The Reset cloaks itself with good intentions, such as sustainable development and “zero-rate transitions”, but aims at the full deployment of the “fourth industrial revolution”, that is the all-pervading spread of digitalization, cyber technology and artificial intelligences. Transhumanism and the forced reduction of a world population no longer usable in a massive industrial production of a twentieth century are probably the ultimate goals of the current masters of the Earth. And to reach them they increasingly control consciences through the media, the subtle censorship of all dissent, the propagandized "cancel culture" which intends to eliminate the past and rewrite it Orwellian. Finally, they decide to intervene in a local conflict, albeit a geopolitically strategic one, such as the one taking place in Eastern Europe. Indeed, only self-righteous and ill-informed hypocrites can claim that the ongoing war is between Ukraine and Russia. It is between Russia and NATO, the armed arm of Western liberalism. Perhaps the carnage is the point. That's the basis of the Rug-Pull hypothesis, which states that the agents of the NWO are setting up current governments to be dissolved in civil wars, which will allow them to step in and seize power afterwards to manage a vastly reduced global population.
Agamben is a proponent of thought and writing against the systemic forces of science and technology. For Agamben a political life is aimed at the one thing that makes us human – the fact that happiness is always at stake in our living – essential to our form-of-life as humans. For Agamben life can never be separated from its form-of-life but this is precisely what political power attempts to do today as what Agamben terms “pseudo-scientific” ideology has invented the term “biological life” as the secularized term for “naked life.” Naked life, for Agamben is now the dominant form of life everywhere because political power has succeeded in founding itself on a separation of naked life from “form-of-life”.
Archbishop Vigano writes “Faced with reality, however, it is difficult to understand the reason for which the entire world population has allowed itself to be convinced of the existence of a pandemic virus that has yet to be isolated and that it has supinely accepted limitations to personal freedom that at other times would have led to revolution and barricades in the streets. Even more incomprehensible is not so much the absence of a true and proper social and political reaction, but the inability to see reality in all of its crude evidence. But this is due, as we know, to the scientific action of manipulation of the masses that inevitably led to the phenomenon that social psychology calls “cognitive dissonance,” that is, the tension or discomfort we feel in the face of two opposing and incompatible ideas. The psychologist and sociologist Leon Festinger has demonstrated that this discomfort leads us to elaborate these convictions in three ways, in order to reduce the psychological incongruence that dissonance determines: changing one’s attitude, changing the context, or changing one’s behavior. Ordinary people, unable to comprehend or even recognize any rationality in what the media obsessively says about COVID, accept the absurdity of an influenzal virus presented as being more devastating than ebola, because they do not want to accept that their political leaders are lying shamelessly, with the goal of obtaining the social, economic, moral and religious destruction of a world that someone has decided to cancel. They do not know how to accept that the lie can be passed off as truth, that doctors are not curing and indeed are killing their patients, that civil authorities are not intervening to stop crimes and blatant violations, that politicians are all obeying a faceless lobby, that Bergoglio wants to demolish the Church of Christ to replace it with an infernal Masonic parody. Thus, out of this desire to not accept the deception and thus to not want to take a position against it and against those who promote it, they take refuge in the convenient mainstream narrative, suspending judgment and letting others tell them what to think, even if it is irrational and contradictory. Billions of people have voluntarily made themselves slaves, sacrificial victims to the globalist Moloch, allowing themselves to be persuaded of the inevitability of such a surreal and absurd situation. Or better still: the absurdity of what we see and what is told us seems to give greater strength to the reasons of those who, after two hundred years of revolution in the name of a supposed liberty, accept tyranny as a normal fact and go up to the gallows with the resignation of those who are convinced, after all, that they are guilty in some way.”
