Europe in the Cold and Dark
Clown World
Difficult to determine why European governments take the knee and obey the USA to throttle their economies. As a matter of course the “Mis-Leadership” obeys the USA who obeys the WEF, except freezing in winter is not good politics domestically and when trucks and consumers cannot drive this has consequences.
Davos using the Ukraine conflict for the Great Reset is going to harm many.
https://thesaker.is/europe-now-cheats-or-suffers/
You just can´t have 35% of the plants processing and/or running with “good” Russian oil still fed by the Druzbha pipeline… while the remaining 65% run on “bad” unknown non-Russian seaborne oil. It just doesn´t work that way.
Basic laws of physics, chemistry, geology, logistics, engineering, politics, business and trade are being violated without mercy by such an approach. Economies are integral, non-divisible. Will any Karens fill up their fuel tanks with “bad” gasoline / petrol derived from “badly” refined non-Russian oil… or intermittently supplied at filling stations on and off as in now-you-have-it but then you don´t ? What about trucks and plant machinery ? Petrochemicals anyone ?
Will any businesses want to deal with and buy products from associates processing new, yet unknown non-Russian oil blends plagued with problems of every sort derived from their lack of proper matching with their now necessarily hurriedly modified & retrofitted processing plants ? Reference #3 below describes the severe harmful differences between Russian and non-Russian oil blends regarding reservoirs + investments + price + quality + quantity + delivery + refinery feed + Baltic ports modifications + logistics + refine-ability + vendor performance + contract sustainability,etc.
Yep, thanks, of course these don’t make sense. They never did. In fact there are so many logical fallacies we may point out in the self defeating policies and aims of the so called “leftist” factions. Not even sure where we would begin or end. So many to point out. They will/are losing. Yet the amount of damage they have caused and the issue of how to prevent these in the future is a huge problem to face. Business governments as usual are not an option.
Fukushima in my opinion - unlike Tonga which very likely was a nuclear blast underwater- was - if the tsunami was not generated by a detonation- a result of the type of reactor. Dale Bridenbaugh helped assess the design of the Mark 1 nuclear reactor upon its creation back in 1975. His findings portray an extreme lack of confidence in the reactor’s ability to contain pressure in case of a meltdown. Bridenbaugh and two engineering colleagues couldn’t handle the pressure themselves, leading them to drop out of the project and resign their positions with the company.
The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant contains six total reactors, five of which are Mark 1s. And the problem the reactors are facing – a loss of power, leading to cooling uranium rods and rising pressure inside the core – is precisely the issue that drove Bridenbaugh’s resignation from General Electric. The reactors “did not take into account the dynamic loads that could be experienced with a loss of coolant,” Bridenbaugh told ABC News.