One must not forget that the two parts of the Uniparty have been playing good-cop/bad-cop forever, and it only depends on the voter's preference who is considered good or bad, while both ignore the people's best interests and even their basic (and mostly imaginary) "human" rights.
Understanding the existence and role of the Uniparty is critical. The added danger of seeing and knowing this phenomenon is that it can lead to total cynicism and resigned inaction. There are brave warriors who step into the political arena to oppose the blob and its 'elected' representatives. Knowing who they are is a challenge of discenment.
Excellent point. What about DEI fundamentalists in a public emergency deciding only special category citizens are helped. Co-Religionists as it were. Ought the public pay for this instead? FEMA-taxpayer funded-insisists yes. Only select categories are helped.
Great details!
One must not forget that the two parts of the Uniparty have been playing good-cop/bad-cop forever, and it only depends on the voter's preference who is considered good or bad, while both ignore the people's best interests and even their basic (and mostly imaginary) "human" rights.
Understanding the existence and role of the Uniparty is critical. The added danger of seeing and knowing this phenomenon is that it can lead to total cynicism and resigned inaction. There are brave warriors who step into the political arena to oppose the blob and its 'elected' representatives. Knowing who they are is a challenge of discenment.
It may be a “uniparty” but one wing comes with religious nationalism: fascism.
Excellent point. What about DEI fundamentalists in a public emergency deciding only special category citizens are helped. Co-Religionists as it were. Ought the public pay for this instead? FEMA-taxpayer funded-insisists yes. Only select categories are helped.