Lord of the Flies

After Covid a war to end all wars with One Vaccine Ring to rule all humanity

You may ask yourself how did I get here? Water runs above ground too but no one see’s it on MSM. https://i1.wp.com/theimaginativeconservative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Prometheus.jpg?ssl=1

Intuitively tied to the economic factor is the modern administrative state, which has likewise grown exponentially in terms of size and influence. Gone are the days when the state was defined by the character of its people, their culture and traditions. “The state itself is now conceived by technology as an organization which must be brought to perfection,” Jünger writes. “The technician asserts that the State can properly fulfill its tasks only when it becomes organized on a completely technical basis, when the idea of the state and its purpose are organized into a centralized functionalism, an all-embracing machine which nothing escapes.”

Under the direction of the technocrat, law becomes subservient to the needs of technological organization at the expense of justice. A technocracy favors the generation of flexible statutes and executive decrees over and against the formalistic, traditional type of jurisprudence that tolerates departure from the rule only sparingly. In Jünger’s view, this co-opting of the law is readily apparent in the sustained attacks on personal freedoms and property rights, which place a heavy burden on the technocrat’s dynamic planning because of the sense of permanence they bestow:

The technician fights property, not on theoretical grounds, as does the social agitator; he actually transforms it by subjecting it to his all powerful organization which disposes of it freely from rational points of view. Foremost he attacks the right to land; for landed property he feels that loathing which the dynamic mind has for all that is immobile.

Left Hemisphere dominance. Control. Grasping. Manipulating. Planning by objectives unconnected to Right Hemisphere contact with actual reality. A Phantasm. The A.I. Yellow Emperor-or the A.I. Solomon

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Huangdi

Tensions begin to rise in Israel AGAINST Benjamin Netanyahu’s, as he's blamed for "Israel 911" and COVID forced vaccinationsNo jab, no job, remember?0120N/A10/13/23
9:04 AM10/13/23
9:04 AM

Question for the Israelis, when you go to war with Hamas, does it bother you benjamin netanyahu tried to force vaccinate you?The promise land my ass5118
(2)10/11/23
10:21 AM10/11/23
10:57 AM

Anyone here from Israel? Does everyone hate benjamin netanyahu? He forced vaccinated you all and now you are at war!!It's bibi's fault060N/A10/11/23
10:13 AM10/11/23
10:13 AMNetanyahu Keeps Syringe From His Coronavirus Vaccine on Display in His OfficeAnonymous Coward6268
(2)06/26/22
2:43 AM06/26/22
6:52 AMIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has proposed a law that would allow the names of people who have not taken the vaccine to be sent to loAnonymous Coward0107N/A02/15/21
4:34 PM02/15/21
4:34 PMIsrael can be "global test case" for vaccine roll-out, Netanyahu tells WEFAnonymous Coward24342
(2)01/27/21
4:06 PM01/29/21
6:46 PM

Breaking news! Benjamin Netanyahu to force vaccinate all Israeli over 16 years of age by March 22 2021!chips in the vaccine20454
(1)01/08/21
9:23 AM01/08/21
10:34 AMNetanyahu visits a clinic to congratulate Israel’s “one millionth vaccine” who just turns out to be a double murdererAnonymous Coward5269
(4)01/03/21
3:10 AM01/03/21
4:07 AMPM @netanyahu says he wants to be the first Israeli to get vaccinated against coronavirusAnonymous Coward3115
(1)12/09/20
2:43 AM12/09/20
2:59 AMPutin, Netanyahu agree two countries cooperation in developing COVID19 vaccine - POTUS China either made a terrible mistake or it was incompetencmoney$$$1186N/A05/08/20
8:04 AM05/08/20
8:05 AM

18 months for vaccine and 18 months when Netanyahu has to turn over power to Gantz....Anonymous Coward5251
(1)04/29/20
10:36 PM04/30/20
3:33 PMNetanyahu and the Knesset: I read how you have ordered millions of these dangerous yet-untested swine flu vaccines
Page 1, 2

https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-invasion-of-gaza-operation-cast-lead-part-of-a-broader-israeli-military-intelligence-agenda/11606

“We are going to attack Gaza City very broadly soon,” Israel’s chief military spokesman, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, said in a nationally broadcast address, without giving a timetable for the attack.”

It’s a criminal undertaking based on Israel’s doctrine of “Justified Vengeance” which was first formulated in 2001.

(See below: my January 2009 article published at the very outset of Israel’s 2008-2009 invasion of Gaza under “Operation Cast Led”)

The “Justified Vengeance” doctrine propounds in no uncertain terms that (despite its limited military capabilities) Palestine rather than Israel is “the Aggressor” and that Israel has the right to defend itself.

It is now established that the Hamas October 7, 2023 attack was a False Flag operation carried out by a “faction” within Hamas, in liaison with Mossad and U.S. intelligence:

“U.S. intelligence say they weren’t aware of an impending Hamas attack.

Did Netanyahu and his vast military and intelligence apparatus (Mossad et al) have foreknowledge of the Hamas attack which has resulted in countless deaths of Israelis and Palestinians.

