I do not understand why anyone is surprised that a Chinese Communist agent fully supported by the elected leadership and presumably rank and file of the Duopoly is totally supported by the Congress of the United States. Why of course he is demolishing the country. If he was not expected to do this would he be President today? Would Congress not impeach?
This is why Trump is totally absurd. Absurd because the 9/11/01 Vichy USA of the Globalists surrendered to the WEF Reich and installed a Chinese agent. Does this give one pause? NO. Trump is the last gasp of futile hope as the serfs mount the scaffold shouting long live the TRUE President. Well. Ok then. A CIA grifter (see Resorts International that brought Trump to Atlantic City) vs. a Chicom Grifter who has risen bribe by bribe to the Presidency as the ultimate rubber stump of Chinese policy.
How are you idiots going to change this with a vote? Where does this stupid idea arise? You fools lost by treason in 2020 and said in 2021 after January 6 all good with political punishment as if in Super-Max thought we really salivate at Guantanamo.
Have you intelligents no honor? There is no rescue by any white hats for there are no white hats. Only self interested humans doing what they can SAFELY. No real risk yet. Retirement comes. Calculations go simply like I am Ok and in the job safer with steady income even if folks are hurt, lucky that policy I only execute not determine.
Ordinary folks doing safe protest or not protesting at all but busy making bank for the hard times to come. After the year turns however I do anticipate a hardening of State heart and folks busy with this idiotic look the other way, hope for the election process will find themselves facing a bayonet and gulag.
Aimee Cesaire-First we must study how colonization works to decivilize the
colonizer, to brutalize him in the true sense of the word, to degrade
him, to awaken him to buried instincts, to covetousness, violence,
race hatred, and moral relativism; and we must show that each time
a head is cut off or an eye put out in Vietnam and in France they
accept the fact, each time a little girl is raped and in France they
accept the fact, each time a Madagascan is tortured and in France
they accept the fact, civilization acquires another dead weight, a
universal regression takes place, a gangrene sets in, a center of
infection begins to spread; and that at the end of all these treaties
that have been violated, all these lies that have been propagated, all
these punitive expeditions that have been tolerated, all these pris
oners who have been tied up and "interrogated," all these patriots
who have been tortured, at the end of all the racial pride that has
been encouraged, all the boastfulness that has been displayed, a poison has been distilled into the veins of Europe and, slowly but
surely, the continent proceeds toward savagery.
And then one fine day the bourgeoisie is awakened by a terrific
boomerang effect: the gestapos are busy, the prisons flll up, the torturers
standing around the racks invent, refine, discuss.
People are surprised, they become indignant. They say: "How
strange! But never mind-it's Nazism, it will pass!" And they wait,
and they hope; and they hide the truth from themselves, that it is
barbarism, the supreme barbarism, the crowning barbarism that
sums up all the daily barbarisms; that it is Nazism, yes, but that
before they were its victims, they were its accomplices; that they
tolerated that Nazism before it was inflicted on them, that they
absolved it, shut their eyes to it, legitimized it, because, until then,
it had been applied only to non-European peoples; that they have
cultivated that Nazism, that they are responsible for it, and that
before engulfing the whole edifice ofWestern, Christian civilization
in its reddened waters, it oozes, seeps, and trickles from every crack.
Yes, it would beworthwhile to srudy clinically, in detail, the steps
taken by Hitler and Hitlerism and to reveal to the very distin
guished, very humanistic, very Christian bourgeois of the twentieth
century that without his being aware of it, he has a Hitler inside
him, that Hitler inhabits him, that Hitler is his de mon, that if he
rails against him, he is being inconsistent and that, at bottom, what
he cannot forgive Hitler for is not the crime in itself, the crime against
man, it is not the humiliation ofman as such, it is the crime against
the white man, the humiliation of the white man, and the fact that
he applied to Europe colonialist procedures which until then had
been reserved exclusively for the Arabs of Algeria, the "coolies" of
India, and the "niggers" of Africa.
And that is the great thing I hold against pseudo-humanism:
that for too long it has diminished the rights of man, that its concept
of those rights has been-and still is-narrow and fragmentary, incom
plete and biased and, all things considered, sordidly racist.
I have talked a good deal about Hitler. Because he deserves it:
he makes it possible to see things on a large scale and to grasp the
fact that capitalist society, at its present stage, is incapable of
establishing a concept of the rights of all men, just as it has proved
incapable of establishing a system of individual ethics. Whether one
likes it or not, at the end of the blind alley that is Europe, I mean the
Europe of Adenauer, Schuman, Bidault, and a few others, there is
Hitler. At the end of capitalism, which is eager to outlive its day,
there is Hitler. At the end of formal humanism and philosophic
renunciation, there is Hitler.
And this being so, I cannot help thinking of one of his state
ments: "We aspire not to equality but to domination. The country
of a foreign race must become once again a country of serfs, of
agricultural laborers, or industrial workers. It is not a question of
eliminating the inequalities among men but ofwidening them and
making them into a law."
That rings clear, haughty, and brutal, and plants us squarely in
the middle of howling savagery. But let us come down a step.
Who is speaking? I am ashamed to say it: it is the Western
humanist, the "idealist" philosopher. That his name is Renan is an
accident. That the passage is taken from a book entitled La Riforme
intellectuelle et morale, that it was written in France just after a war
which France had represented as a war of right against might, tells
us a great deal about bourgeois morals. https://timrdoc.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/cesaire-aime-from-a-discourse-on-colonialism/
Ko-fi.com/thejournaloflingeringsanity