https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/12/15/latest-vaers-estimate-388000-americans-killed-by-the-covid-vaccines/
This is the back story in part:
The PCR test. They obtain a specimen via swab. Then they extract RNA(ribonucleic acid) from that and convert to DNA.
Next this gets AMPLIFIED by PCR with specific primers.
Then they take the results and interpret them based on the presence of viral RNA.
Sounds legit right? Well heres the problem that you can see in their studies and charts regarding how much they're amplifying it. The level of amplification is measured in cycles.
From their own studies and reports, the test is correct at up to 17 cycles. At an amplification of 27 cycles, the rate at which the test is correct drops to 65%. Once they do 33 cycles, now the test is only correct 20% of the time..
At 34 cycles, there is a 0% CHANCE THAT THE RESULT IS CORRECT.
With this information they did another study which took how much its being amplified and what day after you started showing symptoms you took the test. Up to 30 cycles, only being tested on the 3rd day you began showing symptoms, the test is correct 80%t of the time.
At 27 cycles on day 4, the test is correct 60% of the time.
At 17 cycles on day 5, the test is correct 33% of the time.
After day 6, there is a 0% chance the test is correct.
So why is this important? Why am I discussing this?
Even after the CDC did these studies and knows how much they amplify it(cycles) affects the results, and even though they know that when you get tested also affects the results.......they havent changed the tests.
Most PCR tests are being conducted at 40 cycles, some at 37. Im sure most of you can understand what this means.
Dr. Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.”
“First, in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”
In other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a spaceship.
Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”
“The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”
The sequencing anecdote reminds me of the story of Pithecanthropus Erectus ("Jave Ape-Man"), and we have all learned how accurate that turned out to be.
Fraud is not fraud even when it is. In this case the objective is a fake virus to frighten the world into obedience. Remarkably when big names opposed to Vaccines are challenged on virus isolation they double down on the fake virus. Kirsch, Malone, Berenson, to name but three. This bridges to the entire "science" of virology. Covid judo technique may be bringing an entire area of pseudo-science down. If not, dealing it a heavy blow. The possibility also is present of bringing down the actually existing Super Capitalist order. I am a reader so I enjoy thinking of a certain monarch of Lydia in this Covid context. Now of course scholars assure us this is fable but fiction and fact mirror one another to create true myth. Croesus' uneasy relations with the Ionians obscures the larger fact that he was the last bastion of the Ionian cities against the increasing Persian power in Anatolia. He began preparing a campaign against Cyrus the Great of Persia.
Before setting out, he turned to the Delphic oracle and the oracle of Amphiaraus to inquire whether he should pursue this campaign and whether he should also seek an alliance. The oracles answered, with typical ambiguity, that if Croesus attacked the Persians, he would destroy a great empire (ἢν στρατεύηται ἐπὶ Πέρσας, μεγάλην ἀρχὴν μιν καταλύσειν[28]) – this would become one of the most famous oracular statements from Delphi.
The oracles also advised Croesus to find out which Greek state was most powerful and to ally himself with it.[29] Croesus, now feeling secure, formed an alliance with Sparta[30] in addition to those he had with Amasis II of Egypt and Nabonidus of Babylonia,[31] and launched his campaign against the Persian Empire in 547 BC. (The scholar Evans in 1978 examines the conflicting dates implied in Herodotus.[6]) Croesus was intercepted near the Halys River in central Anatolia and an inconclusive battle was fought at Pteria. It was the usual practice in those days for the armies to disband for winter and Croesus did so accordingly. Cyrus did not, however, and he attacked and defeated Croesus in Thymbria and later in Sardis, eventually capturing him. It became clear that the powerful empire destroyed by the war was Croesus's own.