https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/22/davos-fauci-and-bancel-are-perturbed-by-misinformation/
First the frame: He (Illich) explains that Medical Nemesis was written to justify the art of living, enjoying and suffering and dying even in the modern culture, shaped by the ideas of progress and comfort, and explains why, in the era of systems, he can no longer use the expression “autonomous coping”. Four years later he spoke during a conference in Bologna: “Lead us not into diagnosis, but deliver us from the evils of health”, as he explains how the pursuit of health dissolves our flesh and our self. In 1999, in his last conversations with David Cayley, he explained how “risk awareness”—which is today the very core of the policies and attitudes about Covid-19—generates the loss of the sense of our bodies and is “the most important religiously celebrated ideology today.” As we currently observe every day, risk is a mathematical concept, which cannot be applied to any person in particular. It is applied to populations and what can happen to them is expressed in terms of probability. The now common idea of “flattening the curve” is but one instance of risk management applied to populations. To identify oneself with this statistical figment (as millions are doing every day) is to engage, Illich said, in “intensive self-algorithmization,” the effect of which disconnects us from our own bodies, while reducing each to a collection of statistical elements.
In the last twenty years of his life, Illich expressed repeatedly his increasing concern with the condition imposed on the people, who can no longer die their own death, those denied a dignified death. In place of the art of dying, which in every culture always expressed a fundamental element of the art of living, an abstract medical intervention reigned. Only a month ago, a medical doctor, a sensitive woman who works in a Covid unit of a Mexican social security hospital, shared with me her anxiety, her suffering, when she was unable to respect the will of a 98 year-old guy who pleaded, from his bed in the hospital: “Please allow me to go to my home, to be with my daughter and my grandson. I don’t want to live any longer. But I want to die in my bed, with my loved ones. I want to die in dignity.” But he was not allowed to go. And the family was not allowed to accompany him in his burial. Against all cultural traditions, funerals were not allowed...to “protect” the people, the body of the beloved family member was deemed a threat.////
Author’s note: If you were ever in any doubt that you were unable to spot the village idiot, watch Fauci’s answer. You will either smack the palm of your hand to your forehead or laugh in disbelief.
What is the best-case scenario as per the daily prediction to achieve herd immunity?
12:22 Fauci: “That is going to be very difficult calculation because when you talk about herd immunity and you talk about the protection in the community where you combine those who’ve been vaccinated with durable protection and those who’ve been infected recovered with durable protection.
“However, when you have a virus in which the infection causes immunity that seems to wane rather quickly. In addition, when you’re dealing with a vaccine – that’s a an extraordinarily successful and protective vaccine – where the immunity also wanes … we’re dealing with a very complicated situation here that makes our classic definition of herd immunity very elusive.”
Author’s note: So, he doesn’t really know the answer then.
How can we bridge the divide between believers and non-believers?
14:53 Fauci: “You know, one of the things that that we, I believe the entire world is facing, but we certainly are facing it in a very, very disconcerting way in the United States is the amount of disinformation that is accompanying what should be a problem where everyone pulls together against the common enemy which is the virus.”
Author’s note: It depends what “the virus” is. If he asked, he may find out the common enemy, “the virus” you could say, is the medical / scientific dictatorship he promotes. Also, the wording of the question – “believers and non-believers” – are they acknowledging that Covid is a matter of faith rather than of science?
Is there a right way to encourage people to get vaccinated?
17:01 Bancel: “There’s always a better job that we can all do, starting from the [pharmaceutical] companies in terms of explaining the science, explaining the side effects, explain the long-term benefit and the risk-reward of getting a vaccine versus not getting a vaccine … But as Tony said, what is sad is all the misinformation that we are seeing every day – online, sometimes on TV – about the vaccine and what they do and what they don’t do is really sad.”
Author’s note: Yes, please do explain the ill effects of the Covid injections. The corporate media is propagating a lot of misinformation and disinformation and there is a corporate media black-out regarding the unprecedented sickness, injury and death these injections are causing. Another thing, what does “risk-reward” mean? Please, do explain.
Fauci’s “Disinformation”
We leave the Davos Agenda discussion at this question as the preceding text is sufficient to get a feel for the nature of the “experts” discussion without having to endure the entire session. And, it’s at this point we join a commentary by Robert Gouveia, host of Watching the Watchers.
In the video below, Gouveia summarised the key points from Day 1 of WEF’s Davos Agenda 2022, beginning with some background to WEF and its members followed by commentary on this year’s opening speech by “special guest” Xi Jinping, leader of the Chinese Communist Party.
For anyone who is unfamiliar with WEF we recommend watching it from the beginning, however we have embedded it to begin at the point where Gouveia discussed excerpts from the session: Covid-19: What’s Next?