blocks from home in front of the local drug store on a sunny Saturday afternoon in what once was a vibrant neighborhood of hotels and restaurants. I had two shopping bags and a backpack. I put them down briefly just after clearing doorway to adjust weight as Judith and I walked home. Some old crazed black guy who had exited before me decided that I was stealing his bags and tried to take them. He knocked me on my back half in street and choked and punched me as bystanders watched and Judith finally got security guard to get him off me. I was shaken but lucky since I easily could be dead or lost an eye. SF is soft on crime so he got one year probation and a restraining order. :).
If you insert a toxin, of course your immune system fights it off, so for a while there are more antibodies, but Spike Protein is a fairy tale in terms of giving you immunity. You're basically upsetting the response of your immune system, but it doesn't actually protect you, you can just get the effect of temporarily increased immunity, because the immune system fights back, sending out its armies against the toxin.
That is, it actually leads to loss of immunity, destroys the immune system
That's it as I understand it.
That's why there is vaccine enhanced disease afterwards:
I can understand how upsetting this would have been for your wife.
It's looking like she is being shunned.
Maybe a different rabbi at a different synagogue, but religion is an habitual exercise, and habits don't take easily to change.
Religion being obviously faith based, implies that the adherents are trusting types, and therefore the lower level religious soldiers will trust the messages from their superiors.
Not likely that this rabbi will want to rock any arks nor want those who receive his received wisdom to do any rocking either.
I realise that your wife is of advanced years, but also very intelligent; can she move herself to a new sort of freedom, from awareness of the flawed hierarchy she has been subjected to.
(I'm not trying to be a know-all, just trying to put myself in different shoes.)
We went to a different Congregation this evening that is the brother of the the other as both founded at same time by the same community but split in 19th century over something or other and to be honest I forgot. The one tonight is more or less distinctly less affluent and warmer. They once required masking and vaccines but do not now though the bulk of the fifty people tonight masked to my great amusement. She was happy to have a live service. We recognized people including one former co-worker of ours from SF Opera. Due to Covid raging in Bay Area attendance across the board is less than 3 years ago everywhere and Zoom rules. They had a Hanukkah party which disappointed me. I expected food for $20 per head not salad and latkes. They did have live music which was good. The wine terrible even though it was California wine. Despite my diabetes to assuage my hunger I had a good old Anchor Stem beer. And yes adherents are trusting types. Quite like normal consumers who rely on a trusted celeb to endorse something. Which is something I never have been able to grasp. I cannot think why if Jane Doe likes a brand of ice cream or shoes or anything else I ought to as well.
Depends. I think more frail and bewildered arises from the post modern life. If the person were rural on farm or ranch likely less so. Even urban differs though. I knew an artist in his 70's working construction and he was a smoker.
Idolizing never was my strong suit. As a child I did have a lunch box with astronauts I thought was cool. Aside from that indifferent to fame, celebrity, heroism.
I am unsurprised. Overall intelligence is not inclined to question authority deeply. Only the bent brains who wonder why. And to rise in the world of work asking hard questions is only okay for profit not okay for uncovering graft by key officers backed by key shareholders.
Too true.
Public servant scams too, where a whole lot of resources are put into ... nothing!
This something is nanotechnology. Graphene and other injected nanotech are TOXIC. This is science. The rest is unscientific rant and blind faith
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/graphene-slips-deeper-into-lungs-than-predicted/3001864.article
Researchers discover that once graphene enters the lungs the immune system has trouble getting rid of it. Graphene nanoplatelets can penetrate deeper into the lungs than their size would suggest, say UK researchers. And once there, the body’s natural defences cannot deal with them effectively. Chronic exposure could therefore lead to inflammation and disease in a similar way to asbestos fibres.
Why would you put it in EVERY MASK?
a German study found clear evidence that if discrete nanometer diameter particles were deposited in the nasal region (in rodents in this case), they completely circumvented the blood/brain barrier, and travelled up the olfactory nerves straight into the brain
Why would you stick it a graphene PCR test into the brain and why would you inhale it for 3 years from your graphene-bio-mass masks?
• inhaled carbon nanotubes can suppress the immune system by affecting the function of T cells, a type of white blood cell that organises the immune system to fight infections.
And this is COVID and all other now common respiratory problems
For example, studies have established that the comparatively large surface area of inhaled nanoparticles can increase their toxicity. Such small particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and may move to other parts of the body, including the liver and brain.