In the middle chapters of The Fate of Man, Berdyaev catalogues the myriad species of nihilistic deformation by which modernity makes itself evident. In Chapter II, “Dehumanization,” Berdyaev characterizes the modern scene as dissolving the concrete in the abstract. The ideological regimes – and Berdyaev includes the British Empire and North America in the category of ideological regimes – dictate according to a convenient and pallid theory of man rather than to the actual man, the person. Indeed the person looms up before the eyes of that regime as a terror and an obstacle. The demand for conformity (pace Covid-19) and the strict policing of the populous to ensure conformity stem from the perception, which partakes in truth, that the person naturally opposes himself to the state and that the person, metaphysically and theologically speaking, enjoys priority over the state. Modern man espouses Friedrich Nietzsche’s dream of the superman (the commonest theme of every Hollywood summer blockbuster of the last twenty years). Far from transcending himself in any benevolent way, the would-be superman drastically lowers himself. “A bestial cruelty toward man is characteristic of our age,” Berdyaev writes, “and this is more astonishing since it is displayed at the very peak of human refinement, where modern conceptions of sympathy, it would seem, have made impossible the old, barbaric forms of cruelty.” Berdyaev finds this tendency everywhere replicated. “The process of dehumanization is especially notable in modern literature.” In the novels of Marcel Proust and André Gide, for example, “man is decomposed… a whole image no longer exists.” In Malraux and Lawrence man sinks down to his criminal passions or becomes an epiphenomenon of sex.
We need not discuss the rise of “Playboy” culture becoming “Hustler” culture and then becoming LGBQT culture and praise of all perversion and contempt for traditional marriage. And traditional marriage in as time of simple divorce is almost an oxymoron.
Berdyaev observes how “it is noteworthy that at a time when every religious sanction of authority has vanished, we live in a very authoritarian epoch.” The point In Berdyaev’s interpretation, modernity thinks that it can reverse Adam’s fall and reestablish paradise, but it only blindly and dumbly reenacts that fall. It is a case of titanic hubris and of equally titanic nemesis. “The world war and the revolutionary processes which have followed it have a metaphysical significance for the fate of man.” The war put on display, bloodily and destructive, the demonic inhumanity that had long simmered under the veneer of civilization; it showed that the modern utopian conceit expressed a fundamental nihilism which, discovering that it could not create on a godlike level, turned its fury on creation, especially the human portion of that creation, and sought its annihilation. “The war revealed the personality of our civilization,” Berdyaev writes; “it cheapened life, it taught man to take no thought for human life and personality, to consider them as means and instruments in the hands of the fatality of history.” That term personality operates centrally in Berdyaev’s Christian anthropology. Berdyaev as sufficiently important that he repeats it in most of his work in various forms “The tragedy of the situation lies in the fact that great masses of humanity have awakened and come into power at the moment of a falling away from Christianity and the loss of all religious beliefs.”
Del Noce’ own words concerning “the affluent society”:
It is a society that accepts all of Marxism’s negations against contemplative thought, religion and metaphysics; that accepts, therefore, the Marxist reduction of ideas to instruments of production; that, on the other hand, rejects the revolutionary-messianic aspects of Marxism. . . In this regard, it truly represents the bourgeois spirit in its pure state. . . triumphant over . . . transcendent religion and revolutionary thought.
What emerged in the West was not the victory of liberty or democracy (as interpreted ad nauseum by contemporary media), but rather a “new totalitarianism,” along with a new atheism, in a sense more pernicious than those served up by the older atheistic totalitarianism in the East. The deepest roots of totalitarianism are not the mere absence of ballot boxes, but the curtailing of rationality, the ultimate denial of reason’s scope and depth. If there is no transcendent, immutable truth that our reason has access to, then there is no immutable ethics determined by reason, and political authority is in a position to define for itself the right and the wrong. Ethics and culture become subsumed by politics. Under this regime, anyone who attempts to formulate an argument against the state cannot do on any recognizably rational basis. The attempted criticism will be interpreted along the lines of the class/ race/ gender triumvirate. The state need not even get involved in “exposing” such critics. There is never any shortage of academics who are happy to do it; to reveal the class, race and gender biases of “conservatives”puts them on the cutting edge. This is the deepest root of totalitarianism, and Del Noce saw it progressively taking hold in the West. The only truth that exists is that defined by the scientistic-technocratic way of thinking that came to the fore once scientific positivism came to prevail. https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2020/12/14/atheism-the-core-of-modern-western-culture-in-the-thought-of-augusto-del-noce/
I am a little world made cunningly
Of Elements, and an Angelike spright,
Myocarditis is very serious particularly because it is often ‘silent’. Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter
"Dying just before dawn"; the sudden and unexpected deaths we are seeing in young people are most likely from undiagnosed or asymptomatic vaccine-induced myocarditis; catecholamine surge!
