Time to take sides on this, because Jessica and Karen can't both be right.
Jessica doesn't even talk about the possibility of GO. Jessica is impressive in her scare story that an average person can't make head nor tail of - one would need a lot of "expensive education" to keep up. I did try to understand all this reverse triptease stuff a year or so back. Karen I do understand, and it's scary, but at least if we know what we are dealing with there's a chance of a cure.
Really weird isn't it?
Now the question is, am I refusing to believe the truth just because I don't understand it or is Jessica conning herself and anyone else.
As you point out most pointedly the vile vials have been found to contain GO, not mRNA.
I'll give Jessica the benefit of the doubt and say maybe some vials that have not been tested are chocca full of these genetic modifiers. And Jessica and her friends can't look in the vials because they are not allowed to.
Edit: I just now read Jessica's Substack. Her friends were analysing the actual content of the Bivalent vials. I think. Now what or who?
I am open to the overall possibility that for reasons we discussed a certain opacity presents which is double think. I follow the unfolding over time. Few have paranoid critical views of truth from authority and even fewer fail to comply with demands by authority. Work on vials searches for confirmation of a hunch if not by corporations. Access to vials even now quite hard. Access and ability to do the tech rarer still. So hostage to narrative. Narrative based on cognitive bias.
"Because I think that's BS. I sat in on one the best presentations I have ever heard the other day given by really nerdy people who recreated the fifth column work. They showed very explicitly why the conclusions drawn concerning GO and nano-structures from that work are false. :) It will be made public soon."
This is what Jessica has replied to a comment asking about the GO.
GO figure.
I must read some more Jessica, things are hotting up.
Interesting. I believe she also posted on how it did not matter if a virus is in violation of realty because we work by metaphor in the end as ball park assumptions. Her example was imaging of a molecule. Evidently until recently no,image existed. Naturally we can build a network analysis of her connections, posts, persons obligated to. What fascinates me is the hostility to GO and loyalty to virus theory. Things are hotting up as the Big Con starts a crumble. Some folks like past CDC head left the building and spoke up later when asked by Congress about Covid years too late.
He said that what's in the shots isn't important. It is actually because they are still coming up with new shot "variants" to foist on everyone and changing the children's shooting schedule.
Time to take sides on this, because Jessica and Karen can't both be right.
Jessica doesn't even talk about the possibility of GO. Jessica is impressive in her scare story that an average person can't make head nor tail of - one would need a lot of "expensive education" to keep up. I did try to understand all this reverse triptease stuff a year or so back. Karen I do understand, and it's scary, but at least if we know what we are dealing with there's a chance of a cure.
Really weird isn't it?
Now the question is, am I refusing to believe the truth just because I don't understand it or is Jessica conning herself and anyone else.
As you point out most pointedly the vile vials have been found to contain GO, not mRNA.
I'll give Jessica the benefit of the doubt and say maybe some vials that have not been tested are chocca full of these genetic modifiers. And Jessica and her friends can't look in the vials because they are not allowed to.
Edit: I just now read Jessica's Substack. Her friends were analysing the actual content of the Bivalent vials. I think. Now what or who?
I am open to the overall possibility that for reasons we discussed a certain opacity presents which is double think. I follow the unfolding over time. Few have paranoid critical views of truth from authority and even fewer fail to comply with demands by authority. Work on vials searches for confirmation of a hunch if not by corporations. Access to vials even now quite hard. Access and ability to do the tech rarer still. So hostage to narrative. Narrative based on cognitive bias.
https://open.substack.com/pub/peterhalligan/p/is-the-graphene-oxide-in-the-c19?r=4mopi&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
"Because I think that's BS. I sat in on one the best presentations I have ever heard the other day given by really nerdy people who recreated the fifth column work. They showed very explicitly why the conclusions drawn concerning GO and nano-structures from that work are false. :) It will be made public soon."
This is what Jessica has replied to a comment asking about the GO.
GO figure.
I must read some more Jessica, things are hotting up.
Interesting. I believe she also posted on how it did not matter if a virus is in violation of realty because we work by metaphor in the end as ball park assumptions. Her example was imaging of a molecule. Evidently until recently no,image existed. Naturally we can build a network analysis of her connections, posts, persons obligated to. What fascinates me is the hostility to GO and loyalty to virus theory. Things are hotting up as the Big Con starts a crumble. Some folks like past CDC head left the building and spoke up later when asked by Congress about Covid years too late.
https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/mik-andersens-39-articles-in-english?utm_medium=ios
Bufus included this link in his comment on Jessica's Substack.
In his comments he has put a lot of links.
He has been studying the GO in the shots.
Ray made a comment but didn't call her out.
He said that what's in the shots isn't important. It is actually because they are still coming up with new shot "variants" to foist on everyone and changing the children's shooting schedule.