11 Comments
User's avatar
Navyo Ericsen's avatar

Love to hear your thoughts on this interview...

https://tube2.solari.com/videos/reset-in-ukraine-with-karel-van-wolferen-1080p-hls/

Expand full comment
Navyo Ericsen's avatar

So obviously deliberate. Once you know, you know. Move over, Stalin!!

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

Churchill as well used food as a weapon.

Expand full comment
Navyo Ericsen's avatar

I'd have to look that up. But yes. Churchill did not abide by his PR machine.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

The controversy cannot die or will not since Churchill is the emblem of the British Empire just before the moonless and starless night of communism as noon day sun behind an Iron Curtain.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Churchill was completely in thrall to his backers. An inept capitalist himself, with debts.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

Yes true. The narrow question for White Sainthood is did he by malice aforethought starve Bengal or not? If not, was the crisis responsibly attributed to Indian policy he did nothing about?

Expand full comment
Navyo Ericsen's avatar

Winston Churchill, MA.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

Yes but Levi was then. We know better. Never got down from the cross. No one removed the body to a tomb. Thus time stopped at Cavalry as Hell continues to be harrowed. Navyo Ericsen have you read the book by Levi, Fear of Freedom? https://autonomies.org/2022/01/carlo-levi-a-witness-to-freedom/

Expand full comment