Can't always get what you want

Unless you're Trump. Then if you try real hard you see he does

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/monkey-wrench-sabotage-america-begs-authoritarian-response

I go to the end point with Brandon and then laugh. He bends over backwards telling us we’ll get what we need -”Do the ends justify the means? In this case, yes. When your civilization is under attack it is morally acceptable to defend it.”

Dude. Articles of Confederation. Power to the People Right On. Not this whip hand or that whip hand but no whip hand. Smash the State. Right now.

Only a pundit warns of the Iron Heel being our only choice.

I favor creative destruction. Not Civil War at all. Power out of D.C. De-Federalize-Confederate amongst each other. Love one another. OR just admit masochism holds deep meaning and you like the paddle quite a bit.

All government is worthy of RICO prosecution in a nation built as ours. Though I am dubious anything short of creative destruction of Federal and State DIKTAT has a chance. Brandon is right however that Trump will be Caudillo if pushed.

And he is right as well though he only implies it that not only top down shadow state resistance will arise. Local groups too will act. Some from the Right. Squadre d'azione (English: action squads), were outside the authority of the Italian state and led by local leaders. The militia originally consisted of farmers and middle-class people, who created their own defence from revolutionary socialists. Squadrismo became an important asset for the rise of Mussolini and systematically used violence to eliminate any political parties that were opposed to Italian Fascism.

The violence was not only an instrument in politics but also a vital component of squadrismo identity, which made it difficult for the movement to be tamed. That was shown in the various attempts by Mussolini to control squadrismo violence.

Now my view is this war gamed.

Since 2016.

An internal political war of factions is a Temporary Autonomous Zone of power above and within the law of the American political Technique. The knife fight law.

Killing History: The False Left-Right Political Spectrum and the Battle between the 'Free Left' and the 'Statist Left'

L.K. Samuels [Samuels, L.K.]

Almost everything about the political spectrum is dead wrong. If the two polar opposites are Communism versus Fascism, what is in the middle? If the middle is halfway between Communism and Fascism, then everyone not on the extreme ends must be half-communist and half-fascist? Nobody believes that, but the old political spectrum prescribes that exact political scenario. So what happened? In an effort to rewrite history, the political dichotomy has been deliberately broken, falsified, sabotaged, and made meaningless, causing the public to lose their way through the contorted political maze. The political spectrum is not only a false dichotomy, but also has been rendered contradictory and ludicrous. Many political scientists still maintain that the spectrum stretches from authoritarianism on the one polar extreme to authoritarianism on the other, leaving the middle stranded within a disturbing range of authoritarian features. This faulty designation makes the left-right model of politics a confusing mess. There must be a way to discover which political side is truly in line with one’s own philosophical beliefs. There must be a way to find meaningful coordinates and redraw the political map. This book attempts to do that, taking the approach of a political cartographer determined to produce accurate charts for pilgrims traveling the rough political landscape.Along this way, many shocking historical facts are revealed that put the old political spectrum in danger of being exposed as unreliable. For instance, Mussolini advocated Marxism for over two decades while he associated with Lenin and Trotsky. During six of those years, he was an avowed Marxist heretic and an Italian Fascist, commingled the two into a Fascist–Marxist duopoly. In 1919, a red armband-wearing Hitler became an elected official in the communist-operated Bavarian Soviet Republic; he recanted under arrest and then identified himself as a “Social Democrat.” Most of the major Nazi and Fascist leaders were Marxists, former Marxists or hard-core socialists. And a number of major historians now assert that Fascism and revolutionary syndicalism flowed out of Marxism, writing that Fascism could be considered as either a “variety” or a “very specific revision of Marxism.” With well over 1,500 footnotes from historians and political scientists, this book refurbishes the political spectrum and restores it to its original French Revolution roots and classical liberal tradition. With a slew of historical facts in hand, anyone can now navigate the political swamplands with a faithful compass to triangulate one’s own political position and peel back layers of distorted history.