https://publicintelligence.net/restricted-u-s-army-psyops-manual/
FM 3-05.301 Psychological Operations Process Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures
A little dig into old links today.
https://www.zerobin.net/?60cc135924b408b8#s7OUAnwqkyDky0eyL9TmMLiDqwdkvGyrJyu0h51rIlA
SAUL ALINSKY
From the RNC: https://i.sli.mg/XZZpZs.png
Rules for Radicals basics: https://i.sli.mg/G8OkD9.png
In her thesis Clinton compares Alinsky to Martin Luther King:
"In the first chapter it was pointed out that Alinsky is regarded by many as the proponent of a dangerous
socio/political philosophy. As such, he has been feared – just as Eugene Debs or Walt Whitman or Martin
Luther King has been feared, because each embraced the most radical of political faiths — democracy."
Let's listen to Alinsky himself:
"The Have-Nots of the world, swept up in their present upheavals and
desperately seeking revolutionary writings, can find such literature
only from the communists, both red and yellow. Here they can read
about tactics, maneuvers, strategy and principles of action in the
making of revolutions. Since in this literature all ideas are imbedded
in the language of communism, revolution appears synonymous with
communism."
"We have permitted a suicidal situation to unfold wherein revolution
and communism have become one. These pages are committed to
splitting this political atom, separating this exclusive identification of
communism with revolution."
>We need a communist revolution, but let's give it another name, because nobody likes communism.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TAVISTOCK AND CENTRAL BANKS
>SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
>The interest rate set by the Bank of England is known as "the Bank rate", and it is a controlling factor in
interest rates throughout the world, although rates in other countries may be higher or lower than this
"Bank rate". The Bank of England manages the government debt, and is called upon to arbitrate in
political affairs. It served as the intermediary with the Iran revolutionaries in negotiating for the return of
the American hostages--a recent example.
>The present directors of the Bank of England (1982) include Leopold de Rothschild of N.M. Rothschild &
Sons, Sir Robert Clark, chairman of Hill Samuel Bank, the most influential bank after Rothschilds, John
Clay, of Hambros Bank, and David Scholey, of Warburg Bank, and joint chairman of S.C. Warburg Co.
Well, you may ask, wtf does this have to do with Tavistock?
>Few Americans know that almost every development in psychology in the United States in the past
sixty-five years has been directed by the Bureau of Psychological Warfare of the British Army. A short
time ago, the present writer learned a new name, The Tavistock Institute of London, also known as the
Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. "Human relations" covers every aspect of human behavior, and it
is the modest goal of the Tavistock Institute to obtain and exercise control over every aspect of human
behavior of American citizens.
>The Tavistock Institute was taken over by Sir John Rawlings Reese, head of the British Army
Psychological Warfare Bureau....
>James Paul Warburg (son of Paul Warburg who had written the Federal Reserve Act in 1910), financed
a subsidiary of the Tavistock Institute in the United States called the Institute for Policy Studies, whose
director, Marcus Raskin, was appointed to the National Security Council. James Paul Warburg set up a
CIA program to experiment with LSD on CIA agents, some of whom later committed suicide. This
program, MK-Ultra, supervised by Dr. Gottlieb, resulted in huge lawsuits against the United States
Government by the families of the victims.
>The Institute for Policy Studies set up a campus subsidiary, Students for Democratic Society (SDS),
devoted to drugs and revolution. Rather than finance SDS himself, Warburg used CIA funds, some twenty
million dollars, to promote the campus riots of the 1960s.
>The English Tavistock Institute has not restricted its activities to left-wing groups, but has also directed
the programs of such supposedly "conservative" American think tanks as the Herbert Hoover Institute at
Stanford University, Heritage Foundation, Wharton, Hudson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and
Rand. The "sensitivity training" and "sexual encounter" programs of the most radical California groups
such as Esalen Institute and its many imitators were all developed and implemented by Tavistock Institute
psychologists.
>http://www.whale.to/b/m_appi.html
This is where more attention needs to be paid:
>the Tavistock Institute in the United States called the Institute for Policy Studies
>As Washington’s first progressive multi-issue think tank, the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) has served
as a policy and research resource for visionary social justice movements for over four decades — from
the anti-war and civil rights movements in the 1960s to the peace and global justice movements of the
last decade. Some of the greatest progressive minds of the 20th and 21st centuries have found a home at
IPS, starting with the organization’s founders, Richard Barnet and Marcus Raskin. IPS scholars have
included such luminaries as Arthur Waskow, Gar Alperovitz, Saul Landau, Bob Moses, Rita Mae Brown,
Barbara Ehrenreich, Roger Wilkins and Orlando Letelier.
>http://www.ips-dc.org/
> the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) has served as a policy and research resource for visionary social
justice movements for over four decades
Following on this you guys seem to have found Tavistock to be highly involved, as FBI anon predicted by
giving you the following lead : Tavistock is at the heart of everything.
Information on Tavistock is next to impossible to acquire. This information was obtained from Dr.
Coleman's copyrighted material. His book : Dr John Coleman - The Conspirators' Hierarchy - The
Committee of 300
Info on Tavistock :
http://www.barefootsworld.net/tavistok.html
A little on the : Committee of 300
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Committee_of_300
This is also an interesting watch, as I know not all of you like reading stuff :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8NzHfd_bmo
Revolution isn’t necessarily synonymous with communism. The public consciousness is simply wrong about these identifications due to lack of education and brain washing. It is much misunderstood. Native American collective decision making based on consensus and much admired, even copied, by our revolutionary ancestors was hardly communism. The dependence on an ancient, grounded religious/spiritual awareness and respectful division of labor within the group, plus a healthy awareness of ecological interdependence was in many ways superior to European economic/political thinking. Communism has been just as likely to become kleptocratic, fascist as any other system.