Winter cometh. Immune systems are compromised. Money tight.. Election turmoil. Holiday stress.
And sudden death and hearts beat badly.
And new boosters coming for true believers.
Get tight and get right with being safe every 6 months.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/09/17/poll-most-americans-have-received-at-least-3-coronavirus-shots/
Overall, 72 percent said they have received at least one shot, while 28 percent said they have not received any shot whatsoever.
The survey continued, asking the vaccinated to reveal how many shots they have had. Perhaps unexpectedly, most, 58 percent, said they have received “at least three shots,” while 33 percent said they have received at least two shots, and nine percent said one.
However, Americans seem to be slowing after three shots, as 69 percent, overall, said they have only had three shots — no more than that. Yet, most indicated that they desire to get another— 45 percent said they want one eventually, compared to 27 percent who said “right away” and 28 percent who said they do not want any more.
It is not that things actively elude our minds, but that our knowledge cannot reach them. Its activity cannot penetrate to the wall nature of things, or disturb the serene calm of their essences, the "otium cum dignitate of the thing-in-itself."
We can know only appearances, not the ultimate (which is also the real) nature of things. In Kantian language, our knowledge is only of phenomena not of Noumena. § 12. Now, as we have already pointed out il 3~6)» t^^ absurdity of making unknowable realities, the causes of phenomena, it is here merely necessary to point out how this assumption, in Kant's special form, is refuted by himself, and contradicts his own clearly enunciated principles.
Kant himself lays great stress on the fact that all the categories or fundamental conceptions of our knowledge have a value and a meaning only relatively to the world of our experience, in his own phrase, are '' of Immanent application." Now chief among these categories are the conceptions of Substance and Cause. Hence, on Kant's own showing, the unknowable Noumena can be neither substances nor causes. And yet, unless they are both, we can neither say that they are, nor that they are the causes of phenomena. They are not substances, i.e., they do not exist, they are not causes, i.e., if they did, they would explain nothing. It remains that they are nothing, and that Kant's doctrine of the unknowable Noumena Is a mistake.
That this is so, has been generally admitted by all competent critics of Kant ; but it is astonishing that this result should have led so few of them to question the soundness of the basis from which Kant was able to reach such absurd conclusions.» (Riddles of the sphinx; a study in the philosophy of evolution, Schiller, F. C. S. (Ferdinand Canning Scott), 1864-1937). PocketBook Reader