The controversy cannot die or will not since Churchill is the emblem of the British Empire just before the moonless and starless night of communism as noon day sun behind an Iron Curtain.
Yes true. The narrow question for White Sainthood is did he by malice aforethought starve Bengal or not? If not, was the crisis responsibly attributed to Indian policy he did nothing about?
Yes but Levi was then. We know better. Never got down from the cross. No one removed the body to a tomb. Thus time stopped at Cavalry as Hell continues to be harrowed. Navyo Ericsen have you read the book by Levi, Fear of Freedom? https://autonomies.org/2022/01/carlo-levi-a-witness-to-freedom/
Love to hear your thoughts on this interview...
https://tube2.solari.com/videos/reset-in-ukraine-with-karel-van-wolferen-1080p-hls/
So obviously deliberate. Once you know, you know. Move over, Stalin!!
Churchill as well used food as a weapon.
I'd have to look that up. But yes. Churchill did not abide by his PR machine.
The controversy cannot die or will not since Churchill is the emblem of the British Empire just before the moonless and starless night of communism as noon day sun behind an Iron Curtain.
Churchill was completely in thrall to his backers. An inept capitalist himself, with debts.
Yes true. The narrow question for White Sainthood is did he by malice aforethought starve Bengal or not? If not, was the crisis responsibly attributed to Indian policy he did nothing about?
Winston Churchill, MA.
Yes but Levi was then. We know better. Never got down from the cross. No one removed the body to a tomb. Thus time stopped at Cavalry as Hell continues to be harrowed. Navyo Ericsen have you read the book by Levi, Fear of Freedom? https://autonomies.org/2022/01/carlo-levi-a-witness-to-freedom/