As military targets of DoD biochemical weapons

Umm, dat would be me if I injected, inhaled, drank it up, snorted it

As military targets of DoD biochemical weapons, plaintiffs do not fall under informed consent laws and clinical trial subject participant protections. Those laws are inapplicable in military/war contexts.

Through the Jackson and Bridges decisions, the federal government has made clear that the products are biochemical weapons and the use is a military operation intended to harm and kill recipients.

So cases that are being brought now, still characterizing the products as regulated, medicinal products (“experimental vaccines”); still characterizing recipients as participants in regulated clinical trials; still characterizing government programs as “public health” campaigns; and still characterizing Covid-19 as a “deadly global pandemic;” are being brought under false premises.

In my view, all such cases will continue to be dismissed, by judges following the public health emergency (PHE) and Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) laws and building on the Jackson and Bridges precedents.

This is why I have advocated and still advocate that attorneys draft the factual history and legal argument sections of all post-Jackson, post-Bridges lawsuits, by

1. identifying the enabling statutes, regulations and treaties, and directly challenging their constitutionality;

2. calling the products intentionally-lethal DoD biochemical weapons;

3. characterizing the plaintiffs as military targets of military weapons during a military campaign (Operation Warp Speed); and

4. identifying — as defendants — the men and women running the military campaign in their personal capacities only, as individuals impersonating government officials.

To date, to my knowledge, no attorneys have been interested in filing such cases. I’ve been told it’s because there’s no money in it, either now or in future.

The advantages of such legal strategies are two-fold:

1. They happen to be true accounts of what’s happening, and

2. They have very high potential to educate the public and drive public pressure on Congress and the state legislatures to repeal the enabling laws¹, strip the legal immunities currently held by the people running the programs, and re-assert the US Constitution as superseding and nullifying the United Nations World Health Organization International Health Regulations.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-138421873?source=queue

Ko-fi.com/thejournaloflingeringsanity

The Journal of Lingering Sanity is a reader-supported publication. We are beholden to truth not party.  “The time has come," the Journal said, "To talk of many things: Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax— Of cabbages—and kings— And why the sea is boiling hot— And whether pigs have wings."