If you have not listened to Peter McCullough (a cardiologist who is board-certified in internal medicine and cardiovascular disease), you should. I think when this settles out, he will get a Nobel Prize for medicine, for his work on early treatment (I am proud to be part of his team on that) and his move and success in saving lives across this fraud pan…
We are victorious over this world by fact of our mortality. Christianity built from this mystery. Theosis is not the only thing that characterizes the future: there exists also what we might call a “passive eschatology,” and great danger accompanies it. The defining feature of this passive eschatology has everything to do with the ways in which technology and mechanization transfigure (or, more accurately, disfigure) man as their innovations and methods are blindly and uncritically welcomed and incorporated into human life. This movement thoroughly compromises the being of man: “We face the question, is that being to whom the future belongs to be called man, as previously, or something other?”[17] Given the subsequent colonization of the human person by genetic engineering, hormone treatments, and plastic surgery—just for starters—one would have to conclude that Berdyaev was more than prescient.
Berdyaev, like his contemporaries Martin Heidegger and Rudolf Steiner, warned about the rise of technology and its impact on human flourishing. Though he died in 1948, before the advent of television and well before the totalization of the technological and technocratic which has become the information revolution and the dominance of social media, his words are startlingly (and to some degree terrifyingly) poignant:
The greatest victories of man in the realms of science, as in that of the technical mastery over nature, have become the principal cause of man’s dehumanization. Man is no longer master of the machines which he has invented. Our contemporary mechanized civilization is fatal to man’s inner life, for it destroys his integrity, disfigures his emotional life, makes him the instrument of inhuman processes, and takes away from him all possibility of contemplation by a rapid increase in the tempo of life.[18] https://simoneweilcenter.org/publications/2021/11/28/christianitys-abandonment-of-the-future-nicholas-berdyaev-on-philosophy-prophecy-and-eschatology
According to Friedrich-Georg Jünger, writing during WW2, The Perfection of Technology (orig. Die Perfektion der Technik), modern man’s veneration of technology reveals the Titans of myth. “All technology is of titanic mold,” and man the maker is always of the race of the titans. From his titanic kinship stems his love for the enormous, the gigantic, the colossal; his delight in towering works that impress by their quantity and mass, the vastness of their piled up matter." Ponerology is a scientific discipline devoted to the study of evil. Its name stems from poneros, the Greek word for evil. It aims to apply the methodology and epistemology of science – especially drawing from fields such as biology, medicine and psychology. Technopathocracy is the Titanic impulse. A government viewed as pathocracy, is one in which individuals with personality disorders (especially psychopathy) occupy positions of power and influence. The result is a totalitarian system characterized by a government turned against its own people. Today with the hysteria around deaths from Covid-19, emergency use authorizations for radically new technology euphemistically called vaccines that do nothing to prevent Covid, are forced on people.
I'm certain that since a certain point in time we have been living in a Plato's Cave where kabbalistic luciferian Freemasonry led by Rothschilds and their higher level Illuminati cabal play the shadows on the wall in the form of psyops and propaganda. We're kept chained in place by usury and social engineering, playing the "game" of life according to their constantly changing rules. Put simply we're living in a matrix, what most people see as reality are nothing but these shadows. Everything must be questioned and nothing trusted at this point.