The trouble is, a lot of children used to die from childhood diseases. My own father almost died of diphtheria when he was a baby when the mucus plug this illness causes blocked his windpipe. His father had to hold him up by his feet and beat on his back until the plug came out. Could this have worked with a 10 year old? In the 1920s, over 200,000 people, mostly children, died of diphtheria. Measles is another killer, it turns off the immune system. Roald Dahl's daughter died at age 12 of measles. Whooping cough kills 35% of children under 5 who get it. What's the answer, ditch all vaccines and hope your child doesn't die when they get whooping cough or diphtheria, or maybe work out a way to make vaccines safer?
If vaccines are useless, then why did incidence of these diseases plummet and the number of children dying also dropped. Do you think a good fairy of some kind sprinkled sparkle flakes over them to keep them from getting sick. And no, I and my family wouldn't touch the covid death shot under any circumstances, and I think they're ruining what were adequate vaccines for children now by putting that mRNA poison into them.
• “During the last two decades of the 19th century diphtheria was the leading cause of death of toddlers in the industrialized world, in some cities killing more than a thousand in a single year. In contrast, since 1980 fewer than 100 cases have been reported in the entire United States. Although diphtheria is hardly the only infectious disease to have thus faded, its story is unique because the early period of its decline can be directly linked to advances in bacteriologic knowledge and practice. Between 1880 and 1930 health authorities in New York City were responsible for much of the practical innovation in the control of diphtheria, as well as a good share of scientific progress.”
• “The trend in death rates for specific causes, over the past 20 or 30 years, may be characterized by two general statements. In the first place, there has been a great reduction in the death rates for infectious and preventable diseases; in the second place, there has been an increase in the rates for certain diseases characteristic of older ages. Greatest proportional rate decreases have taken place for such diseases as typhoid and parathyroid fever, which has declined from a rate of 23.5 in 1910 to 2.1 in 1937; and diphtheria, which declined from a rate of 21.4 in 1910 to 2.0 in 1937. ... The rate reductions for infectious and preventable diseases can be largely attributed to the development of modern public-health practice.”
• “... the largest historical decrease in morbidity and mortality caused by infectious disease was experienced not with the modern antibiotic and vaccine era, but after the introduction of clean water and effective sewer systems.”
• “The conquest of infectious disease and the health revolution it initiated is arguably one of the greatest achievements of Western civilization. Yet the phenomenon is largely unknown and rarely taught, even in history courses. Conventional wisdom usually assumes that conquest of infectious
disease can be credited to well-known lifesaving innovations in medicine such as vaccines, antibiotics, and surgical asepsis. These icons are truly essential ingredients of modern medicine, and their contribution to human life and health in this century can never be minimized. However, except for the smallpox vaccination, which was introduced in 1798 and made compulsory in England in 1853, the overall contribution of medical innovations to the health revolution of the 1800s is difficult to validate. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine arrived on the scene only after disease mortality rates already had been reduced significantly; measles, rubella, and polio vaccines did not become available until the middle of the 20th century, when most infant deaths were the result of other causes. The same holds true for sulfa drugs and antibiotics. Their contribution is unequivocal, but they did not affect mortality rates until the 1940s.”
Another paper published in the premier medical journal The Lancet in 1977 by the Department of Community Medicine in the United Kingdom also indicates that vaccines were not responsible for the decline in disease rates in that country.
The author’s conclusion that “there is no evidence that vaccination played a major role in the decline in incidence and mortality” is quite monumental and far different than the general public perception.
Thomas McKeown who was Professor of Social Medicine in the University of Birmingham Medical School between 1950 and 1978, is still regarded as a major social philosopher of medicine, and known for his important works on epidemiology and the practice and purpose of medicine. His conclusion was also that diseases were declining well before medical interventions such as vaccinations came into standard use.
Another author shows that disease and mortality was falling before the advent of vaccines or drug therapies:
• “There was a continuous decline [whooping cough deaths], equal in each sex, from 1937 onward. Vaccination, beginning on small scale in some places around 1948 and on a national scale in 1957, did not affect the rate of decline if it be assumed that one attack usually confers immunity, as in most major communicable diseases of childhood. ... The steady decline of whooping cough between 1930 and 1957 is predictive of a linear exponential decay characteristic of a general and progressive lessening in the volume and spread of infection among the susceptible population. With this pattern well established before 1957, there is no evidence that vaccination played a major role in the decline in incidence and mortality in the trend of events.
Then how do you explain the lower death rate in children after the 'normal vaccines' were introduced? Or do you find a death rate among children of 20% or 30% to be acceptable? After Britain stopped requiring childhood vaccines some years ago, a lot of children did come down with diphtheria and whooping cough. Sure, we have ways to keep more of them alive who get these dreadful illnesses now, but would you like your child to have to spend time in the hospital because their throat closed due to diphtheria? I'm old enough to have gotten measles, mumps, German measles, and chicken pox. The worst was measles since I was sick for weeks and had to lie in a dark room because my eyes hurt so badly. Did you know that if a boy catches mumps at the wrong time, when he's around the age of puberty, he can become sterile? Adults can die if they contract chicken pox.
Absolutely excellent!
Much appreciated 👍
To own the copy, open the book article etc by clicking on it.
On the top left corner of the online readable book/doc you will see a magnify glass (to zoom etc) and 3 periods/full stops just below it.
Select the 3 periods, and within that drop down menu that appears is downloadable formats available.
