I spotted that you were shocked at the post by Rich. What he did not show in his post was the many previous days of stalking, harassing and character assassination he had peppered me with. He also did the same to two other female writers on Substack.
Oh? Are you saying that you did not set up a post to trap me? Then claim that Frances Leader is a fake name. Then accuse me of being 'establishment'. Then say that my name is 666 in some b/s gematria? Then decide that I lied when I said that Dippy Dappy Duck on Twitter is a close friend? Then decide that I must be DD Duck? Then cast nasty aspersions on my fragile friend Elizabeth who you attacked FOR NO REASON? Then goad me into trying humour which (as you lack a sense of humour) you are now sharing about to DISCREDIT me?
Claiming I am a male person?
Claiming I do not live in Dorset?
Calling me a moron and a pig? (as evidenced in your own screenshots)
ALL OF THIS WITHOUT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE.
You are a vicious troll, Rich - and what is more...... YOU KNOW IT because you do it deliberately.
Substack have responded to my complaint. They have banned you from my account.
Ho hum Frances. All your gals, including yourself, are bad gals. Being called a c&^t 30 times by SageHana is kind of masculine. Being told by you that I'm masturbating to the idea of you (you supposedly being a 73 yo grandmother) is also kind of masculine. And what you're not mentioning here is that you're all 'friends' of Elizabeth who is actively trying to have Substack remove my account. As you are.
And the abuse is all yours. As soon as I critiqued the rather crazy Max Igan you started on me. And then you heaped further abuse on me in regards to what I said about 5g as you do on others who may be critical on 5g but not insane about it. It all has the smell of being somewhat manufactured. Or just pure crazy. But I favour the former.
I am not going to reply to you anymore Frances. You also remind me of Frank who hopped between being pleasant and trying to cause problems. In fact you even share the same name, more or less.
Here's the comment of yours that I was referring to above.
I spotted that you were shocked at the post by Rich. What he did not show in his post was the many previous days of stalking, harassing and character assassination he had peppered me with. He also did the same to two other female writers on Substack.
He is a bad guy.
Please, try not to goad site owners against commenters. It's not fair, especially with generalities.
I usually don't ban anyone and let commenters work out their differences themselves.
What's the point, anyway?
Libelous generalities. Just keep repeating the lie(s) seems to be strategy.
Oh? Are you saying that you did not set up a post to trap me? Then claim that Frances Leader is a fake name. Then accuse me of being 'establishment'. Then say that my name is 666 in some b/s gematria? Then decide that I lied when I said that Dippy Dappy Duck on Twitter is a close friend? Then decide that I must be DD Duck? Then cast nasty aspersions on my fragile friend Elizabeth who you attacked FOR NO REASON? Then goad me into trying humour which (as you lack a sense of humour) you are now sharing about to DISCREDIT me?
Claiming I am a male person?
Claiming I do not live in Dorset?
Calling me a moron and a pig? (as evidenced in your own screenshots)
ALL OF THIS WITHOUT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE.
You are a vicious troll, Rich - and what is more...... YOU KNOW IT because you do it deliberately.
Substack have responded to my complaint. They have banned you from my account.
Now you deny me the right to self defence?
Nobody is denying you anything. Please, re-read my note.
Do not patronise me. I can read perfectly well, thank you.
I saw your comment on Rich's offensive post and was prevented from responding to you there because Rich had banned me for 24 hours.
You have been lied to.
I tried to let you know.
Now I don't trust you either.
What makes you think I am patronizing you?
Who lied to me and how?
I do not engage in arguments between commenters, but it would be nice to keep the place civilized. By that, I mean, polite and specific.
Thank you for your understanding.
Ho hum Frances. All your gals, including yourself, are bad gals. Being called a c&^t 30 times by SageHana is kind of masculine. Being told by you that I'm masturbating to the idea of you (you supposedly being a 73 yo grandmother) is also kind of masculine. And what you're not mentioning here is that you're all 'friends' of Elizabeth who is actively trying to have Substack remove my account. As you are.
And the abuse is all yours. As soon as I critiqued the rather crazy Max Igan you started on me. And then you heaped further abuse on me in regards to what I said about 5g as you do on others who may be critical on 5g but not insane about it. It all has the smell of being somewhat manufactured. Or just pure crazy. But I favour the former.
Thank you for specifying precisely how your abuse has developed. I am sure Stegiel will be most unimpressed with you.
I have screen shot it for the ongoing Substack investigation.
I am not going to reply to you anymore Frances. You also remind me of Frank who hopped between being pleasant and trying to cause problems. In fact you even share the same name, more or less.
Here's the comment of yours that I was referring to above.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb864bab8-2609-462b-a59c-e662a602a62a_841x484.png
You have abused me for many days. and are quoting the final few messages which you elicited by needling and accusing and lying about me.
You did the same to Sage Hana and Elizabeth, I SAW YOU DO IT.
Now you have been reported to Substack. DEAL WITH IT.
I'm wondering if you are Sage Hana. Or Rage Nana.
And Elizabeth Rubenstein is a pain in the arse and a liar much like you are. Anyway I should keep to my promise to myself. Not to engage with you.
Aha..... you want to continue to discredit THREE FEMALE WRITERS ON SUBSTACK???
We are right about you.
MISOGYNIST TROLL.