A major study published in Nature Nanotechnology in May 2008 suggested some forms of carbon nanotubes could be as harmful as asbestos if inhaled in sufficient quantities.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32539642/ Applications of nanomaterials cause a general concern on their toxicity when they intentionally (such as in medicine) or unintentionally (environment exposure) enter into the human body. As a special subpopulation, pregnant women are more susceptible to nanoparticle (NP)-induced toxicity. More importantly, prenatal exposures may affect the entire life of the fetus. Through blood circulation, NPs may cross placental barriers and enter into fetus. A cascade of events, such as damage in placental barriers, generation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered gene expression, may induce delayed or abnormal fetal development. The physicochemical properties of NPs, exposure time, and other factors directly affect nanotoxicity in pregnant populations. Even though results from animal studies cannot directly extrapolate to humans, compelling evidence has already shown that, for pregnant women, caution must be taken when dealing with nanomedicines or NP pollutants.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2017.00606/full In the last two decades, nanotechnologies demonstrated various applications in different fields, including detection, sensing, catalysis, electronics, and biomedical sciences. However, public concerns regarding the well-being of human may hinder the wide utilization of this promising innovation. Although, humans are exposed to airborne nanosized particles from an early age, exposure to such particles has risen dramatically within the last century due to anthropogenic sources of nanoparticles. The wide application of nanomaterials in industry, consumer products, and medicine has raised concerns regarding the potential toxicity of nanoparticles in humans. In this review, the effects of nanomaterials on the reproductive system in animal models are discussed. Females are particularly more vulnerable to nanoparticle toxicity, and toxicity in this population may affect reproductivity and fetal development. Moreover, various types of nanoparticles have negative impacts on male germ cells, fetal development, and the female reproductive system. These impacts are associated with nanoparticle modification, composition, concentration, route of administration, and the species of the animal. Therefore, understanding the impacts of nanoparticles on animal growth and reproduction is essential. Many studies have examined the effects of nanoparticles on primary and secondary target organs, with a concentration on the in vivo and in vitro effects of nanoparticles on the male and female reproductive systems at the clinical, cellular, and molecular levels.
https://www.karger.com/Article/Fulltext/362163 Toxicity of NP: Potential Mechanisms behind Their Cellular Effects during Embryonic Development
Because of their small size, NP can penetrate into the circulatory system and directly propagate into cells thus causing different interactions with cellular organelles. While the toxicity of NP and their effect on embryonic mortality and developmental defects have recently been in focus, the exact toxic mechanism is still unclear, and only a few studies have centered their attention on the cellular response in embryos [Sawosz et al., 2009; Shimizu et al., 2009; Xia et al., 2011; Park et al., 2013].
The toxicity of NP can be explained by their different biological activities, including oxidative stress that damages lipids, carbohydrates, proteins and DNA. Moreover, their penetration into mitochondria, activation of the immune response and changes in receptor or ion channel functions after NP incorporation must be considered. Also, interactions of NP with enzymes, potential apoptotic or necrotic factors and also induction of inflammatory processes must be taken into account [Kohen and Nyska, 2002; Yeo and Kang, 2009; Park et al., 2011, 2013; Zhao et al., 2013]. Furthermore, NP show virus-like properties, which can cause DNA damage and delays in cell proliferation [Asharani et al., 2008a]. Furthermore, they can reduce mitochondrial function [Chen and Schluesener, 2008] and generate cellular morphological abnormalities [Hussain et al., 2005]. The mechanism of NP toxicity can also vary among different types of NP, depending on their chemical composition [Buzea et al., 2007].
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269719014_Effects_of_graphene_oxide_on_the_development_of_offspring_mice_in_lactation_period In this work, we studied the potential developmental toxicity of GO when they entered the body of maternal mice and their offspring by oral exposure with two doses. The results showed that the increase of body weight, body length and tail length of the filial mice received GO at 0.5 mg mL(-1) (about 0.8 mg each mouse) every day in the lactation period was significantly retarded comparing with the control group. The anatomy and histology results revealed the delayed developments of offspring in high dosage group. We also evaluated the possible toxicological mechanism caused by GO and found that the length of the intestinal villus of the filial mice received high concentration GO were decreased significantly compared with the control group. It can be concluded that GO showed many negative effects on the development of mice in the lactation period. These findings can be significant for the development of graphene materials-based drug delivery system and other biomedical applications in the future. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0748233720918689 Applications of nanomaterials cause a general concern on their toxicity when they intentionally (such as in medicine) or unintentionally (environment exposure) enter into the human body. As a special subpopulation, pregnant women are more susceptible to nanoparticle (NP)-induced toxicity. More importantly, prenatal exposures may affect the entire life of the fetus. Through blood circulation, NPs may cross placental barriers and enter into fetus. A cascade of events, such as damage in placental barriers, generation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered gene expression, may induce delayed or abnormal fetal development. The physicochemical properties of NPs, exposure time, and other factors directly affect nanotoxicity in pregnant populations. Even though results from animal studies cannot directly extrapolate to humans, compelling evidence has already shown that, for pregnant women, caution must be taken when dealing with nanomedicines or NP pollutants.
