Crown Virus
The truth is we don't know the origins of Covid 19 yet for sure. We don't have a smoking gun,” Wenstrup said.
Sun shines smoothly streaming into the 1908 studio apartment at 48 degrees, between the rain storms on a partly clouded winter’s day in early March I almost feel like cakewalking into town and strolling in to the Mechanic’s Institute library to order books from afar as once three years ago I did. Covid came but library loans ended for a period. I looked for free pdf’s. Improverished and was doing life just as now without a job living on the thin edge waiting for the meat cleaver cook from the heart of Bureaucracy to start the butchery for the anthropophagite feast. Reading helped remove my thoughts of the chef and fix them on the process of totalitarian globalism. Reading and writing and then after reading and thinking but a little while, intervention after intervention censored by Facebook until it became whack-a-mole daily with Community Standards invoked or Hate Speech or Fake News.
Typing mocking denials of the liars or posting images saw my deplatforming for several months. And as all the arrows I launched against the Tyrants had hit by speaking truly saying I know everything surrounding Covid is deeply embedded in biowar economic military complex, like medicine, like science, like politics, like atomized man, but truth alone cannot kill the striding Giant, but I had rolls of quarters used for laundry as a weapon and Substack as my sling to launch my next assault against the Borg butchery.
https://truthcomestolight.com/la-quinta-columna-analysis-of-a-single-drop-of-the-pfizer-vaccine-as-of-december-26-2022/
https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2023/Moderna-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Fiscal-Year-2022-Financial-Results-and-Provides-Business-Updates/default.aspx
Covid pandemic drives Pfizer’s 2022 revenue to a record $100 billion
AstraZeneca annual gross profit for 2022 was $31.96B, a 27.94% increase from 2021. AstraZeneca annual gross profit for 2021 was $24.98B, a 17.18% increase from 2020. AstraZeneca annual gross profit for 2020 was $21.318B, a 9.53% increase from 2019.
Writing in 1990, the Russian poet Joseph Brodsky could already see how the next decade would be one of chaos and contradictions, but he also understood the close connection between chaos and political power, at least in Russia: ‘This chaos and these contradictions are, in fact, a guarantee of the stability of power that is attempting to create order out of chaos and to find solutions to problems.’ He also noted that the last days of the Soviet Union could not but become an object of universal fascination by the way they evidenced an existential truth. In a world bereft of the power of revealed religion, we have to face up to the fact that no one knows how to live. Some will settle on some routine or other and never ask the question of how they should spend their limited years on this planet. The political regime under which they live, including democracy if that is the case, will push or tilt them in a certain direction and provide comfort that whatever life one leads is as close as possible to the ideal. Brodsky thought that it was to the credit of the dying Soviet government that it did not even try to evade, simplify, or disguise the question. There was no answer, there was no meaning to life, and people had simply to live with that.
Ah I say in Brodsky’s defense -At the age of 15 Brodsky dropped out of school and went to work in a factory. He would later claim that he just couldn’t stand some of his classmates and teachers, the omnipresent Lenin and Stalin portraits and the obnoxious color scheme used on the walls. The poet was frightened by the fact he encountered this everywhere – not just at school, but any other public place, all depersonalized and meaningless in a uniform manner. The poet would never regret not finishing school and skipping university – it was more important, in his own words, that dropping out of school was the first free choice of his life.1963, an article appeared in the newspaper Evening Leningrad, titled “Semiliterary Drone”, in which the author subjected Brodsky to harsh criticism: “… his poems are a mix of decadency, modernism and common gibberish”; the author denounced Brodsky for his supposed disdain for his motherland, and for “conceiving a plan of betrayal.” The article ends with a call to punish Brodsky for so-called “parasitism” – then considered a crime. Brodsky was convicted and spent one and a half years out of five in a labor exile in the village Norenskaya of the Arkhangelsk Region. In the labor camp one day he was challenged by a guard to some friendly socialist competition in tree cutting. Brodsky like man did greatly exceeding his quota and mocking the guard. Thanks to the large public outcry caused by this attempt of the authorities to do something about an inconvenient poet, he was released. Both compatriots and concerned people from abroad supported the poet – by the end of 1964, thanks to French and English publishers, the entire world learned about his trial. However, Brodsky had nowhere to return to. It was almost impossible to incorporate his thinking into the Soviet system. Just as, prior to his arrest, he was translating, writing children’s poems and sometimes getting money for reading poems to circles of interested people.
xxx
But what is in the end the first problem for our country to recognize and assert itself as a people, as a nation, as a society, as a state? We are unable to be a community and we have mortified the sense of community at every level and in every field.
