Newsome's master asks

Is LA burning? Ought it?

First. The work was not done to clear fire hazards.

Second:

[link to www.fire.ca.gov (secure)]


No link yet..just breaking on FOX. They are calling this the SUNSET Fire and mandatory evacuations have been issued.

The fire broke out near the Hollywood sign and it looks like it is going to move rapidly.

Third:

'Do you owe citizens an apology for being absent whilst their homes were burning? Do you regret cutting the fire department's budget?

@skydavidblevins

questions the mayor of LA, Karen Bass, as she faces backlash regarding the California wildfires. https://trib.al/unMkvcv

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/vital-la-firefighting-equipment-was-handed-ukraine-reports-show-americans-now-caught

LA filled no fire hydrants. Ah a Maui scenario? Mayor in Africa. Can’t be bothered except for photo op.

Photo of DEI bosses of LAFD:

Americans ye are slaves of slaves and do not scrape the ground on your bellies enough! OBEY is the only sound in the skull which resonates. Cherished victimhood for citizen Subs.

Voters for one master or another, quietist, making no waves, paying taxes, accepting the “best of all possible worlds.” And then you burn alive.

In Ellul the characteristics of the technical phenomenon are Autonomy, Unity, Universality, Totalization. Technique obeys a specific rationality. The characteristics of technical progress are self-augmentation, automization, absence of limits, casual progression, a tendency toward acceleration, disparity, and ambivalence. Nevertheless, technique is lacking in one of the essential characteristics found in any organized ensemble, reaction. It is not yet able to control its errors and dysfunctions, to react on its source and modify itself. However, we may now be in the presence of the progressive elaboration of such a reactive capability. The ethical problem, that is human behavior, can only be considered in relation to this system, not in relation to some particular technical object or other. Learning how to use “rightly” or “do good” with such and such a technique does not much matter, since each technique can only be interpreted within the ensemble. If technique is a milieu and a system, the ethical problem can only be posed in terms of this global operation. Behavior and particular choices no longer have much significance. What is required is thus a global change in our habits or values, the rediscovery of either an existential ethics or a new ontology.

https://ellul.org/themes/ellul-and-technique/

Berdyaev writes - The rationalisation, the technisation, the machinisation of the whole of human life and of the human soul itself cannot but provoke a reaction against itself. This reaction existed during the XIX Century. The romantics always protested against the might of technology, the dissociating of the organic wholeness, and they appealed to nature, to the elemental foundation within man. A strident protest against technology was made by Ruskin. He did not want to reconcile even with the railroad and he journeyed in a carriage parallel to the rail tracks. The romantic reaction against technology is understandable and even indispensible, but it is impotent, it either does not decide the problem or it resolves it too easily. To return to former times, to the organic lifestyle, to the patriarchal relationships, to the old forms of the familial economy and handicrafts, to the life with nature, with the land, with plants and animals, is impossible. And indeed this return would be undesirable, for it is connected with an exploitive use of people and animals. In this is the tragedy of the position. And it remains but for spirit creatively to define its own relationship towards technology and towards the new epoch, to master technology in the name of its own ends. Christianity ought creatively to define an attitude towards the new actuality. It cannot be too optimistic. But it also cannot run away from the human reality. This presupposes an exertion of spirituality, an intensification of the inner spiritual life. Soul-emotive sentimentalism within Christianity has become already impossible. Soulful emotionality cannot bear up under the harsh reality. Indifference is possible only for the hardened, the obdurate spirit. Spirit can be an organiser, it can master the technical for its own spiritual ends, but it would have to resist itself being turned into a tool of the organising technical process. In this is the tragedy of spirit.

DEI arises from dead souls. Bizzare to replace nobler human nature with ideology but we do so in a free system. WE want to obey Bentham. Perhaps the latent Anglo-Saxon culture does this to us or our modified Prussian educational model for factory workers not intelligent beings. Bentham wants to crush human nature and imprison it for the greatest abstraction of all-”The Greater Good.” DEI too, for the “Greater Good” race and sexuzal orientation is very important, far more important than intelligence and ability. People who accept this thought strangled the human within and are guilty of murder.