Etc.
So, graphene is USED in MASK - just google masks graphene - images - ALL MASKS CONTAIN GRAPHENE
In PCR tests - no wonder they insert these swabs close to brain not lungs - as there is a direct translocation of nanotech
And of course, it is in these injections
Yes this is true. No PCR test for me.
The PCR contains graphene and ethylene oxide. The boiling point of ethylene oxide is 13.5 °C (56.3 °F), so I guess that to burn holes
These perpetrators must answer for this, no matter how many of them are involved in this crime
Well you know in this global ghetto perpetrators must answer to other perpetrators and that's why we have the human condition. Who can bell the cat? People United. Do they unite now? No. If not now, then maybe when they are walking zombies? Pentagon trained for the Zombie Apocalypse. Perhaps some Colonel goes berserker and shoots other officers but stage a coup and bring us Justice I doubt. And nothing less really than a wholesale change of mind by millions could.
I never paid any heed to this talk of zombies, thought it was just a politically correct way of having an enemy for childish stories.
Yes I as well. Then came vaccination and sick people and dots connected.
I wrote more about amyloid plaque and streetlights (and a bit about the technology) here:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/master-slave-streetlights
And Zombie/next pandemic here:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/buckybombs-is-the-next-pandemic-of
https://outraged.substack.com/p/spooky-amusement-park
https://outraged.substack.com/p/trust-the-science-zombie-virus-is
https://outraged.substack.com/p/a-dream-of-perfection-and-control
It's just TECHNOLOGY
Was there ever any truth in the early iterations of the injections "reducing severity" of the Covid?
If not then there really has been a lot of duping by a whole lot of controlled opposition.
I am thinking that the "social distancing" and prison lockdowns are what gave the impression of the injections working, because we didn't see sick people.
I wonder if you, justifiably outraged one, have a version of your above comment on your website.
That's another problem, every individual whom we come across, who needs a wake-up call, seems to need one especially tailored to them.
As does the rabbi in Stegiel's story.
We also know that, spend hours on it, and they will just think one is a trouble maker and they won't read it.
"Conspiracy theorist" has now become an MSM descriptor of suburban running amok shooters.
No evidence of efficacy. After all it is only the flu. Social Distance and isolation failed as well as did masking. None of this is medically sound and masks make you inhale what you exhale so if you are sick you get sicker. Of course everyone virtue signals with masks thinking they offer protection. And since what is injected makes immune systems crash this clearly is not intelligent. Alas the average intelligence of the best and brightest is not very high generally speaking outside area of expertise and among the medical profession perhaps worse. Last year I was mugged and went to doc to check out my elbow that hurt. He was masked, and worse wore a plastic shield over the mask. He was shocked I refused vaccination and I was shocked he needed a plastic face shield and mask and was concerned my mask was not worn correctly.
You were mugged!?
Three blocks from home in front of the local drug store on a sunny Saturday afternoon in what once was a vibrant neighborhood of hotels and restaurants. I had two shopping bags and a backpack. I put them down briefly just after clearing doorway to adjust weight as Judith and I walked home. Some old crazed black guy who had exited before me decided that I was stealing his bags and tried to take them. He knocked me on my back half in street and choked and punched me as bystanders watched and Judith finally got security guard to get him off me. I was shaken but lucky since I easily could be dead or lost an eye. SF is soft on crime so he got one year probation and a restraining order. :).
Is your elbow getting better?
Do you still have to see this maniac in the street?
No one helping is shocking, as some young man stepping in would have got that sorted.
When you're going to San Fran Cisco, be sure to wear some flowers in your hair.
Other question is what Covid is.
1. ordinary flu - why destroy your immune system to use a huge army when you encounter a small enemy? What then?
