When we talk to the vaccinated

I stopped. Nothing to say. Normalcy Bias triumphs critique

All the psychological warfare planning relied on a few elementary truisms. 1. Government does not lie about health 2. Doctors would stop injections if dangerous 3. I am safer (more or less status quo) by going with the flow like my friends, my bosses, my family, my community. Berdyaev: What does the word bourgeois actually mean? It has remained unexplained, though it has been so much used and so often misapplied. Even when superficially used it is a word with a magic power of its own, and its depth has to be fathomed. The word designates a spiritual state, a direction of the soul, a peculiar consciousness of beings. It is neither a social nor an economic condition, yet it is something more than a psychological and ethical one—it is spiritual, ontological. In the very depths of his being, or nonbeing, the bourgeois is distinguishable from the not bourgeois; he is a man of a particular spirit, or particular soullessness. The state of being bourgeois has always existed in the world, and its immortal image is for ever fixed in the gospels with its equally immortal antithesis, but in the nineteenth century it attained its climax and ruled supreme. Though the middle-class society of the last century is so spoken of in the superficial social-economic significance of the term, it is bourgeois in a deeper and more spiritual sense. This middle-class mentality ripened and enslaved human society and culture at the summit of their civilization. Its concupiscence is no longer restricted by man’s supernatural beliefs as it was past epochs, it is no longer kept in bounds by the sacred symbolism of a nobler traditional culture; the bourgeois spirit emancipated itself, expanded, and was at last able to express its own type of life. But even when the triumph of mediocrity was complete a few deep thinkers denounced it with uncompromising power: Carlyle, Nietzsche, Ibsen, Leon Bloy, Dostoievsky, Leontiev—all foresaw the victory of the bourgeois spirit over a truly great culture, on the ruins of which it would establish its own hideous kingdom.

99.99% of the humans in my tiny circle, very tiny circle indeed since the Pandemic, have vaccinated. They have had their children vaccinated. Some are well educated in science up to but not quite through Med School. Others -one is a MacArthur Fellow. Some vaccinated to keep the income stream flowing. Others out of precaution. One so lockdowns would not come back. Some have been very sick after vaccination. Others discover a very rare cancer. I am looked on with pity or amusement as a destitute crank, and as I am not sick with something unknown or something new I shrug and shut up. I know no one wants truth and prefers the tiger on the road.

IS it a post-hoc fallacy to suggest after vaccination illness arises from vaccination? Maybe. Maybe not when pundits insist any illness (any Covid-19 symptoms ) means vaccines are working. Tumors at the injection site, sudden death, other major medical issues are disregarded.

Ah how to enter into the complexity of our hour? Go back to Hitler. Consider Fauci as a petty Hitler, standing in boots too big and casting a shadow too small but like a little. doggie pretending to be a BIG DOG he barks and barks and barks commands.

Romano Guardini wrote Welt und Person (1939) with its criticism of heteronomy and specifically Hitler's regime. In late 1945, however, Guardini moved beyond the subtlety of these three earlier texts and explicitly analyzed the Third Reich in Der Heilbringer in Mythos, Offenbarung und Politik, The German people had permitted heteronomy to displace theonomy during the twelve years of the Third Reich. Why had they allowed this tyranny to come about? Since the human subconscious operates on the basis of images, symbols, and myths, it is continually applying imaginative constructs to the everyday world in order to uncover the meaning of situations, events, and human interactions. Insofar as these images, symbols, and myths help people make sense of their lives, they influence their ideas, decisions, and actions. Carl Jung was correct, Guardini averred, when he maintained that the human psyche's "kernel of meaning," as expressed in human beings' collective unconscious, is so primary in human cognition that it has not diminished after the Enlightenment.

We have moved to a historical consciousness and empirical approaches to the natural world and society, they still depend upon images, symbols, and myths in their search for life's meaning. Hence, they often view their political leaders through their mostly unconscious, collective images of savior-figures. While some of these imaginative constructs are beneficial, others are destructive. Indeed, some elements of the uncon- scious can unleash the human psyche's sub-human, "demonic" forces, with the result that ordinary people will harm their vulnerable neighbors or, at least, watch passively as state officials inflict suffering upon men, women, and children.

In Guardini's judgment, Hitler gained control over the subconscious of the German people. He allured people's imaginations into his ideology of "blood and race" and then manipulated German citizens into acting as his pawns.

Hitler, as Germany's Heilbringer, its bearer of God's favor. Giving himself the title Führer, he claimed absolute competence concerning politics, military strategy, science, economics, as well as art and music. He even assumed the role of the "messenger of God," the mediator between God and the "Arian race." He insisted, for example, that new buildings include the inscription, "For everything, we thank our Führer." Also, the Führer transferred to himself the images that Christians apply to Jesus Christ. For instance, the Nazi Party distributed pictures of Hitler standing among children and looking down at them in a paternal during the Third Reich, see Heinz R. Kuehn, "Fires in the Night 1920-1950," in Krieg,

Romano Guardini: Proclaiming the Sacred 1-14, and also Regina Kuehn, "Romano

Guardini in Berlin," ibid. 87-91.

VAERS data show 2,000 percent increase in reports of brain injuries following COVID-19 vaccination

Brian Shilhavy of the website Global Research examined data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and found a shocking increase in reports of brain damage following the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination.

“I found out that there is a 2,000 percent or more increase in brain injuries being reported after COVID-19 shots,” he said.

There were 64 cases reported per month since the COVID-19 vaccine distribution started in December 2020. In comparison, there were 1,068 encephalopathy cases reported after other FDA-approved vaccines in the past 30 years for an average of fewer than three cases a month.

Shilhavy also said there is a very clear correlation with increased vaccinations of children with rising rates of autism in the United States, although government health agencies refuse to acknowledge any causal effect between the bloated childhood vaccine schedule and diagnoses of autism. (Related: VAERS records overwhelming adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines in first two months of 2022.)