A little read Polish writer was vehemently, passionately, anticommunist. In reading him some ideas congealed. The Great Reset is already in my mind fixed as a totalitarian scheme. Covid-19 which is entirely fraud “nearly” brought the pre-Pandemic world to a Leninist closure. Mackiewicz writes on Russia and USSR as being two different worlds. Fighting for the "sovereignty of thought" and the right to express his own opinion, Mackiewicz points out that the Soviet Union prohibited searching for facts, replacing them with slogans and newspeak. He repeatedly returns to this issue in The Triumph of Provocation in which he says the following of the Soviet Union:
All the problems of the world had already been solved by Lenin and it was necessary only to learn answers by heart. Doubt became punishable, and where there is no doubt there can be no reflection and, therefore, no inquiring minds. And so old Russia, famous--perhaps to an exaggerated degree--for its "hair-splitting," was transformed into a collective, repeating mechanically the verses of the Leninist dogma. (TTOP 35)
Moreover it still might so long as the ideological lies are maintained by mass sewage media and various scribblers sustaining the Big Lie. Currently mRNA in the mandated lethal injections is blamed for sudden death, the Covid-19 spike protein is held responsible. At least among dissenters to mandates holding tight to some standard of scientific integrity which does not exist. After all, the few vials analyzed show next to no mRNA or any, but do present many strange objects including ones which self assemble. However ignoring truth out of deferring to words our anti-injection writers prefer to not go down this unscientific mass murder road.
Mackiewicz presented the tenets of Soviet political thought in a similarly emotional and sharp tone:
Their invention is the Lie raised to an umptieth power, guarded by
draconian laws, carried on to such an open shamelessness that it
becomes overwhelming. There is no place in it for the will of the
general public. Yet on every corner and doorstep, in newspapers,
books, or calendars, on the radio, every day, every hour they say
that everything that takes place in the state is in accordance with
the will of the general public. In the Soviet Union an absolute
slavery prevails because the citizenry is deprived of elementary
civic liberties, of every single one of them. All that is left are
dejection, despair, soft whispers, and fear. But it is said from on
high that "everybody is happy, free and smiling." And it is not
just said on high, every citizen should repeat it as a forced
prayer, at work and outside work, at home and in the street. Those
who are not glad and smiling will be invited to the NKVD.
Lies are the base of laws, lies are omnipresent in school books,
lies underlie literature, history, poetry, press, everything,
including private conversations.
Nobody is happy within the Soviet system but everybody has to
praise it. Day after day ... 200 million people have to take part
in a mental self-flagellation. Here is this peculiar invention,
which has not been used by any of the bloodiest tyrants so far.
(15)
If someone would ask me for the shortest definition of the
Bolshevist system, I'd say: the state perfectly devoid of public
opinion. The state where the concept of citizenship was reduced to
the concept of slavery. (14)
Mackiewicz's opinion that any form of cooperation with the communists leaves a dark mark on the human dignity of the collaborator. To quote the opening sentences of The Triumph of Provocation:
The most characteristic feature of the Communist system is the total enslavement of the human spirit, the subjugation of human thought and of the human intellect. It would appear, therefore, that the greatest enemies of this system should be found not among the workers, peasants ... and "ordinary" men and women in the street, but in the so-called progressive circles that have traditionally proclaimed to the masses the ideal of free thought and have regarded matters of the spirit as more important than daily bread. Logically, one would have expected that these intellectual circles in all countries would become the avant-garde of the battle against Communism. Nothing of this sort has happened. (TTOP 9)
When confronted with the party, the intellectuals almost always faced moral defeat. The party got what it wanted, i.e., the prestige of the intellectuals' voice. Mackiewicz points out the absurdity of the situation in the 1960s when the victims of Stalinism were called "anticommunist" and considered it an insult. They were not in the least ready to denounce their communist beliefs; they blamed Stalin and not communism for what happened. According to Mackiewicz, the communist system put on different masks depending on circumstances: it was called Bolshevism, Leninism, Stalinism, the "thaw," Gomulkism, "peaceful coexistence," or even "capitalism." Yet in Mackiewicz's view it remained an absolute evil that had to be opposed with all the might by all the people of good will. One should not attempt to reform or improve it, or try to see some positive elements in it that could prove it was capable of evolving. In Mackiewicz's view, it was wishful thinking to try to tame the USSR because such attempts ignored the core of the problem:
Communism is above all an enemy to freedom of man. However improved
the communist system would be, men cannot be free in it. This is
why any fight for "human rights" in communism without at the same
time fighting against the communist ideology is hypocrisy. (27)
The European Union has set out its commitment to the continued use of lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine passports and other restrictions this winter to control the spread of COVID-19, and also to the creation of a “legally binding” global pandemic treaty with a “reinforced WHO at its centre”.
