6 Comments
Oct 6, 2022·edited Oct 6, 2022Liked by Stegiel

"Yet another reason for lowered trust in our health care system."

You think?

Everyone should read Bailiwick News, Katherine Watt,

"State-level Mini-Me government-run bioterrorism programs."

"Public health is moving under Department of Defense."

"The NDAA of 2021 and 2022 explicitly say Use of Force is authorized; this is medical military martial law."

" there are Mini-Me versions of the federal bioterrorism and population control grid — including state laws to suspend constitutional rights and conflicting laws — in each American state."

"And there is now an aggressive, renewed push by the Predator-Parasites — under the Covid pretext — to get more provisions into place at the state level in all 50 states."

Katherine says that this essentially began in 2003.

Medical Martial Law folks!

Does anyone remember HillaryCare? "Health Security Act of 1993"

I'd be willing to bet it wasn't the kind of "security" we thought.

Expand full comment
author

USSR of blessed memory used Article 51 of the Soviet penal code to punish dissent with psychiatric hospitals. The diagnosis of Sluggish Schizophrenia arose in the tension between knowing dissent was punishable by imprisonment but the dissenter did dissent against the ideal USSR.

Expand full comment
Oct 7, 2022·edited Oct 7, 2022

Back in around 2006, there was a mysteriously well-funded and well-timed push to have a new psychological illness added to the DSM definition manual. It was to be for people who were picky about the purity or safety of things entering their bodies or impacting their health -- for instance, those who wanted to eat organic food.

This was timed with the barrage of lawsuits led by Mons. against companies that labeled their products 'non-GMO', and the era where GMO was being used for animal feed but mysteriously disappearing before it reached human lips -- however they wanted to have it universally on the grocery store shelf, unlabeled.

Clearly, anybody who didn't think this was a good idea deserved to be labeled insane and dealt with accordingly.

They're recycling the same strategy now.

Difference being, a 'mentally unfit' label in a medical context is, depending on which country you're in, enough to allow forced medical treatment deemed 'good' by those 'mentally fit' treating physicians and nurses -- example, administering medication against the momentary will of someone having an acute psychotic episode. In Australia a few months ago, for instance, they explicitly described the strategy of vaccinating patients 'to help them' when they are not in the capacity to make that decision themselves -- including under anesthesia.

Expand full comment