Repeal the Laws of Kuzdu

We must Revolt My Darlings, there is no alternative

On the significance of 21 USC 360bbb-3(k): "use" of EUA products "shall not constitute clinical investigation."

The primary purpose of all the statutory, regulatory changes and guidance document revisions year after year, page after page, is to keep people from, first, understanding the war crimes as war crimes, and — if people do figure it out — keep them chasing their tails trying to find the FDA loophole that the war criminals somehow failed to close, through which somebody might someday be able to get them to stop killing us.

In the meantime, they just keep killing, and we don’t find loopholes, because the complexity of the web is impenetrable, and the program is not an FDA-regulated medical treatment program anyway: it’s a military-operated global genocide.

I try to maintain attention and expand understanding of demonstrable fact sets and the moral judgments that follow once those acts are accurately perceived:

"What they are doing is intentional killing, and intentionally killing people is wrong.”

And I try to participate in the global struggle to stop the killing by helping to mobilize political and social pressure on lawmakers to use international and federal criminal laws to stop the cull and bring the killers to justice; repeal the enabling laws and put in place new laws that better protect people from socially- and economically- coerced submission to mass murderers pretending to be everything other than what they are.

Another way to think about 21 USC 360bbb-3(k):

It’s the provision that quietly nullified every substantive way in which FDA regulatory functions would have been fulfilled, rendering the entire FDA performance a sham intended only to shield from public view, that the operation was and is actually run under 50 USC Ch. 32, the Chemical and Biological Warfare Program.