Not speaking any language but English I rely on other observers. What I have found roughly corresponds to stock touting. China's global rise is tied to overall commercial development of the planet by Technics. In general each observer is tied to a viewpoint or maybe better each person has a sailing on the Yangtze in the boat most appropriate for their core audience. Then taking in mind local conditions are not favorable for full development of the human being and that the CCP is a gang of bandits linked with Triads and Globalist interests, winnowing the wheat from the chaff is not so hard. Pepe Escobar roots for China, Michael Hudson too, so one reads and reads others to have a quick and useful portrait of the desired future. I worked in 2000 sending Alumni to China on tours. I worked with a graduate of Beijing University who was at Tianamen Square as an outside observer from campus and a Poly Sci. graduate. Our views were quite different.
Nah. He won't do Davos. He thinks this trade alliance is a moral thang. As if Russia and China are winning the game of nations and advancing pawns to Queen and creating a moral future. As if the West is not helplessly communist. Globalism is communism. In fact Melville grasped it and I am consistently amazed pundits do not. "It is a wicked world in all meridians."
You are several decades out of date! Neither China nor Russia are communist now. The West is not communist either.
This is Hegelian Dialectic stuff. We have a unipolar world under the Anglo/American Empire, that is the thesis. The multipolar world is the antithesis but the OBJECTIVE is totalitarianism which will make communism look tame.
Moreover I deny the myth of a Multi-Polar world. Agreements among brigands remain. The head Brigand can be set aside and rivals squabble until one faction can be in control. No nation state cares about qua man but all will propagandize that they do.
Saker article is interesting. Here in the USA its best to get a jump on becoming a peasant as it takes a decade to develop local resources. You know, we have to eat. Start now and avoid the rush.
Well the last I saw is the usual language from WEF. Partners. I have a few bits of information in regards to updated mind control work with cadre I will post later. I am fascinated by Convergence of USA with the Great Dragon. https://mathewaldred.substack.com/p/ex-director-of-darpa-regina-dugan?utm_medium=reader2
I seldom believe western gossip about China.
Not speaking any language but English I rely on other observers. What I have found roughly corresponds to stock touting. China's global rise is tied to overall commercial development of the planet by Technics. In general each observer is tied to a viewpoint or maybe better each person has a sailing on the Yangtze in the boat most appropriate for their core audience. Then taking in mind local conditions are not favorable for full development of the human being and that the CCP is a gang of bandits linked with Triads and Globalist interests, winnowing the wheat from the chaff is not so hard. Pepe Escobar roots for China, Michael Hudson too, so one reads and reads others to have a quick and useful portrait of the desired future. I worked in 2000 sending Alumni to China on tours. I worked with a graduate of Beijing University who was at Tianamen Square as an outside observer from campus and a Poly Sci. graduate. Our views were quite different.
I found Pepe Escobar's recent article on Saker very clear and fair.
http://thesaker.is/for-those-about-to-rock-nam-2-0-salutes-you/
Nah. He won't do Davos. He thinks this trade alliance is a moral thang. As if Russia and China are winning the game of nations and advancing pawns to Queen and creating a moral future. As if the West is not helplessly communist. Globalism is communism. In fact Melville grasped it and I am consistently amazed pundits do not. "It is a wicked world in all meridians."
You are several decades out of date! Neither China nor Russia are communist now. The West is not communist either.
This is Hegelian Dialectic stuff. We have a unipolar world under the Anglo/American Empire, that is the thesis. The multipolar world is the antithesis but the OBJECTIVE is totalitarianism which will make communism look tame.
Moreover I deny the myth of a Multi-Polar world. Agreements among brigands remain. The head Brigand can be set aside and rivals squabble until one faction can be in control. No nation state cares about qua man but all will propagandize that they do.
Communism by any other name is a Gnostic heresy and Titanic ideology. I use the term to point to the content and am indifferent as brand name.
WTF? Twas YOU who started using the isms..... ffs.
Saker article is interesting. Here in the USA its best to get a jump on becoming a peasant as it takes a decade to develop local resources. You know, we have to eat. Start now and avoid the rush.
Informative thanks. How’s China doing as the darling of the WORLD Economic Forum these days?