The trouble is, a lot of children used to die from childhood diseases. My own father almost died of diphtheria when he was a baby when the mucus plug this illness causes blocked his windpipe. His father had to hold him up by his feet and beat on his back until the plug came out. Could this have worked with a 10 year old? In the 1920s, over 200,000 people, mostly children, died of diphtheria. Measles is another killer, it turns off the immune system. Roald Dahl's daughter died at age 12 of measles. Whooping cough kills 35% of children under 5 who get it. What's the answer, ditch all vaccines and hope your child doesn't die when they get whooping cough or diphtheria, or maybe work out a way to make vaccines safer?
Probable that vaccines are useless in the final analysis. From Jenner to today sold like a car. I had measles and lived.
If vaccines are useless, then why did incidence of these diseases plummet and the number of children dying also dropped. Do you think a good fairy of some kind sprinkled sparkle flakes over them to keep them from getting sick. And no, I and my family wouldn't touch the covid death shot under any circumstances, and I think they're ruining what were adequate vaccines for children now by putting that mRNA poison into them.
2001 paper in the Journal of Infection Control:
• “During the last two decades of the 19th century diphtheria was the leading cause of death of toddlers in the industrialized world, in some cities killing more than a thousand in a single year. In contrast, since 1980 fewer than 100 cases have been reported in the entire United States. Although diphtheria is hardly the only infectious disease to have thus faded, its story is unique because the early period of its decline can be directly linked to advances in bacteriologic knowledge and practice. Between 1880 and 1930 health authorities in New York City were responsible for much of the practical innovation in the control of diphtheria, as well as a good share of scientific progress.”
• “The trend in death rates for specific causes, over the past 20 or 30 years, may be characterized by two general statements. In the first place, there has been a great reduction in the death rates for infectious and preventable diseases; in the second place, there has been an increase in the rates for certain diseases characteristic of older ages. Greatest proportional rate decreases have taken place for such diseases as typhoid and parathyroid fever, which has declined from a rate of 23.5 in 1910 to 2.1 in 1937; and diphtheria, which declined from a rate of 21.4 in 1910 to 2.0 in 1937. ... The rate reductions for infectious and preventable diseases can be largely attributed to the development of modern public-health practice.”
• “... the largest historical decrease in morbidity and mortality caused by infectious disease was experienced not with the modern antibiotic and vaccine era, but after the introduction of clean water and effective sewer systems.”
• “The conquest of infectious disease and the health revolution it initiated is arguably one of the greatest achievements of Western civilization. Yet the phenomenon is largely unknown and rarely taught, even in history courses. Conventional wisdom usually assumes that conquest of infectious
disease can be credited to well-known lifesaving innovations in medicine such as vaccines, antibiotics, and surgical asepsis. These icons are truly essential ingredients of modern medicine, and their contribution to human life and health in this century can never be minimized. However, except for the smallpox vaccination, which was introduced in 1798 and made compulsory in England in 1853, the overall contribution of medical innovations to the health revolution of the 1800s is difficult to validate. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine arrived on the scene only after disease mortality rates already had been reduced significantly; measles, rubella, and polio vaccines did not become available until the middle of the 20th century, when most infant deaths were the result of other causes. The same holds true for sulfa drugs and antibiotics. Their contribution is unequivocal, but they did not affect mortality rates until the 1940s.”
Another paper published in the premier medical journal The Lancet in 1977 by the Department of Community Medicine in the United Kingdom also indicates that vaccines were not responsible for the decline in disease rates in that country.
The author’s conclusion that “there is no evidence that vaccination played a major role in the decline in incidence and mortality” is quite monumental and far different than the general public perception.
Thomas McKeown who was Professor of Social Medicine in the University of Birmingham Medical School between 1950 and 1978, is still regarded as a major social philosopher of medicine, and known for his important works on epidemiology and the practice and purpose of medicine. His conclusion was also that diseases were declining well before medical interventions such as vaccinations came into standard use.
Another author shows that disease and mortality was falling before the advent of vaccines or drug therapies:
• “There was a continuous decline [whooping cough deaths], equal in each sex, from 1937 onward. Vaccination, beginning on small scale in some places around 1948 and on a national scale in 1957, did not affect the rate of decline if it be assumed that one attack usually confers immunity, as in most major communicable diseases of childhood. ... The steady decline of whooping cough between 1930 and 1957 is predictive of a linear exponential decay characteristic of a general and progressive lessening in the volume and spread of infection among the susceptible population. With this pattern well established before 1957, there is no evidence that vaccination played a major role in the decline in incidence and mortality in the trend of events.
I believe the efficacy of vaccines may be propaganda. https://www.dolmetsch.com/the-real-truth-vaccine-inefficacy.pdf
Then how do you explain the lower death rate in children after the 'normal vaccines' were introduced? Or do you find a death rate among children of 20% or 30% to be acceptable? After Britain stopped requiring childhood vaccines some years ago, a lot of children did come down with diphtheria and whooping cough. Sure, we have ways to keep more of them alive who get these dreadful illnesses now, but would you like your child to have to spend time in the hospital because their throat closed due to diphtheria? I'm old enough to have gotten measles, mumps, German measles, and chicken pox. The worst was measles since I was sick for weeks and had to lie in a dark room because my eyes hurt so badly. Did you know that if a boy catches mumps at the wrong time, when he's around the age of puberty, he can become sterile? Adults can die if they contract chicken pox.
Thanks!