Hot summer. Tension. Collapse. Election in November. “Together we know what our job is and that is to bring back to America local rule.” State Senator Ernest Wanderjahr, from the most north eastern California, was eighty one, looked forty, His green eyes were commanding. His voice baritone. Long gray hair in a pony tail. Tanned from being outdoors. Representing the Next Party in California for 18 years. “The struggle continues and I thank those who help diminish the gap between not only saying but doing. Thank you all, the struggle continues. From Sacramento the problem is the state government ignores us. From Washington the government idealizes suburban sprawl. Locally we fight for our lives. Only local rule can end this corruption. That is why this November if the Dissolve measure is not on the ballot for California I ask you return the ballot voting against all ballot measures and say freedom.". Smiling the grey haired politician prepared to leave the podium when sixteen shots from three gunmen cut him down. All three got away. The radical organization Negritude claimed responsibility. They valued a black belt homeland from LA to New York. Took up arms opposed to Biden and poverty on Labor Day Weekend seizing the customs house on Lake Superior and the following day shooting Wanderjhar for his work in politics to prop White Power. Further justification was offered of his loyalty to anything but progressivism. His only opponent was a Native American woman lawyer hired by a timber company.
2 Comments
No posts
It is not that things actively elude our minds, but that our knowledge cannot reach them. Its activity cannot penetrate to the real nature of things, or disturb the serene calm of their essences, the "otium cum dignitate of the thing-in-itself."
We can know only appearances, not the ultimate (which is also the real) nature of things. In Kantian language, our knowledge is only of pheno-mena not of Noumena. § 12. Now, as we have already pointed out il 3~6)» t^^ absurdity of making unknowable realities, the causes of phenomena, it is here merely necess- ary to point out how this assumption, in Kant's special form, is refuted by himself, and contradicts his own clearly enunciated principles.
Kant himself lays great stress on the fact that all the categories or fundamental conceptions of our knowledge have a value and a meaning only relat- ively to the world of our experience, in his own phrase, are '' of Immanent application." Now chief among these categories are the conceptions of Sub-stance and Cause. Hence, on Kant's own showing, the unknowable Noumena can be neither substances nor causes. And yet, unless they are both, we can neither say that they are, nor that they are the causes of phenomena. They are not substances, i.e., they do not exist, they are not causes, i.e., if they did, they would explain nothing. It remains that they are nothing, and that Kant's doctrine of the unknowable Noumena Is a mistake.
That this is so, has been generally admitted by all competent critics of Kant ; but it is astonishing that this result should have led so few of them to question the soundness of the basis from which Kant was able to reach such absurd conclusions.» (Riddles of the sphinx; a study in the philosophy of evolution, Schiller, F. C. S. (Ferdinand Canning Scott), 1864-1937). PocketBook Reader
Just drifting on a very warm day downtown and staying in garden and apartment after errands. I feel electoral violence is in the air. A mood. I have long haul faith in Humanity triumphing but next few years for this to happen is people are organized and do something 5 hours a week.