Was a carefully formulated Israeli plan to wage an all out war against Palestinians envisaged prior to the launching by Hamas of “Operation Al-Aqsa Storm”?

This was not a failure of Israeli Intelligence, as conveyed by the media. Quite the opposite”

==

Since the Wilson years, and mainly post WW2, a tripartite imperialist alliance between Britain, the U.S., and world Zionism. Ultimately, this triangle of wrong forced them through mutual agreements and abuses of international law concerning Palestine. (Rateb Sweiti – 2008) In 1996, the Washington Post published a chapter from J.J. Goldberg’s “Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment.” The chapter summarizes what American Zionists represented three decades ago.

“From the Vatican to the Kremlin, from the White House to Capitol Hill, the world’s movers and shakers view American Jewry as a force to be reckoned with.”

In 1925, Jabotinsky separated from the mainstream Zionist organization, the Weizmann-led World Zionist Organization, to form the “Revisionist” Zionist party. The term conveyed his desire to “revise” Zionism to return to Herzl’s goal of establishing a Jewish state as soon as possible, on the entire area outlined in the League of Nations Mandate. Mainstream Zionists preferred ambiguity about the ultimate meaning of a “Jewish homeland” and the timetable on which to establish a state. Jabotinsky also opposed the socialist orientation of the mainstream Zionists; he thought a socialist economy would fail, and that it discriminated against entrepreneurial Jews. He wanted a state, immediately, for Jews of all classes and callings, from farmers to physicians.

Jabotinsky was more realistic than Labor Zionists about the Palestinian Arabs. He considered the belief that Jewish and Arab workers would unite on class lines to be naïve, and he wrote that forcing Arabs from Palestine was “totally out of the question.” He believed there would always be two peoples in Palestine; his goal was only that the Jews become the majority in their own state, and provide equal civil and religious rights for all citizens, whether Jewish or Arab.

In his 1923 essay “The Iron Wall,” Jabotinsky predicted that the Jews in Palestine would face ceaseless Arab violence until they convinced the Arabs that they could not force the Jews to flee. Since the Zionists were committed to equal rights, peace did not depend “on our attitude to the Arabs, but entirely on the attitude of the Arabs to us and to Zionism.” He predicted they would resist a Jewish state “as long as there remains a solitary spark of hope” that they could prevent its creation. He envisioned eventual discussions of “Arab national integrity,” but thought such discussions were both premature and counterproductive before Arab acceptance of a Jewish state.

In his companion essay, “The Ethics of the Iron Wall,” Jabotinsky cited a Talmudic story to illustrate his view. Two men find a piece of cloth on the road. “A” says “I found it. It’s mine.” But “B” says: “No, I found it, and it’s mine.” They take their dispute to a judge and A—hoping to impress the judge with his magnanimity—says: “We both found the cloth, and therefore I ask only half of it, because the second half belongs to B.” Jabotinsky noted the Talmudic teaching is “very disappointing to our magnanimous gentleman”:

The judge says: “There is agreement about one half of the cloth. ‘A’ admits that it belongs to B. So it is only the second half that is in dispute. We shall, therefore divide this into two halves.” And the obstinate claimant gets three-quarters of the cloth, while the “gentleman” has only one quarter, and it serves him right. It is a very fine thing to be a gentleman, but it is no reason for being an idiot. Our ancestors knew that. But we have forgotten it. We should bear it in mind. …
It is incredible what political simpletons Jews are. They shut their eyes to one of the most elementary rules of life, that you must not “meet halfway” those who do not want to meet you.[Emphasis added]. https://www.thetower.org/article/why-jabotinsky-still-matters/

The tradition of Jewish dissent against Zionism has taken many forms. From the moment Theodore Herzl strode upon the world stage, many of us have insisted that leaving the diaspora for a Jewish nation-state is the wrong way to achieve safety, fight antisemitism, actualize Jewish identity, and work for justice in the world. Many have claimed that our peoples’ relationship to the land of Israel is far more complicated than a narrow nationalist vision can allow, or that we are religiously forbidden, at this time, from setting up a Jewish state in the holy land. And many have protested Israel’s dispossession of the Palestinians indigenous to the land of Israel.

Though these arguments, and many others, animated Jewish life and discourse for generations, they are too often forgotten in today’s mainstream discourse, buried under the mistaken assumption that all Jews have always supported Zionism.

But today, as more Jews are awakening to the depth of Israel’s unjust oppression of Palestinians, there is a real thirst for new Jewish identities, to guide us through these troubled times. In order to dream the Jewish future beyond Zionism, we need to trace the Jewish past beyond Zionism.

This article seeks to uncover the lineages of difference and dissent, the moments in history when alternatives appeared on the horizon. This concise survey of modern Jewish non- and anti-Zionist history cannot, of course, do full justice to these issues in all their complexity; the reader is encouraged to use this overview as a starting point for further research.

https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2019/01/12/a-partial-history-of-jewish-alternatives/

Ko-fi.com/thejournaloflingeringsanity

The Journal of Lingering Sanity is a reader-supported publication. We are beholden to truth not party.  “The time has come," the Journal said, "To talk of many things: Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax— Of cabbages—and kings— And why the sea is boiling hot— And whether pigs have wings."