2. nanotechnology (in masks, tests, injections, etc.) toxins poisoning - in this case, take antioxidants, not destroy the immune system
A good interview with Dr. Lee, if you have time to listen, because it's quite long, explains it:
https://rumble.com/v1zvw9n-dr-joseph-lee-sounds-alarm-on-the-many-fallacies-of-the-vaccine-program-ful.html
If you insert a toxin, of course your immune system fights it off, so for a while there are more antibodies, but Spike Protein is a fairy tale in terms of giving you immunity. You're basically upsetting the response of your immune system, but it doesn't actually protect you, you can just get the effect of temporarily increased immunity, because the immune system fights back, sending out its armies against the toxin.
That is, it actually leads to loss of immunity, destroys the immune system
That's it as I understand it.
That's why there is vaccine enhanced disease afterwards:
Please notice ADE IS ALSO listed here:
https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download page 16:
“FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines: DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes ***Subject to change***
-Guillain-Barré syndrome
-Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
-Transverse myelitis
-Encephalitis /myelitis/encephalomyelitis/meningoencephalitis/meningitis/encephalopathy
-Convulsions/seizures
-Stroke
-Narcolepsy and cataplexy
-Anaphylaxis
-Acute myocardial infarction
-Myocarditis/pericarditis
-Autoimmune disease
-Deaths
-Preganacy and birth outcomes
-Other acute demyelinating diseases
-Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
-Thrombocytopenia
-Disseminated intervascular coagulation
-Venous thromboembolism
-Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
-Kawasaki disease
-Multisymptom Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
-Vaccine enhanced disease
Many have reported Covid as an adverse effect, after injection:
COVID-19 190,303 - 13.02%
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=SYM&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19
I have not yet watched the video, but I have mentioned it just now on Mark Crispin Miller's Substack Rage Against the Machine post.
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/rage-against-the-machines-tim-commerford/comments?utm_source=substack%2Csubstack&publication_id=383085&post_id=91090809&utm_medium=email%2Cemail&isFreemail=false&comments=true
I can understand how upsetting this would have been for your wife.
It's looking like she is being shunned.
Maybe a different rabbi at a different synagogue, but religion is an habitual exercise, and habits don't take easily to change.
Religion being obviously faith based, implies that the adherents are trusting types, and therefore the lower level religious soldiers will trust the messages from their superiors.
Not likely that this rabbi will want to rock any arks nor want those who receive his received wisdom to do any rocking either.
I realise that your wife is of advanced years, but also very intelligent; can she move herself to a new sort of freedom, from awareness of the flawed hierarchy she has been subjected to.
(I'm not trying to be a know-all, just trying to put myself in different shoes.)
We went to a different Congregation this evening that is the brother of the the other as both founded at same time by the same community but split in 19th century over something or other and to be honest I forgot. The one tonight is more or less distinctly less affluent and warmer. They once required masking and vaccines but do not now though the bulk of the fifty people tonight masked to my great amusement. She was happy to have a live service. We recognized people including one former co-worker of ours from SF Opera. Due to Covid raging in Bay Area attendance across the board is less than 3 years ago everywhere and Zoom rules. They had a Hanukkah party which disappointed me. I expected food for $20 per head not salad and latkes. They did have live music which was good. The wine terrible even though it was California wine. Despite my diabetes to assuage my hunger I had a good old Anchor Stem beer. And yes adherents are trusting types. Quite like normal consumers who rely on a trusted celeb to endorse something. Which is something I never have been able to grasp. I cannot think why if Jane Doe likes a brand of ice cream or shoes or anything else I ought to as well.
Maybe your new congregation will have fewer experts.
Do people get more emotionally frail with age, or is it bewilderment.
Depends. I think more frail and bewildered arises from the post modern life. If the person were rural on farm or ranch likely less so. Even urban differs though. I knew an artist in his 70's working construction and he was a smoker.
One can tell a lot by how someone walks.
I never wrote any popstars' names on my pencil case, nor ever had any posters on my wall.
So, I was early on fortifying myself against the in crowd. As a teenager I thought maybe I was just lazy.
Idolizing never was my strong suit. As a child I did have a lunch box with astronauts I thought was cool. Aside from that indifferent to fame, celebrity, heroism.
The astronaut lunchbox does indeed sound cool. Generic astronauts or the moon buggy ones?
Generic, though I recall one of them had 3 contemporary figures. Circa 1966. Good story character is a collector of lunch boxes. A fun art film.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/294829082166
I just looked at some online.
Sorry, for not keeping up.
Saw what yesterday?
Mercola piece.