Let's raise our eyes from everyday life and try to go deeper into everyday political and social issues. We are faced with this enormous, fundamental theme, which does not only concern the sphere of politics and civil life, because it also affects private life, the family, the country or neighborhood, the world of work. And Europe is also investing. We fail to be and live as a community. We are able to think about it and behave only as individuals, separated from any civil context and any social bond. Individuals in global solitude. The deadly disease of modern Western societies lies precisely in that individualistic reduction of life and in its consequences in all fields: loneliness and indeed isolation, as the primary trait of our existence; selfishness and egocentrism in the relationship with the world; subjectivity as a criterion of judgment and horizon of life; narcissism as self-sick love and the impossibility of loving others. The only obsessive recommendation that is repeated in social relationships, in couple ties, in psychoanalysis, is to feel good about yourself. It is the paradigm of absolute individualism, what matters is only that, the rest can collapse, ties can be revoked if this categorical imperative is put at risk. Be yourself is the mantra of our age, notes the French philosopher and sociologist Gilles Lipovetsky in the ponderous essay The Fair of Authenticity (now published by Marsilio). Being oneself is a cult value to the point of becoming a fetish. But behind this new idolatry there is still individualism, and its reflexive and vain version, narcissism. There can be no love or lasting ties in a society where narcissism has become pathological and mass: one loves oneself too much to take care of others, to accept others with all their limitations and differences; and to endure over time. The primacy of "feeling good about yourself" surpasses all fidelity, indeed everything becomes fluid and reversible; the only thing that remains and that is valid is the ego and the only concern is his well-being.
With these premises, no community horizon is possible, no social connection, no political affiliation, no group or couple bond. The very idea of family yields to the absolute primacy of the individual. https://www.marcelloveneziani.com/saggi/la-rivoluzione-necessaria-da-individui-a-comunita-2/
https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-anarchia-oggi
On anarchy, today
If for anyone who intends to think about politics, of which it is in some way the extreme focus or vanishing point, anarchy has never ceased to be current, such it is today also for the unjust, ferocious persecution to which a anarchist in Italian prisons. However, speaking of anarchy, as it has also had to be done, on the level of law necessarily implies a paradox, because it is at least contradictory to ask that the state recognize the right to deny the state, just as, if one intends to bring the right to resistance to its ultimate consequences, it cannot reasonably be demanded that the possibility of civil war be legally protected.
In order to think about anarchy today, it will therefore be better to place ourselves in a completely different perspective and rather question the way in which Engels conceived it, when he reproached anarchists for wanting to substitute administration for the state. In fact, this accusation hides a decisive political problem, which neither Marxists nor perhaps the anarchists themselves have correctly posed. A problem all the more urgent, as we are witnessing today the attempt to achieve in some parodic way what was for Engels the declared aim of anarchy - and, that is, not so much the simple substitution of the administration for the state, but rather the identification of state and administration in a sort of Leviathan, who assumes the good-natured mask of the administrator. This is what Sunstein and Vermeule theorize in a book (Law and Leviathan, Redeeming the Administrative State ) in which governance , the exercise of the government, exceeding and contaminating the traditional powers (legislative, executive, judicial), exercises in the name of the administration and in a discretionary way the functions and powers which they were due.
https://ko-fi.com/thejournaloflingeringsanity
The truth is they do know the origin.
It was created on a computer.
It’s intent was to scare the hell out of everyone for nefarious purposes
It did because everyone was taught to believe in the con that is known as the “germ theory”
And it’s ugly cousin con called vaccinations
Where they get to inject the poisons they wanted in humans for quite awhile
Those who know, understand there’s no such thing as a “pathogenic virus”
Doesn’t exit in nature or anywhere
Never did
Never will
But you can bet your bottom dollar they will concoct a new one on a computer near you to keep the walking morons scared and afraid with their arms ready to accept the newer poison they want so desperately in them
If I told this to humans 60 years ago they would think I was crazy.
Welcome to the jungle...