The document, published on September 2nd and titled “EU response to COVID-19: preparing for autumn and winter 2023", was prepared by the EU Commission (the EU executive) and sent to the EU Parliament.
It reveals how much in thrall to the new biosecurity orthodoxy the EU leadership is and bodes ill for the future management of contagious disease in the bloc and globally.
On lockdowns and other restrictions, it proposes a framework of “key indicators to assess when deciding on reintroducing non-pharmaceutical measures”. These indicators include severe disease and hospital occupancy data, and importantly are stated to relate not just to COVID-19 but to influenza as well, making this potentially part of normal winter disease management, continuing indefinitely.
It suggests mask mandates as a “first option to limit community transmission”, giving a preference for FFP2 masks.
[Face mask] use in closed public spaces, including public transport, can be a first option to limit community transmission.
Recent evidence shows that FFP2 face masks, which are readily available in the EU/EEA, have a stronger protective effect than medical masks or cloth masks in the community.
Member States are therefore strongly encouraged to consider their use in specific settings.
The document recommends the pre-emptive imposition of work-from-home and gathering limits before any rise in infections to try to avoid the “need for more disruptive ones such as lock downs, closing businesses and schools, stay-at-home recommendations and travel restrictions”. It stresses the need for “political commitment” to make lockdowns and other measures work.
Other measures such as working from home or limiting the size of mass gatherings have proved effective to limit transmission of the virus.
When implemented ahead of increases in cases, these measures can avoid the need for more disruptive ones such as lockdowns, closing businesses and schools, stay-at-home recommendations and travel restrictions.
Political commitment and community engagement are key for the success and the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical measures.
The one welcome aspect of the document was the clear statement to avoid disrupting children’s education and lives any further, though even here school closures were not ruled out.
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the lives of children and adolescents affecting their everyday routines, education, health, development and overall well-being.
It is therefore important to keep in mind the negative impacts of school disruptions on the health and development of children.
The implementation of measures at schools should be aimed to be kept at a minimum and the further loss of learning should be prevented.
The document discourages travel restrictions – freedom of travel and the elimination of internal borders being an article of faith for the EU. However, it recommends use of the EU Digital Covid Certificate (i.e., vaccine passport, though it also recognizes natural immunity) wherever travel restrictions are “necessary”, boasting about how widely it is already used . . .
From Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn: We should pay attention to the frightening ideas of Geert Vanden Bossche. This long article is worthwhile, no matter how well informed you think you are.
Rather than control the pandemic, vaccines now appear instead to be contributing to it—with alarming implications, Vanden Bossche warns.
Virologist Geert Vanden Bossche predicts a vicious wave of covid-19 that will be driven by the vaccinated, or, more accurately, by the scientifically dubious policy of repeated mass vaccination.
ANTWERP, Belgium - I spent nearly three hours in this historic city on October 11 in an interview with Geert Vanden Bossche, who has devoted years to studying the complex interplay between vaccines and the human immune system. In our talk, this Belgian veterinarian-turned-virologist and vaccine researcher made unsettling predictions for the future.
I can only hope that Vanden Bossche, 62, is wrong. Let’s for the moment assume he is, that there are significant variables that can and often do intervene. That will make this story easier to read as well as write.
From the start, I asked Vanden Bossche to speak, uncharacteristically for him, in as simple terms as possible.
The short version is this: He predicts a vicious wave of covid-19, with cases already rising in parts of Europe. The coming re-emergence of SARS-CoV-2 will escalate quickly, he contends, and make all other waves pale in comparison. It will, he believes, be driven by the vaccinated, or more accurately, by the misdirected and scientifically dubious policy of repeated mass vaccination.
Vanden Bossche has long asserted that the global covid vaccination program, unprecedented in human history, would put enormous pressure on the virus to mutate; his warning has repeatedly been proven true. While the unvaccinated gained long-lasting, adaptable natural immunity from covid infection, the vaccinated harbor a confused and mostly unhelpful array of old-variant anti-spike antibodies; Vanden Bossche believes these so complicate the immune response that more serious disease from new variants will result. In the vaccinated, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, he predicts, will imminently turn a corner from more contagious to more virulent.
“The losses will be huge,” Vanden Bossche, dressed in a scarf and light jacket, told me across a table in a sunny outdoor café. Hospitals will be overwhelmed, he believes. Stability will be shaken. He has told his 20-something children (two daughters and a son), to prepare for this, even though he and his family are unvaccinated. “Literally there is no immunity, no single protection left for the vaccinated,” he said . . .http://allnewspipeline.com/Vaccine_Expert_Warns_Of_Catastrophe_Within_Months_Driven_By_The_Vaccinated.php